383 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33032560)
1. Skin and subcutaneous fascia closure at caesarean section to reduce wound complications: the closure randomised trial.
Poprzeczny AJ; Grivell RM; Louise J; Deussen AR; Dodd JM
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 Oct; 20(1):606. PubMed ID: 33032560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Techniques and materials for skin closure in caesarean section.
Mackeen AD; Berghella V; Larsen ML
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Nov; 11(11):CD003577. PubMed ID: 23152219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Absorbable subcuticular staples versus suture for caesarean section closure: a randomised clinical trial.
Madsen AM; Dow ML; Lohse CM; Tessmer-Tuck JA
BJOG; 2019 Mar; 126(4):502-510. PubMed ID: 30461155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Techniques and materials for skin closure in caesarean section.
Mackeen AD; Berghella V; Larsen ML
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Sep; (9):CD003577. PubMed ID: 22972064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Closure methods for laparotomy incisions for preventing incisional hernias and other wound complications.
Patel SV; Paskar DD; Nelson RL; Vedula SS; Steele SR
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Nov; 11(11):CD005661. PubMed ID: 29099149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of evidence-based interventions on wound complications after cesarean delivery.
Temming LA; Raghuraman N; Carter EB; Stout MJ; Rampersad RM; Macones GA; Cahill AG; Tuuli MG
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Oct; 217(4):449.e1-449.e9. PubMed ID: 28601567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Incidence of wound complications in cesarean deliveries following closure with absorbable subcuticular staples versus conventional skin closure techniques.
Schrufer-Poland TL; Ruiz MP; Kassar S; Tomassian C; Algren SD; Yeast JD
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Nov; 206():53-56. PubMed ID: 27632411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Continuous versus interrupted skin sutures for non-obstetric surgery.
Gurusamy KS; Toon CD; Allen VB; Davidson BR
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Feb; 2014(2):CD010365. PubMed ID: 24526375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Suture versus staples for skin closure after cesarean: a metaanalysis.
Mackeen AD; Schuster M; Berghella V
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 May; 212(5):621.e1-10. PubMed ID: 25530592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of suture materials for subcuticular skin closure at cesarean delivery.
Tuuli MG; Stout MJ; Martin S; Rampersad RM; Cahill AG; Macones GA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Oct; 215(4):490.e1-5. PubMed ID: 27179440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A randomized controlled trial of early versus delayed skin staple removal following caesarean section in the obese patient.
Nuthalapaty FS; Lee CM; Lee JH; Kuper SG; Higdon HL
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2013 May; 35(5):426-433. PubMed ID: 23756273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sutures versus clips for skin closure following caesarean section: a systematic review, meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomised controlled trials.
Zaman S; Mohamedahmed AYY; Peterknecht E; Zakaria RM; Mohamedahmed SYY; Hajibandeh S; Hajibandeh S
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2022 Feb; 407(1):37-50. PubMed ID: 34232372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Subcuticular skin closure at cesarean delivery with poliglecaprone-25 vs polyglactin-910: a randomized controlled trial.
Sharma C; Sharma S; Soni A
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2024 Feb; 6(2):101256. PubMed ID: 38109995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Subcuticular Suture Type at Cesarean Delivery and Infection Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Sobodu O; Nash CM; Stairs J
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2024 Jan; 46(1):102191. PubMed ID: 37595945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Superficial incisional surgical site infection rate after cesarean section in obese women: a randomized controlled trial of subcuticular versus interrupted skin suturing.
Ibrahim MI; Moustafa GF; Al-Hamid AS; Hussein MR
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 May; 289(5):981-6. PubMed ID: 24272023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Suture Compared With Staples for Skin Closure After Cesarean Delivery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Mackeen AD; Sullivan MV; Schuster M; Berghella V
Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Aug; 140(2):293-303. PubMed ID: 35852281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Subcutaneous stitch closure versus subcutaneous drain to prevent wound disruption after cesarean delivery: a randomized clinical trial.
Magann EF; Chauhan SP; Rodts-Palenik S; Bufkin L; Martin JN; Morrison JC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Jun; 186(6):1119-23. PubMed ID: 12066083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cesarean wound closure in body mass index 40 or greater comparing suture to staples: a randomized clinical trial.
Rodel RL; Gray KM; Quiner TE; Bodea Braescu A; Gerkin R; Perlow JH
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2021 Jan; 3(1):100271. PubMed ID: 33451603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Wound complications in obese women after cesarean: a comparison of staples versus subcuticular suture.
Zaki MN; Truong M; Pyra M; Kominiarek MA; Irwin T
J Perinatol; 2016 Oct; 36(10):819-22. PubMed ID: 27253895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Suture compared with staple skin closure after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial.
Mackeen AD; Khalifeh A; Fleisher J; Vogell A; Han C; Sendecki J; Pettker C; Leiby BE; Baxter JK; Sfakianaki A; Berghella V
Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jun; 123(6):1169-1175. PubMed ID: 24807325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
