BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33033187)

  • 1. Comment on "Female toads engaging in adaptive hybridization prefer high-quality heterospecifics as mates".
    Braun MJ; Wilkinson GS; Cade BS
    Science; 2020 Oct; 370(6513):. PubMed ID: 33033187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Response to Comment on "Females engaging in adaptive hybridization prefer high-quality heterospecifics as mates".
    Chen C; Pfennig KS
    Science; 2020 Oct; 370(6513):. PubMed ID: 33033188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Female toads engaging in adaptive hybridization prefer high-quality heterospecifics as mates.
    Chen C; Pfennig KS
    Science; 2020 Mar; 367(6484):1377-1379. PubMed ID: 32193328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Facultative mate choice drives adaptive hybridization.
    Pfennig KS
    Science; 2007 Nov; 318(5852):965-7. PubMed ID: 17991861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mating with the wrong species can be right.
    Reyer HU
    Trends Ecol Evol; 2008 Jun; 23(6):289-92. PubMed ID: 18440091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hybridization and adaptive mate choice in flycatchers.
    Veen T; Borge T; Griffith SC; Saetre GP; Bures S; Gustafsson L; Sheldon BC
    Nature; 2001 May; 411(6833):45-50. PubMed ID: 11333971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hybrid female mate choice as a species isolating mechanism: environment matters.
    Schmidt EM; Pfennig KS
    J Evol Biol; 2016 Apr; 29(4):865-9. PubMed ID: 26717048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Diet alters species recognition in juvenile toads.
    Pfennig KS; Rodriguez Moncalvo VG; Burmeister SS
    Biol Lett; 2013 Oct; 9(5):20130599. PubMed ID: 24088562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Adaptive female choice for middle-aged mates in a lekking sandfly.
    Jones TM; Balmford A; Quinnell RJ
    Proc Biol Sci; 2000 Apr; 267(1444):681-6. PubMed ID: 10821613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evolution of the genetic covariance between male and female components of mate recognition: an experimental test.
    Blows MW
    Proc Biol Sci; 1999 Nov; 266(1434):2169-74. PubMed ID: 10681248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Character displacement and the evolution of mate choice: an artificial neural network approach.
    Pfennig KS; Ryan MJ
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2007 Mar; 362(1479):411-9. PubMed ID: 17255015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Differential selection to avoid hybridization in two toad species.
    Pfennig KS; Simovich MA
    Evolution; 2002 Sep; 56(9):1840-8. PubMed ID: 12389729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Genetic quality and sexual selection: an integrated framework for good genes and compatible genes.
    Neff BD; Pitcher TE
    Mol Ecol; 2005 Jan; 14(1):19-38. PubMed ID: 15643948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Female competition and its evolutionary consequences in mammals.
    Stockley P; Bro-Jørgensen J
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2011 May; 86(2):341-66. PubMed ID: 20636474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evolution of mate-finding Allee effect in prey.
    Berec L; Bernhauerová V; Boldin B
    J Theor Biol; 2018 Mar; 441():9-18. PubMed ID: 29277599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Adult sex ratio influences mate choice in Darwin's finches.
    Grant PR; Grant BR
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2019 Jun; 116(25):12373-12382. PubMed ID: 31160459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Choice of high-quality mates versus avoidance of low-quality mates.
    Gomes ACR; Cardoso GC
    Evolution; 2018 Dec; 72(12):2608-2616. PubMed ID: 30421418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Peering through the looking glass at a sexual parasite: are Amazon mollies red queens?
    Dries LA
    Evolution; 2003 Jun; 57(6):1387-96. PubMed ID: 12894946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sex differences in mate recognition and conspecific preference in species with mutual mate choice.
    Kozak GM; Reisland M; Boughmann JW
    Evolution; 2009 Feb; 63(2):353-65. PubMed ID: 19154359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Good vs complementary genes for parasite resistance and the evolution of mate choice.
    Howard RS; Lively CM
    BMC Evol Biol; 2004 Nov; 4():48. PubMed ID: 15555062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.