179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33038279)
1. Marginal and Internal Adaptation of Lithium Disilicate Endocrowns Fabricated By Heat-Pressable and Subtractive Techniques.
El Ghoul W; Salameh Z
J Prosthodont; 2021 Jul; 30(6):509-514. PubMed ID: 33038279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Marginal and internal fit of lithium disilicate endocrowns fabricated using conventional, digital, and combination techniques.
Abduljawad DE; Rayyan MR
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2022 Jun; 34(4):707-714. PubMed ID: 35294099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Effect of Different Wax Pattern Fabrication Techniques on the Marginal Fit of Customized Lithium Disilicate Implant Abutments.
Taha D; Nour M; Zohdy M; El-Etreby A; Hamdy A; Salah T
J Prosthodont; 2019 Dec; 28(9):1018-1023. PubMed ID: 31573716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of different CAD-CAM materials on the marginal and internal adaptation of endocrown restorations: An in vitro study.
El Ghoul WA; Özcan M; Ounsi H; Tohme H; Salameh Z
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jan; 123(1):128-134. PubMed ID: 31027958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. 3D and 2D marginal fit of pressed and CAD/CAM lithium disilicate crowns made from digital and conventional impressions.
Anadioti E; Aquilino SA; Gratton DG; Holloway JA; Denry I; Thomas GW; Qian F
J Prosthodont; 2014 Dec; 23(8):610-7. PubMed ID: 24995593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of Fabrication Technique on the Marginal Discrepancy and Resistance of Lithium Disilicate Crowns: An In Vitro Study.
Sadid-Zadeh R; Li R; Miller LM; Simon M
J Prosthodont; 2019 Dec; 28(9):1005-1010. PubMed ID: 30628147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Marginal and internal fit of pressed ceramic crowns made from conventional and computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing wax patterns: An in vitro comparison.
Shamseddine L; Mortada R; Rifai K; Chidiac JJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Aug; 116(2):242-8. PubMed ID: 26948080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of the Fit of Lithium Disilicate Crowns made from Conventional, Digital, or Conventional/Digital Techniques.
Al Hamad KQ; Al Rashdan BA; Al Omari WM; Baba NZ
J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e580-e586. PubMed ID: 30091168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fit Accuracy of Pressed and Milled Lithium Disilicate Inlays Fabricated From Conventional Impressions or a Laboratory-Based Digital Workflow.
Homsy F; Bottin M; Özcan M; Majzoub Z
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2019 Feb; 27(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 30779496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Marginal and internal fit of pressed lithium disilicate inlays fabricated with milling, 3D printing, and conventional technologies.
Homsy FR; Özcan M; Khoury M; Majzoub ZAK
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 May; 119(5):783-790. PubMed ID: 28969918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative evaluation of internal fit and marginal gap of endocrowns using lithium disilicate and polyether ether ketone materials - an in vitro study.
Nagi N; Fouda AM; Bourauel C
BMC Oral Health; 2023 Apr; 23(1):207. PubMed ID: 37029396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Failure loads of heat-pressed versus milled lithium disilicate endocrowns.
Shafi MA; Rayyan MR
Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Jan; 27(1):339-344. PubMed ID: 36197546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Micro-computed tomography evaluation of marginal fit of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated by using chairside CAD/CAM systems or the heat-pressing technique.
Neves FD; Prado CJ; Prudente MS; Carneiro TA; Zancopé K; Davi LR; Mendonça G; Cooper LF; Soares CJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1134-40. PubMed ID: 24969409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of Marginal and Internal Fit of CAD/CAM Endocrowns with Different Cavity Tapers.
Hajimahmoudi M; Raseipour S; Mroue M; Ghodsi S
Int J Prosthodont; 2023 May; 36(2):189-193. PubMed ID: 33625391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of fit accuracy of pressed lithium disilicate inlays fabricated from wax or resin patterns with conventional and CAD-CAM technologies.
Homsy FR; Özcan M; Khoury M; Majzoub ZAK
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Oct; 120(4):530-536. PubMed ID: 30318049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Microstructure, topography, surface roughness, fractal dimension, internal and marginal adaptation of pressed and milled lithium-disilicate monolithic restorations.
Schestatsky R; Zucuni CP; Dapieve KS; Burgo TAL; Spazzin AO; Bacchi A; Valandro LF; Pereira GKR
J Prosthodont Res; 2020 Jan; 64(1):12-19. PubMed ID: 31213364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Production tolerance of conventional and digital workflow in the manufacturing of glass ceramic crowns.
Mahmood DJH; Braian M; Larsson C; Wennerberg A
Dent Mater; 2019 Mar; 35(3):486-494. PubMed ID: 30686710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of firing and fabrication technique on the marginal fit of heat-pressed lithium disilicate veneers.
Gakis P; Kontogiorgos E; Zeller S; Nagy WW
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Jan; 127(1):154-160. PubMed ID: 33341255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fit of pressed crowns fabricated from two CAD-CAM wax pattern process plans: A comparative in vitro study.
Shamseddine L; Mortada R; Rifai K; Chidiac JJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jul; 118(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 28024815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of marginal fit between CAD-CAM and hot-press lithium disilicate crowns.
Dolev E; Bitterman Y; Meirowitz A
J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Jan; 121(1):124-128. PubMed ID: 29961628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
