157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33031298)
1. SUZYTM forceps facilitate nasogastric tube insertion under McGRATHTM MAC videolaryngoscopic guidance: A randomized, controlled trial.
Furutani K; Watanabe T; Matsuda K; Kamiya Y; Baba H
Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Oct; 99(41):e22545. PubMed ID: 33031298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of a curved forceps with a conventional straight forceps for nasogastric tube insertion under videolaryngoscopic guidance: A randomized, crossover manikin study.
Furutani K; Watanabe T; Kamiya Y; Baba H
Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Sep; 96(35):e7983. PubMed ID: 28858136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The GlideScope with modified Magill forceps facilitates nasogastric tube insertion in anesthetized patients: A randomized clinical study.
Kim HJ; Park SI; Cho SY; Cho MJ
J Int Med Res; 2018 Aug; 46(8):3124-3130. PubMed ID: 29756483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Postoperative sore throat and subglottic injury after McGrath® MAC videolaryngoscopic intubation with versus without a stylet in patients with a high Mallampati score: a randomized controlled trial.
Yoon HK; Lee HC; Oh H; Jun K; Park HP
BMC Anesthesiol; 2019 Jul; 19(1):137. PubMed ID: 31366325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparing insertion characteristics on nasogastric tube placement by using GlideScope™ visualization vs. MacIntosh laryngoscope assistance in anaesthetized and intubated patients.
Wan Ibadullah WH; Yahya N; Ghazali SS; Kamaruzaman E; Yong LC; Dan A; Md Zain J
Braz J Anesthesiol; 2016; 66(4):363-8. PubMed ID: 27343785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Randomized comparison of the effectiveness of nasal intubation using a GlideScope video laryngoscope with Magill forceps versus vascular forceps in patients with a normal airway.
Yeom JH; Oh MK; Shin WJ; Ahn DW; Jeon WJ; Cho SY
Can J Anaesth; 2017 Dec; 64(12):1176-1181. PubMed ID: 28952139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Nasotracheal intubation of a patient with restricted mouth opening using a McGrath MAC X-Blade and Magill forceps.
Arslan Zİ; Ozdal P; Ozdamar D; Agır H; Solak M
J Anesth; 2016 Oct; 30(5):904-6. PubMed ID: 27342461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Comparison of different methods of nasogastric tube insertion in anesthetized and intubated patients].
Kavakli AS; Kavrut Ozturk N; Karaveli A; Onuk AA; Ozyurek L; Inanoglu K
Rev Bras Anestesiol; 2017; 67(6):578-583. PubMed ID: 28546013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cardiovascular responses to the insertion of nasogastric tubes during general anaesthesia.
Fassoulaki A; Athanassiou E
Can Anaesth Soc J; 1985 Nov; 32(6):651-3. PubMed ID: 2416412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Use of McGrath MAC Videolaryngoscope to Assist Transesophageal Echocardiography Probe Insertion in Intubated Patients.
Kavrut Ozturk N; Kavakli AS
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2017 Feb; 31(1):191-196. PubMed ID: 27498268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of the Magill forceps and the Boedeker (curved) intubation forceps for removal of a foreign body in a Manikin.
Boedeker BH; Bernhagen MA; Miller DJ; Doyle DJ
J Clin Anesth; 2012 Feb; 24(1):25-7. PubMed ID: 22284314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. McGrath MAC Videolaryngoscope Versus Optiscope Video Stylet for Tracheal Intubation in Patients With Manual Inline Cervical Stabilization: A Randomized Trial.
Yoon HK; Lee HC; Park JB; Oh H; Park HP
Anesth Analg; 2020 Apr; 130(4):870-878. PubMed ID: 31567321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cuff inflation technique is better than Magill forceps technique to facilitate nasotracheal intubation guiding by GlideScope® video laryngoscope.
Lin CH; Tseng KY; Su MP; Chuang WM; Hu PY; Cheng KI
Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2022 Aug; 38(8):796-803. PubMed ID: 35652136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Tracheal intubation in patients with anticipated difficult airway using Boedeker intubation forceps and McGrath videolaryngoscope.
Strøm C; Barnung S; Kristensen MS; Bøttger M; Tvede MF; Rasmussen LS
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2015 Oct; 59(9):1154-60. PubMed ID: 25982220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of Nasal Intubations by GlideScope With and Without a Bougie Guide in Patients Who Underwent Maxillofacial Surgeries: Randomized Clinical Trial.
Pourfakhr P; Ahangari A; Etezadi F; Moharari RS; Ahmadi A; Saeedi N; Najafi A
Anesth Analg; 2018 May; 126(5):1641-1645. PubMed ID: 29401075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. McGrath Video Laryngoscopy Facilitates Routine Nasotracheal Intubation in Patients Undergoing Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: A Comparison With Macintosh Laryngoscopy.
Kwak HJ; Lee SY; Lee SY; Cho SH; Kim HS; Kim JY
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Feb; 74(2):256-61. PubMed ID: 26279490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparing Video and Direct Laryngoscopy for Nasotracheal Intubation.
King BJ; Padnos I; Mancuso K; Christensen BJ
Anesth Prog; 2020 Dec; 67(4):193-199. PubMed ID: 33393610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Gastric tube insertion under direct vision using the King Vision™ video laryngoscope: a randomized, prospective, clinical trial.
Okabe T; Goto G; Hori Y; Sakamoto A
BMC Anesthesiol; 2014; 14():82. PubMed ID: 25278810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Esophageal guidewire-assisted nasogastric tube insertion in anesthetized and intubated patients: a prospective randomized controlled study.
Kirtania J; Ghose T; Garai D; Ray S
Anesth Analg; 2012 Feb; 114(2):343-8. PubMed ID: 22104075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Nasotracheal intubation performance with the mcgrath videolaryngoscope versus macintosh laryngoscope in oral and maxillofacial surgery- An observational study.
Sengel N; Karabulut G; Kavuncuoğlu D; Selmi NH; Sivgin V; Toprak ME
Niger J Clin Pract; 2022 May; 25(5):683-689. PubMed ID: 35593613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
