These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Influence of female cuticular hydrocarbon (CHC) profile on male courtship behavior in two hybridizing field crickets Gryllus firmus and Gryllus pennsylvanicus. Heggeseth B; Sim D; Partida L; Maroja LS BMC Evol Biol; 2020 Feb; 20(1):21. PubMed ID: 32019492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Adaptive female choice for middle-aged mates in a lekking sandfly. Jones TM; Balmford A; Quinnell RJ Proc Biol Sci; 2000 Apr; 267(1444):681-6. PubMed ID: 10821613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mating with the wrong species can be right. Reyer HU Trends Ecol Evol; 2008 Jun; 23(6):289-92. PubMed ID: 18440091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sex differences in mate recognition and conspecific preference in species with mutual mate choice. Kozak GM; Reisland M; Boughmann JW Evolution; 2009 Feb; 63(2):353-65. PubMed ID: 19154359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Why do males choose heterospecific females in the red spider mite? Sato Y; Staudacher H; Sabelis MW Exp Appl Acarol; 2016 Jan; 68(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 26530994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of experimental design on Drosophila sexual isolation studies: direct effects and comparison to field hybridization data. Coyne JA; Elwyn S; Rolán-Alvarez E Evolution; 2005 Dec; 59(12):2588-601. PubMed ID: 16526506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Differential selection to avoid hybridization in two toad species. Pfennig KS; Simovich MA Evolution; 2002 Sep; 56(9):1840-8. PubMed ID: 12389729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reproductive foragers: male spiders choose mates by selecting among competitive environments. Jordan LA; Kokko H; Kasumovic M Am Nat; 2014 May; 183(5):638-49. PubMed ID: 24739196 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Should females prefer to mate with low-quality males? Cotar C; McNamara JM; Collins EJ; Houston AI J Theor Biol; 2008 Oct; 254(3):561-7. PubMed ID: 18625245 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Females avoid manipulative males and live longer. Moore AJ; Gowaty PA; Moore PJ J Evol Biol; 2003 May; 16(3):523-30. PubMed ID: 14635853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Character displacement and the evolution of mate choice: an artificial neural network approach. Pfennig KS; Ryan MJ Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2007 Mar; 362(1479):411-9. PubMed ID: 17255015 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The evolution of conspecific gamete precedence and its effect on reinforcement. Lorch PD; Servedio MR J Evol Biol; 2007 May; 20(3):937-49. PubMed ID: 17465905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Female mate preference and sexual conflict: females prefer males that have had fewer consorts. Harris WE; Moore PJ Am Nat; 2005 May; 165 Suppl 5():S64-71. PubMed ID: 15795863 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Female competition and its evolutionary consequences in mammals. Stockley P; Bro-Jørgensen J Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2011 May; 86(2):341-66. PubMed ID: 20636474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Multiple post-mating barriers to hybridization in field crickets. Tyler F; Harrison XA; Bretman A; Veen T; Rodríguez-Muñoz R; Tregenza T Mol Ecol; 2013 Mar; 22(6):1640-9. PubMed ID: 23294288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]