These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33033187)

  • 21. The evolution of male mate choice in insects: a synthesis of ideas and evidence.
    Bonduriansky R
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2001 Aug; 76(3):305-39. PubMed ID: 11569787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Mate choice and uncertainty in the decision process.
    Wiegmann DD; Angeloni LM
    J Theor Biol; 2007 Dec; 249(4):654-66. PubMed ID: 17942125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Informative predation: Towards a new species concept].
    Lherminier P
    C R Biol; 2018 Apr; 341(4):209-218. PubMed ID: 29606595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Reproductive isolation driven by the combined effects of ecological adaptation and reinforcement.
    Nosil P; Crespi BJ; Sandoval CP
    Proc Biol Sci; 2003 Sep; 270(1527):1911-8. PubMed ID: 14561304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Reproductive interference between animal species.
    Gröning J; Hochkirch A
    Q Rev Biol; 2008 Sep; 83(3):257-82. PubMed ID: 18792662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Variation in the strength of male mate choice allows long-term coexistence of sperm-dependent asexuals and their sexual hosts.
    Mee JA; Otto SP
    Evolution; 2010 Oct; 64(10):2808-19. PubMed ID: 20550576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Leptin Manipulation Reduces Appetite and Causes a Switch in Mating Preference in the Plains Spadefoot Toad (Spea bombifrons).
    Garcia NW; Pfennig KS; Burmeister SS
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(4):e0125981. PubMed ID: 25919309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Beyond hybridization: diversity of interactions with heterospecifics, direct fitness consequences and the effects on mate preferences.
    Svensson EI
    J Evol Biol; 2013 Feb; 26(2):270-3. PubMed ID: 23324004
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evolutionary significance of promiscuity in an aphidophagous ladybird, Propylea dissecta (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae).
    Omkar ; Mishra G
    Bull Entomol Res; 2005 Dec; 95(6):527-33. PubMed ID: 16370110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Sex with no regrets: How sexual reproduction uses a no regret learning algorithm for evolutionary advantage.
    Edhan O; Hellman Z; Sherill-Rofe D
    J Theor Biol; 2017 Aug; 426():67-81. PubMed ID: 28522360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. HOW MATE AVAILABILITY INFLUENCES FILIAL CANNIBALISM.
    Deal ND; Wong BB
    Q Rev Biol; 2016 Mar; 91(1):47-67. PubMed ID: 27192779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Adaptive genetic complementarity in mate choice coexists with selection for elaborate sexual traits.
    Oh KP; Badyaev AV
    Proc Biol Sci; 2006 Aug; 273(1596):1913-9. PubMed ID: 16822752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The role of prezygotic isolation mechanisms in the divergence of two parasite species.
    Henrich T; Kalbe M
    BMC Evol Biol; 2016 Nov; 16(1):245. PubMed ID: 27829374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Cryptic sex-ratio bias provides indirect genetic benefits despite sexual conflict.
    Cox RM; Calsbeek R
    Science; 2010 Apr; 328(5974):92-4. PubMed ID: 20203012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Clutch size evolution under sexual conflict enhances the stability of mating systems.
    Smith HG; Härdling R
    Proc Biol Sci; 2000 Nov; 267(1458):2163-70. PubMed ID: 11413628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effects on population divergence of within-generational learning about prospective mates.
    Servedio MR; Dukas R
    Evolution; 2013 Aug; 67(8):2363-75. PubMed ID: 23888857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Veiled preferences and cryptic female choice could underlie the origin of novel sexual traits.
    Moehring AJ; Boughman JW
    Biol Lett; 2019 Feb; 15(2):20180878. PubMed ID: 30958124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Piecing together female extra-pair mate choice: females really do prefer more ornamented males.
    Wells SJ; Safran RJ; Dale J
    Mol Ecol; 2016 Aug; 25(15):3521-4. PubMed ID: 27463236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evolutionary and ecological implications of sexual parasitism.
    Lehtonen J; Schmidt DJ; Heubel K; Kokko H
    Trends Ecol Evol; 2013 May; 28(5):297-306. PubMed ID: 23399316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Reproductive foragers: male spiders choose mates by selecting among competitive environments.
    Jordan LA; Kokko H; Kasumovic M
    Am Nat; 2014 May; 183(5):638-49. PubMed ID: 24739196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.