These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
672 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33038125)
21. Review of guidelines for good practice in decision-analytic modelling in health technology assessment. Philips Z; Ginnelly L; Sculpher M; Claxton K; Golder S; Riemsma R; Woolacoot N; Glanville J Health Technol Assess; 2004 Sep; 8(36):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-158. PubMed ID: 15361314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect? Allen D; Rixson L JBI Libr Syst Rev; 2008; 6(15):583-632. PubMed ID: 27819972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Critical appraisal in ecology: What tools are available, and what is being used in systematic reviews? Stanhope J; Weinstein P Res Synth Methods; 2023 May; 14(3):342-356. PubMed ID: 36303454 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The development of a critical appraisal tool for use in systematic reviews addressing questions of prevalence. Munn Z; Moola S; Riitano D; Lisy K Int J Health Policy Manag; 2014 Aug; 3(3):123-8. PubMed ID: 25197676 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Some notes on critical appraisal of prevalence studies: Comment on: "The development of a critical appraisal tool for use in systematic reviews addressing questions of prevalence". Harder T Int J Health Policy Manag; 2014 Oct; 3(5):289-90. PubMed ID: 25337603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The experience of adults who choose watchful waiting or active surveillance as an approach to medical treatment: a qualitative systematic review. Rittenmeyer L; Huffman D; Alagna M; Moore E JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2016 Feb; 14(2):174-255. PubMed ID: 27536798 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Abstract analysis method facilitates filtering low-methodological quality and high-bias risk systematic reviews on psoriasis interventions. Gómez-García F; Ruano J; Aguilar-Luque M; Alcalde-Mellado P; Gay-Mimbrera J; Hernández-Romero JL; Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Maestre-López B; González-Padilla M; Carmona-Fernández PJ; García-Nieto AV; Isla-Tejera B BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):180. PubMed ID: 29284417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Interventions to ensure medication safety in acute care: an umbrella review. Khalil H; Kynoch K; Hines S Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2020 Jun; 18(2):188-211. PubMed ID: 32487967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effectiveness and experience of arts-based pedagogy among undergraduate nursing students: a mixed methods systematic review. Rieger KL; Chernomas WM; McMillan DE; Morin FL; Demczuk L JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2016 Nov; 14(11):139-239. PubMed ID: 27941518 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Recommendations for assessing the risk of bias in systematic reviews of health-care interventions. Viswanathan M; Patnode CD; Berkman ND; Bass EB; Chang S; Hartling L; Murad MH; Treadwell JR; Kane RL J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 May; 97():26-34. PubMed ID: 29248724 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Evaluation of the reliability, usability, and applicability of AMSTAR, AMSTAR 2, and ROBIS: protocol for a descriptive analytic study. Gates A; Gates M; Duarte G; Cary M; Becker M; Prediger B; Vandermeer B; Fernandes RM; Pieper D; Hartling L Syst Rev; 2018 Jun; 7(1):85. PubMed ID: 29898777 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Methodological quality and risk-of-bias assessments in systematic reviews of treatments for peri-implantitis. Hasuike A; Ueno D; Nagashima H; Kubota T; Tsukune N; Watanabe N; Sato S J Periodontal Res; 2019 Aug; 54(4):374-387. PubMed ID: 30671962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The development and validation of a meta-tool for quality appraisal of public health evidence: Meta Quality Appraisal Tool (MetaQAT). Rosella L; Bowman C; Pach B; Morgan S; Fitzpatrick T; Goel V Public Health; 2016 Jul; 136():57-65. PubMed ID: 26993202 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Crowdsourcing critical appraisal of research evidence (CrowdCARE) was found to be a valid approach to assessing clinical research quality. Pianta MJ; Makrai E; Verspoor KM; Cohn TA; Downie LE J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Dec; 104():8-14. PubMed ID: 30075189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Ensuring rigor in systematic reviews: Part 7, critical appraisal of systematic review quality. Brackett A; Batten J Heart Lung; 2022; 53():32-35. PubMed ID: 35124337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Methodological quality and synthesis of case series and case reports. Murad MH; Sultan S; Haffar S; Bazerbachi F BMJ Evid Based Med; 2018 Apr; 23(2):60-63. PubMed ID: 29420178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany. Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Association between pacifier use and breast-feeding, sudden infant death syndrome, infection and dental malocclusion. Callaghan A; Kendall G; Lock C; Mahony A; Payne J; Verrier L JBI Libr Syst Rev; 2005; 3(6):1-33. PubMed ID: 27819973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Quality assessment with diverse studies (QuADS): an appraisal tool for methodological and reporting quality in systematic reviews of mixed- or multi-method studies. Harrison R; Jones B; Gardner P; Lawton R BMC Health Serv Res; 2021 Feb; 21(1):144. PubMed ID: 33588842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]