These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

390 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33036222)

  • 21. Evaluation of Pancreatic Lesions With Endoscopic Ultrasound and Fine Needle Aspiration.
    Luk Y; She WH; Chow FCL; Ma KW; Tsang SHY; Dai WC; Cheung TT; Lo CM
    Surg Innov; 2020 Oct; 27(5):431-438. PubMed ID: 32476606
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: 22-gauge aspiration versus 25-gauge biopsy needles.
    Yang MJ; Yim H; Hwang JC; Lee D; Kim YB; Lim SG; Kim SS; Kang JK; Yoo BM; Kim JH
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2015 Sep; 15():122. PubMed ID: 26419845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Role of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for diagnosis of solid pancreatic masses.
    Yoshinaga S; Suzuki H; Oda I; Saito Y
    Dig Endosc; 2011 May; 23 Suppl 1():29-33. PubMed ID: 21535197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Diagnostic value of SpyGlass for pancreatic cystic lesions: comparison of EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration and EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration combined with SpyGlass.
    Du C; Chai N; Linghu E; Li H; Feng X; Wang X; Tang P
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Feb; 36(2):904-910. PubMed ID: 33650000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound (CH-EUS) MASTER: A novel deep learning-based system in pancreatic mass diagnosis.
    Tang A; Tian L; Gao K; Liu R; Hu S; Liu J; Xu J; Fu T; Zhang Z; Wang W; Zeng L; Qu W; Dai Y; Hou R; Tang S; Wang X
    Cancer Med; 2023 Apr; 12(7):7962-7973. PubMed ID: 36606571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Increasing Number of Passes Beyond 4 Does Not Increase Sensitivity of Detection of Pancreatic Malignancy by Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration.
    Mohamadnejad M; Mullady D; Early DS; Collins B; Marshall C; Sams S; Yen R; Rizeq M; Romanas M; Nawaz S; Ulusarac O; Hollander T; Wilson RH; Simon VC; Kushnir V; Amateau SK; Brauer BC; Gaddam S; Azar RR; Komanduri S; Shah R; Das A; Edmundowicz S; Muthusamy VR; Rastogi A; Wani S
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2017 Jul; 15(7):1071-1078.e2. PubMed ID: 28025154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. In memoriam: Fine-needle aspiration, birth: Fine-needle biopsy: The changing trend in endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition.
    Bang JY; Kirtane S; Krall K; Navaneethan U; Hasan M; Hawes R; Varadarajulu S
    Dig Endosc; 2019 Mar; 31(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 30256458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of the Diagnostic Performance of Newly Designed 21-Gauge and Standard 22-Gauge Aspiration Needles in Patients with Solid Pancreatic Masses.
    Minaga K; Yoshikawa T; Yamashita Y; Akamatsu H; Ikenouchi M; Ishii T; Matsumoto H; Iwagami H; Nakatani Y; Hatamaru K; Takenaka M; Akamatsu T; Uenoyama Y; Watanabe T; Ono K; Chiba Y; Kudo M
    Dig Dis Sci; 2019 Oct; 64(10):2982-2991. PubMed ID: 31011943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Core biopsy needle versus standard aspiration needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a randomized parallel-group study.
    Lee YN; Moon JH; Kim HK; Choi HJ; Choi MH; Kim DC; Lee TH; Cha SW; Cho YD; Park SH
    Endoscopy; 2014 Dec; 46(12):1056-62. PubMed ID: 25098611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Factors affecting the accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for the diagnosis of small (≤20 mm) pancreatic lesions.
    Li HZ; Peng CY; Shen SS; Wang L; Zhang S; Xu GF; Kong B; Friess H; Zou XP; Lv Y
    J Dig Dis; 2020 Jul; 21(7):416-421. PubMed ID: 32418326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in the diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions: a retrospective study.
    Hou X; Jin Z; Xu C; Zhang M; Zhu J; Jiang F; Li Z
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0121236. PubMed ID: 25793739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Impact of inconclusive endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration results in the management and outcome of patients with solid pancreatic masses.
    Sun B; Yang X; Ping B; He Y; Zhang Z
    Dig Endosc; 2015 Jan; 27(1):130-6. PubMed ID: 24837987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Prospective histological evaluation of a 20G core trap with a forward-cutting bevel needle for EUS-FNA of pancreatic lesions.
    Nishioka N; Ogura T; Kurisu Y; Imanishi M; Onda S; Takagi W; Sano T; Okuda A; Miyano A; Amano M; Higuchi K
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Oct; 32(10):4125-4131. PubMed ID: 29603000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison between two types of needles for Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine aspiration biopsy of pancreatic and upper gastrointestinal masses.
    Alkhateeb K; Lee BB; Alatassi H; Sanders MA; Omer EM; McClave SA; Fraig M
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2020 Mar; 48(3):197-202. PubMed ID: 31850666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Retrospective analysis of the utility of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) in pancreatic masses, using a 22-gauge or 25-gauge needle system: a multicenter experience.
    Yusuf TE; Ho S; Pavey DA; Michael H; Gress FG
    Endoscopy; 2009 May; 41(5):445-8. PubMed ID: 19418399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Diagnostic efficacy of liquid-based cytology for solid pancreatic lesion samples obtained with endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration: Propensity score-matched analysis.
    Hashimoto S; Taguchi H; Higashi M; Hatanaka K; Fujita T; Iwaya H; Nakazawa J; Arima S; Iwashita Y; Sasaki F; Nasu Y; Kanmura S; Ido A
    Dig Endosc; 2017 Jul; 29(5):608-616. PubMed ID: 28160342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A randomized controlled cross-over trial and cost analysis comparing endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration and fine needle biopsy.
    Aadam AA; Wani S; Amick A; Shah JN; Bhat YM; Hamerski CM; Klapman JB; Muthusamy VR; Watson RR; Rademaker AW; Keswani RN; Keefer L; Das A; Komanduri S
    Endosc Int Open; 2016 May; 4(5):E497-505. PubMed ID: 27227104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Clinical Utility of the Contrast-Enhanced Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Fine Needle Aspiration in the Diagnosis of Pancreatic Cyst.
    Olar MP; Bolboacă SD; Pojoga C; Moșteanu O; Gheorghiu M; Seicean R; Rusu I; Sparchez Z; Al Hajjar N; Seicean A
    Diagnostics (Basel); 2022 Sep; 12(9):. PubMed ID: 36140610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparing endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) versus fine needle biopsy (FNB) in the diagnosis of solid lesions: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Wang J; Wu X; Yin P; Guo Q; Hou W; Li Y; Wang Y; Cheng B
    Trials; 2016 Apr; 17():198. PubMed ID: 27071386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue sampling by combined fine needle aspiration and trucut needle biopsy: a prospective study.
    Wittmann J; Kocjan G; Sgouros SN; Deheragoda M; Pereira SP
    Cytopathology; 2006 Feb; 17(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 16417562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.