These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33030734)

  • 21. [Obstetrical prognosis of patients after a previous caesarean section performed before 32 weeks of amenorrhea].
    Baeza C; Mottet N; Coppola C; Desmarets M; Ramanah R; Riethmuller D
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2016 Nov; 44(11):629-635. PubMed ID: 27765430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Vaginal birth after cesarean section: management debate.
    Chattopadhyay K; Sengupta BS; Edress YB; Lambourne A
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1988 Apr; 26(2):189-96. PubMed ID: 2898393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Maternal and neonatal outcomes after uterine rupture in labor.
    Yap OW; Kim ES; Laros RK
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Jun; 184(7):1576-81. PubMed ID: 11408884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Obstetric and perinatal outcome of women para > or = 5 including one lower segment cesarean section.
    Ali AM; Abu-Heija AT
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2002 Jun; 28(3):163-5. PubMed ID: 12214833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Timing of planned repeat cesarean delivery after two or more previous cesarean sections--risk for unplanned cesarean delivery and pregnancy outcome.
    Melamed N; Hadar E; Keidar L; Peled Y; Wiznitzer A; Yogev Y
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2014 Mar; 27(5):431-8. PubMed ID: 23795868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Outcome of multiple cesarean sections in a tertiary maternity hospital in the United Arab Emirates: A retrospective analysis.
    Narava S; Pokhriyal SC; Singh SB; Barpanda S; Bricker L
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 Apr; 247():143-148. PubMed ID: 32113061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Persistent abdominal pain over uterine scar during labor as a predictor of delivery complications.
    Cohen A; Cohen Y; Laskov I; Maslovitz S; Lessing JB; Many A
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2013 Dec; 123(3):200-2. PubMed ID: 24063747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Mechanical induction of labor and ecbolic-less vaginal birth after cesarean section: A cohort study.
    Atia H; Ellaithy M; Altraigey A; Kolkailah M; Alserehi A; Ashfaq S
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jun; 57(3):421-426. PubMed ID: 29880177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Multiple cesarean section. The impact on maternal and fetal outcome.
    Qublan HS; Tahat Y
    Saudi Med J; 2006 Feb; 27(2):210-4. PubMed ID: 16501678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Impact of methods for uterine incision closure on repeat caesarean section scar of lower uterine segment.
    Yasmin S; Sadaf J; Fatima N
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2011 Sep; 21(9):522-6. PubMed ID: 21914406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Previous cesarean section and trial of labor. Factors related to uterine dehiscence.
    Tahilramaney MP; Boucher M; Eglinton GS; Beall M; Phelan JP
    J Reprod Med; 1984 Jan; 29(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 6708014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Morbidity of failed labor in patients with prior cesarean section.
    Stone J; Lockwood CJ; Berkowitz GS; Lynch L; Alvarez M; Lapinski RH; Berkowitz RL
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Dec; 167(6):1513-7. PubMed ID: 1471656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cesarean scar defect: correlation between Cesarean section number, defect size, clinical symptoms and uterine position.
    Wang CB; Chiu WW; Lee CY; Sun YL; Lin YH; Tseng CJ
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Jul; 34(1):85-9. PubMed ID: 19565535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Lower Uterine Segment Trial: A pragmatic open multicenter randomized trial].
    Rozenberg P; Deruelle P; Sénat MV; Desbrière R; Winer N; Simon E; Ville Y; Kayem G; Boutron I;
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2018 Apr; 46(4):427-432. PubMed ID: 29625873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. True rupture/scar dehiscence in delivery following prior section.
    Meehan FP; Burke G; Kehoe JT; Magani IM
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1990 Mar; 31(3):249-55. PubMed ID: 1969366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Cesarean scar defect].
    Melo-Cerda I
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2014 Aug; 82(8):530-4. PubMed ID: 25282945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of a trial of labor with an elective second cesarean section.
    McMahon MJ; Luther ER; Bowes WA; Olshan AF
    N Engl J Med; 1996 Sep; 335(10):689-95. PubMed ID: 8703167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Twin delivery after cesarean section: is a trial of labor warranted?].
    Aboulfalah A; Abbassi H; el Karroumi M; Himmi A; el Mansouri A
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1999 Dec; 28(8):820-4. PubMed ID: 10635485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Predictive factors of the delivery method in women with cesarean section scars].
    Lehmann M; Hedelin G; Sorgue C; Göllner JL; Grall C; Chami A; Collin D
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1999 Jul; 28(4):358-68. PubMed ID: 10480067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Outcome of trial of labor in patients with a single previous low transverse cesarean section for dystocia.
    Duff P; Southmayd K; Read JA
    Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Mar; 71(3 Pt 1):380-4. PubMed ID: 3347423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.