139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33035938)
1. Evaluation of a multivariate analysis modeling approach identifying sources and patterns of nonpoint fecal pollution in a mixed use watershed.
Reitz A; Hemric E; Hall KK
J Environ Manage; 2021 Jan; 277():111413. PubMed ID: 33035938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Application of multivariate statistical methodology to model factors influencing fate and transport of fecal pollution in surface waters.
Hall KK; Evanshen BG; Maier KJ; Scheuerman PR
J Environ Qual; 2014 Jan; 43(1):358-70. PubMed ID: 25602570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multiple modes of water quality impairment by fecal contamination in a rapidly developing coastal area: southwest Brunswick County, North Carolina.
Cahoon LB; Hales JC; Carey ES; Loucaides S; Rowland KR; Toothman BR
Environ Monit Assess; 2016 Feb; 188(2):89. PubMed ID: 26769702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A geospatial analysis of land use and stormwater management on fecal coliform contamination in North Carolina streams.
Vitro KA; BenDor TK; Jordanova TV; Miles B
Sci Total Environ; 2017 Dec; 603-604():709-727. PubMed ID: 28359567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fecal Sterol and Runoff Analysis for Nonpoint Source Tracking.
Fahrenfeld NL; Del Monaco N; Coates JT; Elzerman AW
J Environ Qual; 2016 Jan; 45(1):315-22. PubMed ID: 26828187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Enterococcal Concentrations in a Coastal Ecosystem Are a Function of Fecal Source Input, Environmental Conditions, and Environmental Sources.
Rothenheber D; Jones S
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2018 Sep; 84(17):. PubMed ID: 30006393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Identifying fecal pollution sources using 3M(™) Petrifilm (™) count plates and antibiotic resistance analysis in the Horse Creek Watershed in Aiken County, SC (USA).
Harmon SM; West RT; Yates JR
Environ Monit Assess; 2014 Dec; 186(12):8215-27. PubMed ID: 25139239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of Microbial and Chemical Source Tracking Markers To Identify Fecal Contamination Sources in the Humber River (Toronto, Ontario, Canada) and Associated Storm Water Outfalls.
Staley ZR; Grabuski J; Sverko E; Edge TA
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2016 Nov; 82(21):6357-6366. PubMed ID: 27542934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Scaling and management of fecal indicator bacteria in runoff from a coastal urban watershed in southern California.
Reeves RL; Grant SB; Mrse RD; Copil Oancea CM; Sanders BF; Boehm AB
Environ Sci Technol; 2004 May; 38(9):2637-48. PubMed ID: 15180060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A systematic assessment of watershed-scale nonpoint source pollution during rainfall-runoff events in the Miyun Reservoir watershed.
Qiu J; Shen Z; Wei G; Wang G; Xie H; Lv G
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Mar; 25(7):6514-6531. PubMed ID: 29255977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Determining sources of fecal pollution in a rural Virginia watershed with antibiotic resistance patterns in fecal streptococci.
Hagedorn C; Robinson SL; Filtz JR; Grubbs SM; Angier TA; Reneau RB
Appl Environ Microbiol; 1999 Dec; 65(12):5522-31. PubMed ID: 10584013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Microbial Source Tracking Using Quantitative and Digital PCR To Identify Sources of Fecal Contamination in Stormwater, River Water, and Beach Water in a Great Lakes Area of Concern.
Staley ZR; Boyd RJ; Shum P; Edge TA
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2018 Oct; 84(20):. PubMed ID: 30097445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fecal bacteria in the rivers of the Seine drainage network (France): sources, fate and modelling.
Servais P; Garcia-Armisen T; George I; Billen G
Sci Total Environ; 2007 Apr; 375(1-3):152-67. PubMed ID: 17239424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Economic total maximum daily load for watershed-based pollutant trading.
Zaidi AZ; deMonsabert SM
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2015 Apr; 22(8):6308-24. PubMed ID: 25487554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Development of bacteria and benthic total maximum daily loads: a case study, Linville Creek, Virginia.
Benham BL; Brannan KM; Yagow G; Zeckoski RW; Dillaha TA; Mostaghimi S; Wynn JW
J Environ Qual; 2005; 34(5):1860-72. PubMed ID: 16151238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Application of integrated GIS and multimedia modeling on NPS pollution evaluation.
Lin CE; Kao CM; Lai YC; Shan WL; Wu CY
Environ Monit Assess; 2009 Nov; 158(1-4):319-31. PubMed ID: 18956245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Elucidating Waterborne Pathogen Presence and Aiding Source Apportionment in an Impaired Stream.
Weidhaas J; Anderson A; Jamal R
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2018 Mar; 84(6):. PubMed ID: 29305503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Inverse estimation of nonpoint sources of fecal coliform for establishing allowable load for Wye River, Maryland.
Shen J; Jia JJ; Sisson GM
Water Res; 2006 Oct; 40(18):3333-42. PubMed ID: 16978682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fecal pollution source tracking toolbox for identification, evaluation and characterization of fecal contamination in receiving urban surface waters and groundwater.
Tran NH; Gin KY; Ngo HH
Sci Total Environ; 2015 Dec; 538():38-57. PubMed ID: 26298247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Modeling agricultural nonpoint source pollution using a geographic information system approach.
Emili LA; Greene RP
Environ Manage; 2013 Jan; 51(1):70-95. PubMed ID: 22983655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
