392 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33036222)
1. Contrast-Enhanced Harmonic Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration versus Standard Fine-Needle Aspiration in Pancreatic Masses: A Propensity Score Analysis.
Facciorusso A; Cotsoglou C; Chierici A; Mare R; Crinò SF; Muscatiello N
Diagnostics (Basel); 2020 Oct; 10(10):. PubMed ID: 33036222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration versus standard fine-needle aspiration in pancreatic masses: a meta-analysis.
Facciorusso A; Mohan BP; Crinò SF; Ofosu A; Ramai D; Lisotti A; Chandan S; Fusaroli P
Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2021 Jul; 15(7):821-828. PubMed ID: 33481633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Conventional versus contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration for diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions: A prospective randomized trial.
Sugimoto M; Takagi T; Hikichi T; Suzuki R; Watanabe K; Nakamura J; Kikuchi H; Konno N; Waragai Y; Watanabe H; Obara K; Ohira H
Pancreatology; 2015; 15(5):538-541. PubMed ID: 26145837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Contrast-enhanced harmonic versus standard endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in solid pancreatic lesions: a single-center prospective randomized trial.
Seicean A; Samarghitan A; Bolboacă SD; Pojoga C; Rusu I; Rusu D; Sparchez Z; Gheorghiu M; Al Hajjar N; Seicean R
Endoscopy; 2020 Dec; 52(12):1084-1090. PubMed ID: 32650346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Relationship of pancreatic mass size and diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration.
Siddiqui AA; Brown LJ; Hong SK; Draganova-Tacheva RA; Korenblit J; Loren DE; Kowalski TE; Solomides C
Dig Dis Sci; 2011 Nov; 56(11):3370-5. PubMed ID: 21688127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Touch imprint cytology on endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle biopsy provides comparable sample quality and diagnostic yield to standard endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration specimens in the evaluation of solid pancreatic lesions.
Crinò SF; Larghi A; Bernardoni L; Parisi A; Frulloni L; Gabbrielli A; Parcesepe P; Scarpa A; Manfrin E
Cytopathology; 2019 Mar; 30(2):179-186. PubMed ID: 30484917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Harmonic Contrast-Enhanced Endoscopic Ultrasonography for the Guidance of Fine-Needle Aspiration in Solid Pancreatic Masses.
Seicean A; Badea R; Moldovan-Pop A; Vultur S; Botan EC; Zaharie T; Săftoiu A; Mocan T; Iancu C; Graur F; Sparchez Z; Seicean R
Ultraschall Med; 2017 Apr; 38(2):174-182. PubMed ID: 26274382
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Direct Comparison of Elastography Endoscopic Ultrasound Fine-Needle Aspiration and B-Mode Endoscopic Ultrasound Fine-Needle Aspiration in Diagnosing Solid Pancreatic Lesions.
Gheorghiu M; Sparchez Z; Rusu I; Bolboacă SD; Seicean R; Pojoga C; Seicean A
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Jan; 19(3):. PubMed ID: 35162325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. High-resolution endoscopic ultrasound imaging and the number of needle passages are significant factors predicting high yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for pancreatic solid masses without an on-site cytopathologist.
Jeong SH; Yoon HH; Kim EJ; Kim YJ; Kim YS; Cho JH
Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Jan; 96(2):e5782. PubMed ID: 28079803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration versus Percutaneous Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration in Diagnosis of Focal Pancreatic Masses.
Okasha HH; Naga MI; Esmat S; Naguib M; Hassanein M; Hassani M; El-Kassas M; Mahdy RE; El-Gemeie E; Farag AH; Foda AM
Endosc Ultrasound; 2013 Oct; 2(4):190-3. PubMed ID: 24949394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Analysis of Fine-Needle Biopsy vs Fine-Needle Aspiration in Diagnosis of Pancreatic and Abdominal Masses: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial.
Cheng B; Zhang Y; Chen Q; Sun B; Deng Z; Shan H; Dou L; Wang J; Li Y; Yang X; Jiang T; Xu G; Wang G
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2018 Aug; 16(8):1314-1321. PubMed ID: 28733257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The usefulness of EUS-FNA with contrast-enhanced harmonic imaging of solid pancreatic lesions: A prospective study.
Itonaga M; Kitano M; Kojima F; Hatamaru K; Yamashita Y; Tamura T; Nuta J; Kawaji Y; Shimokawa T; Tanioka K; Murata SI
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2020 Dec; 35(12):2273-2280. PubMed ID: 32529685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration versus fine-needle biopsy and impact of rapid on-site evaluation for pancreatic masses.
de Moura DTH; McCarty TR; Jirapinyo P; Ribeiro IB; Hathorn KE; Madruga-Neto AC; Lee LS; Thompson CC
Endosc Int Open; 2020 Jun; 8(6):E738-E747. PubMed ID: 32490158
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Contrast-Enhanced Harmonic Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Puncture for the Patients with Pancreatic Masses.
Otsuka Y; Kamata K; Kudo M
Diagnostics (Basel); 2023 Mar; 13(6):. PubMed ID: 36980346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic value of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration with rapid on-site evaluation performed by endoscopists in solid pancreatic lesions: A prospective, randomized controlled trial.
Zhang S; Ni M; Wang P; Zheng J; Sun Q; Xu G; Peng C; Shen S; Zhang W; Huang S; Wang L; Zou X; Lv Y
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2022 Oct; 37(10):1975-1982. PubMed ID: 35614028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound guided 22-gauge core needle with standard 25-gauge fine-needle aspiration for diagnosing solid pancreatic lesions.
Berzosa M; Villa N; El-Serag HB; Sejpal DV; Patel KK
Endosc Ultrasound; 2015; 4(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 25789281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Core Needle Biopsy and Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration for Solid Pancreatic Lesions.
Sur YK; Kim YC; Kim JK; Lee JH; Yoo BM; Kim YB
J Ultrasound Med; 2015 Dec; 34(12):2163-9. PubMed ID: 26491091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Endoscopic Ultrasound Fine-Needle Biopsy versus Fine-Needle Aspiration for Tissue Sampling of Abdominal Lymph Nodes: A Propensity Score Matched Multicenter Comparative Study.
Facciorusso A; Crinò SF; Muscatiello N; Gkolfakis P; Samanta J; Londoño Castillo J; Cotsoglou C; Ramai D
Cancers (Basel); 2021 Aug; 13(17):. PubMed ID: 34503112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative accuracy of needle sizes and designs for EUS tissue sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a network meta-analysis.
Facciorusso A; Wani S; Triantafyllou K; Tziatzios G; Cannizzaro R; Muscatiello N; Singh S
Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Dec; 90(6):893-903.e7. PubMed ID: 31310744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of Pancreatic Lesions With Endoscopic Ultrasound and Fine Needle Aspiration.
Luk Y; She WH; Chow FCL; Ma KW; Tsang SHY; Dai WC; Cheung TT; Lo CM
Surg Innov; 2020 Oct; 27(5):431-438. PubMed ID: 32476606
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
