These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

672 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33038125)

  • 1. Methodological quality of case series studies: an introduction to the JBI critical appraisal tool.
    Munn Z; Barker TH; Moola S; Tufanaru C; Stern C; McArthur A; Stephenson M; Aromataris E
    JBI Evid Synth; 2020 Oct; 18(10):2127-2133. PubMed ID: 33038125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Conducting systematic reviews of economic evaluations.
    Gomersall JS; Jadotte YT; Xue Y; Lockwood S; Riddle D; Preda A
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2015 Sep; 13(3):170-8. PubMed ID: 26288063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews.
    Peters MDJ; Marnie C; Tricco AC; Pollock D; Munn Z; Alexander L; McInerney P; Godfrey CM; Khalil H
    JBI Evid Synth; 2020 Oct; 18(10):2119-2126. PubMed ID: 33038124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta-analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review.
    Zeng X; Zhang Y; Kwong JS; Zhang C; Li S; Sun F; Niu Y; Du L
    J Evid Based Med; 2015 Feb; 8(1):2-10. PubMed ID: 25594108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews.
    Peters MDJ; Marnie C; Tricco AC; Pollock D; Munn Z; Alexander L; McInerney P; Godfrey CM; Khalil H
    JBI Evid Implement; 2021 Mar; 19(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 33570328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing the risk of bias of quantitative analytical studies: introducing the vision for critical appraisal within JBI systematic reviews.
    Munn Z; Stone JC; Aromataris E; Klugar M; Sears K; Leonardi-Bee J; Barker TH
    JBI Evid Synth; 2023 Mar; 21(3):467-471. PubMed ID: 36476419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.
    Allen D; Gillen E; Rixson L
    JBI Libr Syst Rev; 2009; 7(3):80-129. PubMed ID: 27820426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Methodological guidance for the conduct of mixed methods systematic reviews.
    Stern C; Lizarondo L; Carrier J; Godfrey C; Rieger K; Salmond S; Apostolo J; Kirkpatrick P; Loveday H
    JBI Evid Implement; 2021 Jun; 19(2):120-129. PubMed ID: 34061049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Methodological guidance for the conduct of mixed methods systematic reviews.
    Stern C; Lizarondo L; Carrier J; Godfrey C; Rieger K; Salmond S; Apóstolo J; Kirkpatrick P; Loveday H
    JBI Evid Synth; 2020 Oct; 18(10):2108-2118. PubMed ID: 32813460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The revised JBI critical appraisal tool for the assessment of risk of bias for cohort studies.
    Barker TH; Hasanoff S; Aromataris E; Stone J; Leonardi-Bee J; Sears K; Habibi N; Klugar M; Tufanaru C; Moola S; Liu XL; Munn Z
    JBI Evid Synth; 2024 Aug; ():. PubMed ID: 39177422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Summarizing systematic reviews: methodological development, conduct and reporting of an umbrella review approach.
    Aromataris E; Fernandez R; Godfrey CM; Holly C; Khalil H; Tungpunkom P
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2015 Sep; 13(3):132-40. PubMed ID: 26360830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The revised JBI critical appraisal tool for the assessment of risk of bias for quasi-experimental studies.
    Barker TH; Habibi N; Aromataris E; Stone JC; Leonardi-Bee J; Sears K; Hasanoff S; Klugar M; Tufanaru C; Moola S; Munn Z
    JBI Evid Synth; 2024 Mar; 22(3):378-388. PubMed ID: 38287725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.
    Eddy K; Jordan Z; Stephenson M
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2016 Apr; 14(4):96-137. PubMed ID: 27532314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reporting quality and risk of bias in JBI systematic reviews evaluating the effectiveness of interventions: a methodological review protocol.
    Grammatopoulos T; Hunter JWS; Munn Z; Stone JC; Barker TH
    JBI Evid Synth; 2023 Mar; 21(3):584-591. PubMed ID: 36632760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?
    Allen D; Rixson L
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2008 Mar; 6(1):78-110. PubMed ID: 21631815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Critical appraisal of nonrandomized studies-A review of recommended and commonly used tools.
    Quigley JM; Thompson JC; Halfpenny NJ; Scott DA
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2019 Feb; 25(1):44-52. PubMed ID: 29484779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. From critical appraisal to risk of bias assessment: clarifying the terminology for study evaluation in JBI systematic reviews.
    Stone JC; Barker TH; Aromataris E; Ritskes-Hoitinga M; Sears K; Klugar M; Leonardi-Bee J; Munn Z
    JBI Evid Synth; 2023 Mar; 21(3):472-477. PubMed ID: 36882947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Revising the JBI quantitative critical appraisal tools to improve their applicability: an overview of methods and the development process.
    Barker TH; Stone JC; Sears K; Klugar M; Leonardi-Bee J; Tufanaru C; Aromataris E; Munn Z
    JBI Evid Synth; 2023 Mar; 21(3):478-493. PubMed ID: 36121230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The "quality" of JBI qualitative research synthesis: a methodological investigation into the adherence of meta-aggregative systematic reviews to reporting standards and methodological guidance.
    Munn Z; Dias M; Tufanaru C; Porritt K; Stern C; Jordan Z; Aromataris E; Pearson A
    JBI Evid Synth; 2021 May; 19(5):1119-1139. PubMed ID: 33989268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management, part I: introduction and general considerations.
    Manchikanti L
    Pain Physician; 2008; 11(2):161-86. PubMed ID: 18354710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 34.