These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

390 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33036222)

  • 1. Contrast-Enhanced Harmonic Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration versus Standard Fine-Needle Aspiration in Pancreatic Masses: A Propensity Score Analysis.
    Facciorusso A; Cotsoglou C; Chierici A; Mare R; Crinò SF; Muscatiello N
    Diagnostics (Basel); 2020 Oct; 10(10):. PubMed ID: 33036222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration versus standard fine-needle aspiration in pancreatic masses: a meta-analysis.
    Facciorusso A; Mohan BP; Crinò SF; Ofosu A; Ramai D; Lisotti A; Chandan S; Fusaroli P
    Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2021 Jul; 15(7):821-828. PubMed ID: 33481633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Conventional versus contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration for diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions: A prospective randomized trial.
    Sugimoto M; Takagi T; Hikichi T; Suzuki R; Watanabe K; Nakamura J; Kikuchi H; Konno N; Waragai Y; Watanabe H; Obara K; Ohira H
    Pancreatology; 2015; 15(5):538-541. PubMed ID: 26145837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Contrast-enhanced harmonic versus standard endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in solid pancreatic lesions: a single-center prospective randomized trial.
    Seicean A; Samarghitan A; Bolboacă SD; Pojoga C; Rusu I; Rusu D; Sparchez Z; Gheorghiu M; Al Hajjar N; Seicean R
    Endoscopy; 2020 Dec; 52(12):1084-1090. PubMed ID: 32650346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Relationship of pancreatic mass size and diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration.
    Siddiqui AA; Brown LJ; Hong SK; Draganova-Tacheva RA; Korenblit J; Loren DE; Kowalski TE; Solomides C
    Dig Dis Sci; 2011 Nov; 56(11):3370-5. PubMed ID: 21688127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Touch imprint cytology on endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle biopsy provides comparable sample quality and diagnostic yield to standard endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration specimens in the evaluation of solid pancreatic lesions.
    Crinò SF; Larghi A; Bernardoni L; Parisi A; Frulloni L; Gabbrielli A; Parcesepe P; Scarpa A; Manfrin E
    Cytopathology; 2019 Mar; 30(2):179-186. PubMed ID: 30484917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Harmonic Contrast-Enhanced Endoscopic Ultrasonography for the Guidance of Fine-Needle Aspiration in Solid Pancreatic Masses.
    Seicean A; Badea R; Moldovan-Pop A; Vultur S; Botan EC; Zaharie T; Săftoiu A; Mocan T; Iancu C; Graur F; Sparchez Z; Seicean R
    Ultraschall Med; 2017 Apr; 38(2):174-182. PubMed ID: 26274382
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Direct Comparison of Elastography Endoscopic Ultrasound Fine-Needle Aspiration and B-Mode Endoscopic Ultrasound Fine-Needle Aspiration in Diagnosing Solid Pancreatic Lesions.
    Gheorghiu M; Sparchez Z; Rusu I; Bolboacă SD; Seicean R; Pojoga C; Seicean A
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Jan; 19(3):. PubMed ID: 35162325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. High-resolution endoscopic ultrasound imaging and the number of needle passages are significant factors predicting high yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for pancreatic solid masses without an on-site cytopathologist.
    Jeong SH; Yoon HH; Kim EJ; Kim YJ; Kim YS; Cho JH
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Jan; 96(2):e5782. PubMed ID: 28079803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration versus Percutaneous Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration in Diagnosis of Focal Pancreatic Masses.
    Okasha HH; Naga MI; Esmat S; Naguib M; Hassanein M; Hassani M; El-Kassas M; Mahdy RE; El-Gemeie E; Farag AH; Foda AM
    Endosc Ultrasound; 2013 Oct; 2(4):190-3. PubMed ID: 24949394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Analysis of Fine-Needle Biopsy vs Fine-Needle Aspiration in Diagnosis of Pancreatic and Abdominal Masses: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Cheng B; Zhang Y; Chen Q; Sun B; Deng Z; Shan H; Dou L; Wang J; Li Y; Yang X; Jiang T; Xu G; Wang G
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2018 Aug; 16(8):1314-1321. PubMed ID: 28733257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The usefulness of EUS-FNA with contrast-enhanced harmonic imaging of solid pancreatic lesions: A prospective study.
    Itonaga M; Kitano M; Kojima F; Hatamaru K; Yamashita Y; Tamura T; Nuta J; Kawaji Y; Shimokawa T; Tanioka K; Murata SI
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2020 Dec; 35(12):2273-2280. PubMed ID: 32529685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration versus fine-needle biopsy and impact of rapid on-site evaluation for pancreatic masses.
    de Moura DTH; McCarty TR; Jirapinyo P; Ribeiro IB; Hathorn KE; Madruga-Neto AC; Lee LS; Thompson CC
    Endosc Int Open; 2020 Jun; 8(6):E738-E747. PubMed ID: 32490158
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Contrast-Enhanced Harmonic Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Puncture for the Patients with Pancreatic Masses.
    Otsuka Y; Kamata K; Kudo M
    Diagnostics (Basel); 2023 Mar; 13(6):. PubMed ID: 36980346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Diagnostic value of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration with rapid on-site evaluation performed by endoscopists in solid pancreatic lesions: A prospective, randomized controlled trial.
    Zhang S; Ni M; Wang P; Zheng J; Sun Q; Xu G; Peng C; Shen S; Zhang W; Huang S; Wang L; Zou X; Lv Y
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2022 Oct; 37(10):1975-1982. PubMed ID: 35614028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) elastography-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) versus conventional EUS FNAC for solid pancreatic lesions: A pilot randomized trial.
    Nayak HK; Rai A; Gupta S; Prakash JH; Patra S; Panigrahi C; Patel RK; Pattnaik B; Kar M; Panigrahi MK; Samal SC
    Indian J Gastroenterol; 2024 Sep; ():. PubMed ID: 39230660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound guided 22-gauge core needle with standard 25-gauge fine-needle aspiration for diagnosing solid pancreatic lesions.
    Berzosa M; Villa N; El-Serag HB; Sejpal DV; Patel KK
    Endosc Ultrasound; 2015; 4(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 25789281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Core Needle Biopsy and Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration for Solid Pancreatic Lesions.
    Sur YK; Kim YC; Kim JK; Lee JH; Yoo BM; Kim YB
    J Ultrasound Med; 2015 Dec; 34(12):2163-9. PubMed ID: 26491091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Endoscopic Ultrasound Fine-Needle Biopsy versus Fine-Needle Aspiration for Tissue Sampling of Abdominal Lymph Nodes: A Propensity Score Matched Multicenter Comparative Study.
    Facciorusso A; Crinò SF; Muscatiello N; Gkolfakis P; Samanta J; Londoño Castillo J; Cotsoglou C; Ramai D
    Cancers (Basel); 2021 Aug; 13(17):. PubMed ID: 34503112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative accuracy of needle sizes and designs for EUS tissue sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a network meta-analysis.
    Facciorusso A; Wani S; Triantafyllou K; Tziatzios G; Cannizzaro R; Muscatiello N; Singh S
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Dec; 90(6):893-903.e7. PubMed ID: 31310744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.