These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
299 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33033279)
1. Two ways to overcome the three social dilemmas of indirect reciprocity. Okada I Sci Rep; 2020 Oct; 10(1):16799. PubMed ID: 33033279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Indirect reciprocity in three types of social dilemmas. Nakamura M; Ohtsuki H J Theor Biol; 2014 Aug; 355():117-27. PubMed ID: 24721479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A second-order stability analysis for the continuous model of indirect reciprocity. Lee S; Murase Y; Baek SK J Theor Biol; 2022 Sep; 548():111202. PubMed ID: 35752284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Indirect reciprocity under incomplete observation. Nakamura M; Masuda N PLoS Comput Biol; 2011 Jul; 7(7):e1002113. PubMed ID: 21829335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. When is altruistic punishment useful in social dilemmas? Greenwood GW; Abbass HA; Petraki E Biosystems; 2018 Dec; 174():60-62. PubMed ID: 30391264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The leading eight: social norms that can maintain cooperation by indirect reciprocity. Ohtsuki H; Iwasa Y J Theor Biol; 2006 Apr; 239(4):435-44. PubMed ID: 16174521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reciprocity: weak or strong? What punishment experiments do (and do not) demonstrate. Guala F Behav Brain Sci; 2012 Feb; 35(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 22289303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Direct reciprocity with costly punishment: generous tit-for-tat prevails. Rand DG; Ohtsuki H; Nowak MA J Theor Biol; 2009 Jan; 256(1):45-57. PubMed ID: 18938180 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Indirect reciprocity provides only a narrow margin of efficiency for costly punishment. Ohtsuki H; Iwasa Y; Nowak MA Nature; 2009 Jan; 457(7225):79-82. PubMed ID: 19122640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Transient nature of cooperation by pay-it-forward reciprocity. Horita Y; Takezawa M; Kinjo T; Nakawake Y; Masuda N Sci Rep; 2016 Jan; 6():19471. PubMed ID: 26786178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The emergence and selection of reputation systems that drive cooperative behaviour. Schlaepfer A Proc Biol Sci; 2018 Sep; 285(1886):. PubMed ID: 30185638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Indirect reciprocity can overcome free-rider problems on costly moral assessment. Sasaki T; Okada I; Nakai Y Biol Lett; 2016 Jul; 12(7):. PubMed ID: 27381886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Groupwise information sharing promotes ingroup favoritism in indirect reciprocity. Nakamura M; Masuda N BMC Evol Biol; 2012 Nov; 12():213. PubMed ID: 23126611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The social structure of cooperation and punishment. Gintis H; Fehr E Behav Brain Sci; 2012 Feb; 35(1):28-9. PubMed ID: 22289317 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Emergence of specialized third-party enforcement. Mohlin E; Rigos A; Weidenholzer S Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2023 Jun; 120(24):e2207029120. PubMed ID: 37279275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Three-person game facilitates indirect reciprocity under image scoring. Suzuki S; Akiyama E J Theor Biol; 2007 Nov; 249(1):93-100. PubMed ID: 17714735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Experiments combining communication with punishment options demonstrate how individuals can overcome social dilemmas. Ostrom E Behav Brain Sci; 2012 Feb; 35(1):33-4. PubMed ID: 22289323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Stable polymorphism of cooperators and punishers in a public goods game. Oya G; Ohtsuki H J Theor Biol; 2017 Apr; 419():243-253. PubMed ID: 27880875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [A test of the strong reciprocity model: relationship between cooperation and punishment]. Li Y; Yamagishi T Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2014 Apr; 85(1):100-5. PubMed ID: 24804436 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]