131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33037690)
1. Multi-hypothesis comparison of Farquhar and Collatz photosynthesis models reveals the unexpected influence of empirical assumptions at leaf and global scales.
Walker AP; Johnson AL; Rogers A; Anderson J; Bridges RA; Fisher RA; Lu D; Ricciuto DM; Serbin SP; Ye M
Glob Chang Biol; 2021 Feb; 27(4):804-822. PubMed ID: 33037690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. No evidence for triose phosphate limitation of light-saturated leaf photosynthesis under current atmospheric CO
Kumarathunge DP; Medlyn BE; Drake JE; Rogers A; Tjoelker MG
Plant Cell Environ; 2019 Dec; 42(12):3241-3252. PubMed ID: 31378950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of leaf-level spatial variability in photosynthetic capacity on biochemical parameter estimates using the Farquhar model: a theoretical analysis.
Chen CP; Zhu XG; Long SP
Plant Physiol; 2008 Oct; 148(2):1139-47. PubMed ID: 18715955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The sensitivity of photosynthesis to O
Busch FA; Sage RF
New Phytol; 2017 Feb; 213(3):1036-1051. PubMed ID: 27768823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The phenology of leaf quality and its within-canopy variation is essential for accurate modeling of photosynthesis in tropical evergreen forests.
Wu J; Serbin SP; Xu X; Albert LP; Chen M; Meng R; Saleska SR; Rogers A
Glob Chang Biol; 2017 Nov; 23(11):4814-4827. PubMed ID: 28418158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Terrestrial biosphere models underestimate photosynthetic capacity and CO
Rogers A; Serbin SP; Ely KS; Sloan VL; Wullschleger SD
New Phytol; 2017 Dec; 216(4):1090-1103. PubMed ID: 28877330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A roadmap for improving the representation of photosynthesis in Earth system models.
Rogers A; Medlyn BE; Dukes JS; Bonan G; von Caemmerer S; Dietze MC; Kattge J; Leakey AD; Mercado LM; Niinemets Ü; Prentice IC; Serbin SP; Sitch S; Way DA; Zaehle S
New Phytol; 2017 Jan; 213(1):22-42. PubMed ID: 27891647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reliable estimation of biochemical parameters from C₃ leaf photosynthesis-intercellular carbon dioxide response curves.
Gu L; Pallardy SG; Tu K; Law BE; Wullschleger SD
Plant Cell Environ; 2010 Nov; 33(11):1852-74. PubMed ID: 20561254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Estimation of parameters of a biochemically based model of photosynthesis using a genetic algorithm.
Su Y; Zhu G; Miao Z; Feng Q; Chang Z
Plant Cell Environ; 2009 Dec; 32(12):1710-23. PubMed ID: 19703116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sensitivity analysis and estimation using a hierarchical Bayesian method for the parameters of the FvCB biochemical photosynthetic model.
Han T; Zhu G; Ma J; Wang S; Zhang K; Liu X; Ma T; Shang S; Huang C
Photosynth Res; 2020 Jan; 143(1):45-66. PubMed ID: 31659624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Terrestrial biosphere models may overestimate Arctic CO
Rogers A; Serbin SP; Ely KS; Wullschleger SD
New Phytol; 2019 Jul; 223(1):167-179. PubMed ID: 30767227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Surfing the Hyperbola Equations of the Steady-State Farquhar-von Caemmerer-Berry C
Miranda-Apodaca J; Marcos-Barbero EL; Morcuende R; Arellano JB
Bull Math Biol; 2019 Dec; 82(1):3. PubMed ID: 31919660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fitting photosynthetic carbon dioxide response curves for C(3) leaves.
Sharkey TD; Bernacchi CJ; Farquhar GD; Singsaas EL
Plant Cell Environ; 2007 Sep; 30(9):1035-40. PubMed ID: 17661745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evolution of a biochemical model of steady-state photosynthesis.
Yin X; Busch FA; Struik PC; Sharkey TD
Plant Cell Environ; 2021 Sep; 44(9):2811-2837. PubMed ID: 33872407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Modelling photosynthesis in flag leaves of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) considering the variation in photosynthesis parameters during development.
Sun J; Sun J; Feng Z
Funct Plant Biol; 2015 Nov; 42(11):1036-1044. PubMed ID: 32480743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Major diffusion leaks of clamp-on leaf cuvettes still unaccounted: how erroneous are the estimates of Farquhar et al. model parameters?
Rodeghiero M; Niinemets U; Cescatti A
Plant Cell Environ; 2007 Aug; 30(8):1006-22. PubMed ID: 17617828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the A-Cc curve fitting methods in determining maximum ribulose 1.5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase carboxylation rate, potential light saturated electron transport rate and leaf dark respiration.
Miao Z; Xu M; Lathrop RG; Wang Y
Plant Cell Environ; 2009 Feb; 32(2):109-22. PubMed ID: 19154228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Using combined measurements of gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence to estimate parameters of a biochemical C photosynthesis model: a critical appraisal and a new integrated approach applied to leaves in a wheat (Triticum aestivum) canopy.
Yin X; Struik PC; Romero P; Harbinson J; Evers JB; VAN DER Putten PE; Vos J
Plant Cell Environ; 2009 May; 32(5):448-64. PubMed ID: 19183300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Modelling (18)O2 and (16)O2 unidirectional fluxes in plants. III: fitting of experimental data by a simple model.
André MJ
Biosystems; 2013 Aug; 113(2):104-14. PubMed ID: 23153764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Key knowledge and data gaps in modelling the influence of CO
Pugh TAM; Müller C; Arneth A; Haverd V; Smith B
J Plant Physiol; 2016 Sep; 203():3-15. PubMed ID: 27233774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
