These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33037321)

  • 1. Results of a project to calibrate mercury sphygmomanometer blood pressure-measuring devices in Egypt.
    Ghareeb S; Youssef G; Ghareeb HS; El-Mageed HA; Mesalm MH; Talaat R; Eltawil A; Hasan DM; Ibrahim MM
    J Hum Hypertens; 2021 Oct; 35(10):921-926. PubMed ID: 33037321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hidden errors of aneroid sphygmomanometers.
    Waugh JJ; Gupta M; Rushbrook J; Halligan A; Shennan AH
    Blood Press Monit; 2002 Dec; 7(6):309-12. PubMed ID: 12488650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Can an automatic oscillometric device replace a mercury sphygmomanometer on blood pressure measurement? a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Park SH; Park YS
    Blood Press Monit; 2019 Dec; 24(6):265-276. PubMed ID: 31658107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Alternatives to the mercury sphygmomanometer.
    Buchanan S; Orris P; Karliner J
    J Public Health Policy; 2011 Feb; 32(1):107-20. PubMed ID: 21109765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Are aneroid sphygmomanometers accurate in hospital and clinic settings?
    Canzanello VJ; Jensen PL; Schwartz GL
    Arch Intern Med; 2001 Mar; 161(5):729-31. PubMed ID: 11231706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Which is More Accurate in Measuring the Blood Pressure? A Digital or an Aneroid Sphygmomanometer.
    Shahbabu B; Dasgupta A; Sarkar K; Sahoo SK
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2016 Mar; 10(3):LC11-4. PubMed ID: 27134902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validation of three oscillometric blood pressure devices against auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer in children.
    Wong SN; Tz Sung RY; Leung LC
    Blood Press Monit; 2006 Oct; 11(5):281-91. PubMed ID: 16932037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Blood pressure measurement in pediatric population: comparison between automated oscillometric devices and mercury sphygmomanometers-a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Araujo-Moura K; Souza LG; Mello GL; De Moraes ACF
    Eur J Pediatr; 2022 Jan; 181(1):9-22. PubMed ID: 34272985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Consistency between the electronic and mercury sphygmomanometer in children and adolescents on blood pressure measuring].
    Cao Q; Li D; Yu W; Guo Q; Zhao L; Yu D; Wang Y
    Wei Sheng Yan Jiu; 2016 Sep; 45(5):758-765. PubMed ID: 29903127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy of the pressure scale of sphygmomanometers in clinical use within primary care.
    Coleman AJ; Steel SD; Ashworth M; Vowler SL; Shennan A
    Blood Press Monit; 2005 Aug; 10(4):181-8. PubMed ID: 16077263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A survey to gauge confidence of Indian clinicians on three primary devices for blood pressure measurement.
    Kumar R; Sahani AK; Wander GS
    Blood Press Monit; 2021 Jun; 26(3):196-199. PubMed ID: 33470647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison between blood pressure readings using a mercury versus an aneroid sphygmomanometer.
    Farhan K; Naqvi STS; Rizvi SAH; Zafar A; Rawala MS
    Blood Press Monit; 2020 Feb; 25(1):34-38. PubMed ID: 31764009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Can electronic sphygmomanometers be used for measurement of blood pressure at high altitudes?
    Li S; Zhao X; Ba S; He F; Lam CT; Ke L; Li N; Yan LL; Li X; Wu Y
    Blood Press Monit; 2012 Apr; 17(2):62-8. PubMed ID: 22343751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Calibration of blood pressure data after replacement of the standard mercury sphygmomanometer by an oscillometric device and concurrent change of cuffs.
    Neuhauser HK; Ellert U; Thamm M; Adler C
    Blood Press Monit; 2015 Feb; 20(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 25144600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validation of the Omron M6 (HEM-7001-E) upper-arm blood pressure measuring device according to the International Protocol in adults and obese adults.
    Altunkan S; Ilman N; Kayatürk N; Altunkan E
    Blood Press Monit; 2007 Aug; 12(4):219-25. PubMed ID: 17625394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Comparative study on electronic sphygmomanometer and mercury sphygmomanometer among adults in the field study].
    Yu D; Li D; Guo Q; Yu W; Xu X; Zhao L
    Wei Sheng Yan Jiu; 2015 Nov; 44(6):914-7. PubMed ID: 26738382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Blood pressure-measuring devices in rural South Africa: an audit conducted by the SASPI team in the Agincourt field site.
    Connor MD; Hopkins T; Tollman SM; Thorogood M; Modi G
    Cardiovasc J S Afr; 2006; 17(4):192-6. PubMed ID: 17001422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of correlation between digital vs. mercury sphygmomanometer in a middle-income country: The role of socio-economic situation.
    Khosravi A; Behjati M; Mansouri A; Jozan M; Mohammadifard N; Taheri M; Khodarahmi S; Ansari R; Mansouri MH; Mansouri P; Sarrafzadegan N
    Clin Exp Hypertens; 2022 Feb; 44(2):113-118. PubMed ID: 34923883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validation of Missouri aneroid sphygmomanometer to measure blood pressure in patients with cancer.
    Ferreira KA; Santos AC; Arthur TC; Santos DA; Pereira D; Freitas EO; Fukuda FM; Baia WR
    Arq Bras Cardiol; 2010 Aug; 95(2):244-50. PubMed ID: 20658091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of two sphygmomanometers that may replace the traditional mercury column in the healthcare workplace.
    Elliott WJ; Young PE; DeVivo L; Feldstein J; Black HR
    Blood Press Monit; 2007 Feb; 12(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 17303984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.