170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33031480)
1. Validation of the Polar V800 heart rate monitor and comparison of artifact correction methods among adults with hypertension.
Cilhoroz B; Giles D; Zaleski A; Taylor B; Fernhall B; Pescatello L
PLoS One; 2020; 15(10):e0240220. PubMed ID: 33031480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validity of the Polar V800 heart rate monitor to measure RR intervals at rest.
Giles D; Draper N; Neil W
Eur J Appl Physiol; 2016 Mar; 116(3):563-71. PubMed ID: 26708360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validity of the Polar V800 monitor for measuring heart rate variability in mountain running route conditions.
Caminal P; Sola F; Gomis P; Guasch E; Perera A; Soriano N; Mont L
Eur J Appl Physiol; 2018 Mar; 118(3):669-677. PubMed ID: 29356949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Heart Rate Variability During Exercise: A Comparison of Artefact Correction Methods.
Giles DA; Draper N
J Strength Cond Res; 2018 Mar; 32(3):726-735. PubMed ID: 29466273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validity of the Polar V800 Monitor for Assessing Heart Rate Variability in Elderly Adults under Mental Stress and Dual Task Conditions.
Huang CJ; Chan HL; Chang YJ; Chen SM; Hsu MJ
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Jan; 18(3):. PubMed ID: 33498381
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Polar® RS800CX heart rate monitor and electrocardiogram for measuring inter-beat intervals in healthy dogs.
Essner A; Sjöström R; Ahlgren E; Gustås P; Edge-Hughes L; Zetterberg L; Hellström K
Physiol Behav; 2015 Jan; 138():247-53. PubMed ID: 25446208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validity of the polar S810 heart rate monitor to measure R-R intervals at rest.
Gamelin FX; Berthoin S; Bosquet L
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2006 May; 38(5):887-93. PubMed ID: 16672842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validity of the polar S810 to measure R-R intervals in children.
Gamelin FX; Baquet G; Berthoin S; Bosquet L
Int J Sports Med; 2008 Feb; 29(2):134-8. PubMed ID: 17614016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validity of Elite-HRV Smartphone Application for Measuring Heart Rate Variability Compared to Polar V800 Heart Rate Monitor.
Chhetri P; Shrestha L; Mahotra NB
J Nepal Health Res Counc; 2022 Mar; 19(4):809-813. PubMed ID: 35615842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validation of a cardiac monitor for measuring heart rate variability in adult female pigs: accuracy, artefacts and editing.
Marchant-Forde RM; Marlin DJ; Marchant JN
Physiol Behav; 2004 Jan; 80(4):449-58. PubMed ID: 14741229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of Polar® RS800G3™ heart rate monitor with Polar® S810i™ and electrocardiogram to obtain the series of RR intervals and analysis of heart rate variability at rest.
Barbosa MP; da Silva NT; de Azevedo FM; Pastre CM; Vanderlei LC
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2016 Mar; 36(2):112-7. PubMed ID: 25348547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of three mobile devices for measuring R-R intervals and heart rate variability: Polar S810i, Suunto t6 and an ambulatory ECG system.
Weippert M; Kumar M; Kreuzfeld S; Arndt D; Rieger A; Stoll R
Eur J Appl Physiol; 2010 Jul; 109(4):779-86. PubMed ID: 20225081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validity and reliability of Polar® RS800CX heart rate monitor, measuring heart rate in dogs during standing position and at trot on a treadmill.
Essner A; Sjöström R; Ahlgren E; Lindmark B
Physiol Behav; 2013 Apr; 114-115():1-5. PubMed ID: 23499770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of Artefact Correction and Recording Device Type on the Practical Application of a Non-Linear Heart Rate Variability Biomarker for Aerobic Threshold Determination.
Rogers B; Giles D; Draper N; Mourot L; Gronwald T
Sensors (Basel); 2021 Jan; 21(3):. PubMed ID: 33530473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validity of the Polar H10 Sensor for Heart Rate Variability Analysis during Resting State and Incremental Exercise in Recreational Men and Women.
Schaffarczyk M; Rogers B; Reer R; Gronwald T
Sensors (Basel); 2022 Aug; 22(17):. PubMed ID: 36081005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Estimation of Respiratory Frequency in Women and Men by Kubios HRV Software Using the Polar H10 or Movesense Medical ECG Sensor during an Exercise Ramp.
Rogers B; Schaffarczyk M; Gronwald T
Sensors (Basel); 2022 Sep; 22(19):. PubMed ID: 36236256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative Analysis of the Equivital EQ02 Lifemonitor with Holter Ambulatory ECG Device for Continuous Measurement of ECG, Heart Rate, and Heart Rate Variability: A Validation Study for Precision and Accuracy.
Akintola AA; van de Pol V; Bimmel D; Maan AC; van Heemst D
Front Physiol; 2016; 7():391. PubMed ID: 27708585
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of the Minicardio system for heart rate variability analysis compared to ECG.
Cassirame J; Stuckey MI; Sheppard F; Tordi N
J Sports Med Phys Fitness; 2013 Jun; 53(3):248-54. PubMed ID: 23715248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validity of a Smartphone Application in Calculating Measures of Heart Rate Variability.
Himariotis AT; Coffey KF; Noel SE; Cornell DJ
Sensors (Basel); 2022 Dec; 22(24):. PubMed ID: 36560256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validity of a Smartphone Application and Chest Strap for Recording RR Intervals at Rest in Athletes.
Pereira RA; Alves JLB; Silva JHDC; Costa MDS; Silva AS
Int J Sports Physiol Perform; 2020 Jul; 15(6):896-899. PubMed ID: 32163924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
