These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33038503)

  • 1. Real-world experiences with generating real-world evidence: Case Studies from PCORI's pragmatic clinical Studies program.
    Neuman MD; Kappelman MD; Israel E; Ellenberg SS; Girman C; Robb J; Rabinowitz A; Trontell A
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2020 Nov; 98():106171. PubMed ID: 33038503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Use of PRECIS ratings in the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Health Care Systems Research Collaboratory.
    Johnson KE; Neta G; Dember LM; Coronado GD; Suls J; Chambers DA; Rundell S; Smith DH; Liu B; Taplin S; Stoney CM; Farrell MM; Glasgow RE
    Trials; 2016 Jan; 17():32. PubMed ID: 26772801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An overview and discussion of the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute's decision aid portfolio.
    Gayer CC; Crowley MJ; Lawrence WF; Gierisch JM; Gaglio B; Williams JW; Myers ER; Kendrick A; Slutsky J; Sanders GD
    J Comp Eff Res; 2016 Jul; 5(4):407-15. PubMed ID: 27298206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.
    Allen D; Gillen E; Rixson L
    JBI Libr Syst Rev; 2009; 7(3):80-129. PubMed ID: 27820426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Facing the Realities of Pragmatic Design Choices in Environmental Health Studies: Experiences from the Household Air Pollution Intervention Network Trial.
    Checkley W; Hossen S; Rosa G; Thompson LM; McCracken JP; Diaz-Artiga A; Balakrishnan K; Simkovich SM; Underhill LJ; Nicolaou L; Hartinger SM; Davila-Roman VG; Kirby MA; Clasen TF; Rosenthal J; Peel JL; On Behalf Of Household Air Pollution Intervention Network Hapin Investigators
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Mar; 19(7):. PubMed ID: 35409475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Catalyzing the Translation of Patient-Centered Research Into United States Trauma Care Systems: A Case Example.
    Zatzick D; Moloney K; Palinkas L; Thomas P; Anderson K; Whiteside L; Nehra D; Bulger E
    Med Care; 2021 Aug; 59(Suppl 4):S379-S386. PubMed ID: 34228020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A dynamic application of PRECIS-2 to evaluate implementation in a pragmatic, cluster randomized clinical trial in two nursing home systems.
    Palmer JA; Mor V; Volandes AE; McCreedy E; Loomer L; Carter P; Dvorchak F; Mitchell SL
    Trials; 2018 Aug; 19(1):453. PubMed ID: 30134976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Primary Care Research in the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute's Portfolio.
    Selby JV; Slutsky JR
    Acad Med; 2016 Apr; 91(4):453-4. PubMed ID: 26862842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Informing real-world practice with real-world evidence: the value of PRECIS-2.
    Neta G; Johnson KE
    BMC Med; 2018 May; 16(1):76. PubMed ID: 29783964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Conceptual and practical foundations of patient engagement in research at the patient-centered outcomes research institute.
    Frank L; Forsythe L; Ellis L; Schrandt S; Sheridan S; Gerson J; Konopka K; Daugherty S
    Qual Life Res; 2015 May; 24(5):1033-41. PubMed ID: 25560774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Real-world evidence: How pragmatic are randomized controlled trials labeled as pragmatic?
    Dal-Ré R; Janiaud P; Ioannidis JPA
    BMC Med; 2018 Apr; 16(1):49. PubMed ID: 29615035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Series: Pragmatic trials and real world evidence: Paper 6. Outcome measures in the real world.
    Welsing PM; Oude Rengerink K; Collier S; Eckert L; van Smeden M; Ciaglia A; Nachbaur G; Trelle S; Taylor AJ; Egger M; Goetz I;
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Oct; 90():99-107. PubMed ID: 28502810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Statistical Considerations for the Design and Analysis of Pragmatic Trials in Aging Research.
    Kammar-García A; Fernández-Urrutia LA; Guevara-Díaz JA; Mancilla-Galindo J
    Geriatrics (Basel); 2024 Jun; 9(3):. PubMed ID: 38920431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Building internal capacity in pragmatic trials: a workshop for program scientists at the US National Cancer Institute.
    Norton WE; Zwarenstein M; Czajkowski S; Kato E; O'Mara A; Shelburne N; Chambers DA; Loudon K
    Trials; 2019 Dec; 20(1):779. PubMed ID: 31881919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Statistical lessons learned for designing cluster randomized pragmatic clinical trials from the NIH Health Care Systems Collaboratory Biostatistics and Design Core.
    Cook AJ; Delong E; Murray DM; Vollmer WM; Heagerty PJ
    Clin Trials; 2016 Oct; 13(5):504-12. PubMed ID: 27179253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.
    Sinclair P; Kable A; Levett-Jones T
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Jan; 13(1):52-64. PubMed ID: 26447007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hybrid clinical trials to generate real-world evidence: design considerations from a sponsor's perspective.
    Zhu M; Sridhar S; Hollingsworth R; Chit A; Kimball T; Murmello K; Greenberg M; Gurunathan S; Chen J
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2020 Jul; 94():105856. PubMed ID: 31669449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?
    Allen D; Rixson L
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2008 Mar; 6(1):78-110. PubMed ID: 21631815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pragmatic trial design elements showed a different impact on trial interpretation and feasibility than explanatory elements.
    Nieuwenhuis JB; Irving E; Oude Rengerink K; Lloyd E; Goetz I; Grobbee DE; Stolk P; Groenwold RH; Zuidgeest MG;
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Sep; 77():95-100. PubMed ID: 27164273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How different is research done by the Patient-centered Outcomes Research Institute, and what difference does it make?
    Luce BR; Simeone JC
    J Comp Eff Res; 2019 Oct; 8(14):1239-1251. PubMed ID: 31436471
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.