These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33031983)

  • 1. Step-like rising and falling of a breakthrough curve observed at a karst spring.
    Liu H; Li G
    J Contam Hydrol; 2020 Nov; 235():103726. PubMed ID: 33031983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Spatially varying dispersion to model breakthrough curves.
    Li G
    Ground Water; 2011; 49(4):584-92. PubMed ID: 21143474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Solute Migration from the Aquifer Matrix into a Solution Conduit and the Reverse.
    Li G; Field MS
    Ground Water; 2016 Sep; 54(5):699-708. PubMed ID: 26991943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Experimental and modeling evidence of kilometer-scale anomalous tracer transport in an alpine karst aquifer.
    Goeppert N; Goldscheider N; Berkowitz B
    Water Res; 2020 Jul; 178():115755. PubMed ID: 32348930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Responses of Spring Discharge to Different Rainfall Events for Single-Conduit Karst Aquifers in Western Hunan Province, China.
    Chang W; Wan J; Tan J; Wang Z; Jiang C; Huang K
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 May; 18(11):. PubMed ID: 34072196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Temperature models for quantifying groundwater seepage flux applied in a deep lake of a plateau: Yangzonghai Lake, Yunnan, China.
    Yang B; Yang S; Wan X; Hu H; Hu D; Hua M; Liu Y; Pan X
    Chemosphere; 2020 Jan; 238():124674. PubMed ID: 31524614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Analytical solution of advective mixing in a conduit.
    Li G
    Ground Water; 2009; 47(5):714-22. PubMed ID: 19735310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Can Karst Conduit Models Be Calibrated? A Dual Approach Using Dye Tracing and Temperature.
    Berglund JL; Toran L; Herman EK
    Ground Water; 2020 Nov; 58(6):924-937. PubMed ID: 32052862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Effect of Hydraulic Gradient and Pattern of Conduit Systems on Tracing Tests: Bench-Scale Modeling.
    Mohammadi Z; Gharaat MJ; Field M
    Ground Water; 2019 Jan; 57(1):110-125. PubMed ID: 29532907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Numerical simulation and protection of the dynamic change of Jinan karst spring based on coupling of seepage and conduit flow.
    Li C; Xing L; Dong Y; Peng Y; Xing X; Li C; Zhao Z
    Heliyon; 2022 Sep; 8(9):e10428. PubMed ID: 36060469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Possible conduit-matrix water exchange signatures outlined at a karst spring.
    Mitrofan H; Marin C; Povară I
    Ground Water; 2015 Apr; 53 Suppl 1():113-22. PubMed ID: 25394224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Numerical study of groundwater flow cycling controlled by seawater/freshwater interaction in a coastal karst aquifer through conduit network using CFPv2.
    Xu Z; Hu BX; Davis H; Kish S
    J Contam Hydrol; 2015 Nov; 182():131-45. PubMed ID: 26387032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Identification and Estimation of Solute Storage and Release in Karst Water Systems, South China.
    Zhang L; Luo M; Chen Z
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Oct; 17(19):. PubMed ID: 33023167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Lattice Boltzmann models for flow and transport in saturated karst.
    Anwar S; Sukop MC
    Ground Water; 2009; 47(3):401-13. PubMed ID: 19016892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Modeling solute reactivity in a phreatic solution conduit penetrating a karst aquifer.
    Field MS; Schiesser WE
    J Contam Hydrol; 2018 Oct; 217():52-70. PubMed ID: 30274863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Field study of TCE diffusion profiles below DNAPL to assess aquitard integrity.
    Parker BL; Cherry JA; Chapman SW
    J Contam Hydrol; 2004 Oct; 74(1-4):197-230. PubMed ID: 15358493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Modeling the groundwater recharge in karst aquifers by using a reservoir model.
    Ke T; Shu L; Chen X
    Water Sci Technol; 2013; 68(2):406-12. PubMed ID: 23863435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Laboratory analog and numerical study of groundwater flow and solute transport in a karst aquifer with conduit and matrix domains.
    Faulkner J; Hu BX; Kish S; Hua F
    J Contam Hydrol; 2009 Nov; 110(1-2):34-44. PubMed ID: 19767123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Process-based interpretation of tracer tests in carbonate aquifers.
    Birk S; Geyer T; Liedl R; Sauter M
    Ground Water; 2005; 43(3):381-8. PubMed ID: 15882329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Determination of pollution and recovery time of karst springs, an example from a carbonate aquifer in Israel.
    Magal E; Arbel Y; Caspi S; Glazman H; Greenbaum N; Yechieli Y
    J Contam Hydrol; 2013 Feb; 145():26-36. PubMed ID: 23270817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.