These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33031632)

  • 1. Commentary to Gusenbauer and Haddaway 2020: Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar and PubMed.
    Klopfenstein DV; Dampier W
    Res Synth Methods; 2021 Mar; 12(2):126-135. PubMed ID: 33031632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Google Scholar is not enough to be used alone for systematic reviews.
    Giustini D; Boulos MN
    Online J Public Health Inform; 2013; 5(2):214. PubMed ID: 23923099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta-analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources.
    Gusenbauer M; Haddaway NR
    Res Synth Methods; 2020 Mar; 11(2):181-217. PubMed ID: 31614060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Types of Errors Hiding in Google Scholar Data.
    Sauvayre R
    J Med Internet Res; 2022 May; 24(5):e28354. PubMed ID: 35622395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Role of Google Scholar in Evidence Reviews and Its Applicability to Grey Literature Searching.
    Haddaway NR; Collins AM; Coughlin D; Kirk S
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0138237. PubMed ID: 26379270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The comparative recall of Google Scholar versus PubMed in identical searches for biomedical systematic reviews: a review of searches used in systematic reviews.
    Bramer WM; Giustini D; Kramer BM; Anderson P
    Syst Rev; 2013 Dec; 2():115. PubMed ID: 24360284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Google Scholar as replacement for systematic literature searches: good relative recall and precision are not enough.
    Boeker M; Vach W; Motschall E
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2013 Oct; 13():131. PubMed ID: 24160679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of PubMed and Google Scholar literature searches.
    Anders ME; Evans DP
    Respir Care; 2010 May; 55(5):578-83. PubMed ID: 20420728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Citation Cloud of a biomedical article: a free, public, web-based tool enabling citation analysis.
    Smalheiser NR; Schneider J; Torvik VI; Fragnito DP; Tirk EE
    J Med Libr Assoc; 2022 Jan; 110(1):103-108. PubMed ID: 35210969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Searching and Evaluating Publications and Preprints Using Europe PMC.
    Rosonovski S; Levchenko M; Ide-Smith M; Faulk L; Harrison M; McEntyre J
    Curr Protoc; 2023 Mar; 3(3):e694. PubMed ID: 36946755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Medical literature search dot com.
    Jain V; Raut DK
    Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol; 2011; 77(2):135-40. PubMed ID: 21393941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. SciRide Finder: a citation-based paradigm in biomedical literature search.
    Volanakis A; Krawczyk K
    Sci Rep; 2018 Apr; 8(1):6193. PubMed ID: 29670147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Literature search on risk factors for sarcoma: PubMed and Google Scholar may be complementary sources.
    Mastrangelo G; Fadda E; Rossi CR; Zamprogno E; Buja A; Cegolon L
    BMC Res Notes; 2010 May; 3():131. PubMed ID: 20459746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Difficulties and challenges associated with literature searches in operating room management, complete with recommendations.
    Wachtel RE; Dexter F
    Anesth Analg; 2013 Dec; 117(6):1460-79. PubMed ID: 24257396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Google Versus PubMed: Comparison of Google and PubMed's Search Tools for Answering Clinical Questions in the Emergency Department.
    Morshed T; Hayden S
    Ann Emerg Med; 2020 Mar; 75(3):408-415. PubMed ID: 31623934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Retrieving clinical evidence: a comparison of PubMed and Google Scholar for quick clinical searches.
    Shariff SZ; Bejaimal SA; Sontrop JM; Iansavichus AV; Haynes RB; Weir MA; Garg AX
    J Med Internet Res; 2013 Aug; 15(8):e164. PubMed ID: 23948488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Identifying evidence for public health guidance: a comparison of citation searching with Web of Science and Google Scholar.
    Levay P; Ainsworth N; Kettle R; Morgan A
    Res Synth Methods; 2016 Mar; 7(1):34-45. PubMed ID: 26147600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Scientific publishing. Google Scholar wins raves--but can it be trusted?
    Bohannon J
    Science; 2014 Jan; 343(6166):14. PubMed ID: 24385613
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. What every researcher should know about searching - clarified concepts, search advice, and an agenda to improve finding in academia.
    Gusenbauer M; Haddaway NR
    Res Synth Methods; 2021 Mar; 12(2):136-147. PubMed ID: 33031639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses.
    Falagas ME; Pitsouni EI; Malietzis GA; Pappas G
    FASEB J; 2008 Feb; 22(2):338-42. PubMed ID: 17884971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.