These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33038617)

  • 1. The novel use of a spray-on rubber coating to recover cellular material from the surface of bricks.
    Cahill MJ; Chapman B
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Nov; 49():102404. PubMed ID: 33038617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of six adhesive tapes as tape lifts for efficient trace DNA recovery without the transfer of PCR inhibitors.
    Hymus CM; Baxter FO; Ta H; Tran T; de Sousa C; Mountford NS; Tay JW
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2024 Mar; 67():102330. PubMed ID: 37802731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The use of the M-Vac® wet-vacuum system as a method for DNA recovery.
    Vickar T; Bache K; Daniel B; Frascione N
    Sci Justice; 2018 Jul; 58(4):282-286. PubMed ID: 29895461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Increased recovery of touch DNA evidence using FTA paper compared to conventional collection methods.
    Kirgiz IA; Calloway C
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2017 Apr; 47():9-15. PubMed ID: 28171796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Nondestructive Biological Evidence Collection with Alternative Swabs and Adhesive Lifters.
    Plaza DT; Mealy JL; Lane JN; Parsons MN; Bathrick AS; Slack DP
    J Forensic Sci; 2016 Mar; 61(2):485-488. PubMed ID: 27404622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An assessment of tape-lifts.
    Kanokwongnuwut P; Paul Kirkbride K; Linacre A
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Jul; 47():102292. PubMed ID: 32248081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Recovery of Trace DNA on Clothing: A Comparison of Mini-tape Lifting and Three Other Forensic Evidence Collection Techniques.
    Hess S; Haas C
    J Forensic Sci; 2017 Jan; 62(1):187-191. PubMed ID: 27864934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Enhanced forensic DNA recovery with appropriate swabs and optimized swabbing technique.
    Hedman J; Akel Y; Jansson L; Hedell R; Wallmark N; Forsberg C; Ansell R
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 Jul; 53():102491. PubMed ID: 33774569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. DNA recovery from unfired and fired cartridge cases: A comparison of swabbing, tape lifting, vacuum filtration, and direct PCR.
    Prasad E; Hitchcock C; Raymond J; Cole A; Barash M; Gunn P; McNevin D; van Oorschot RAH
    Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Dec; 317():110507. PubMed ID: 32977300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of the microbial wet-vacuum system (M-Vac®) for DNA sampling from rough, porous substrates, and its compatibility with fully automated platforms.
    Blackmore L; Hadley Cabral de Almada C; Poulsen F; Prasad E; Kotzander J; Paton K; Hitchcock C; Nadort A
    Forensic Sci Int; 2024 May; 361():112079. PubMed ID: 38850613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of different methods of DNA recovery and PCR amplification in STR profiling of casings-a retrospective study.
    Radojicic V; Keckarevic Markovic M; Puac F; Kecmanovic M; Keckarevic D
    Int J Legal Med; 2018 Nov; 132(6):1575-1580. PubMed ID: 29536195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of DNA recovery on the subsequent quality of latent fingermarks.
    Fieldhouse S; Oravcova E; Walton-Williams L
    Forensic Sci Int; 2016 Oct; 267():78-88. PubMed ID: 27572637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of Isohelix™ and Rayon swabbing systems for touch DNA recovery from metal surfaces.
    Bonsu DOM; Rodie M; Higgins D; Henry J; Austin JJ
    Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2021 Dec; 17(4):577-584. PubMed ID: 34674113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Trace DNA Sampling Success from Evidence Items Commonly Encountered in Forensic Casework.
    Dziak R; Peneder A; Buetter A; Hageman C
    J Forensic Sci; 2018 May; 63(3):835-841. PubMed ID: 28921603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Combined DNA Typing and Protein Identification from Unfired Brass Cartridges,,
    Sterling SA; Mason KE; Anex DS; Parker GJ; Hart B; Prinz M
    J Forensic Sci; 2019 Sep; 64(5):1475-1481. PubMed ID: 30893480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the M-Vac
    McLamb JM; Adams LD; Kavlick MF
    J Forensic Sci; 2020 Nov; 65(6):1828-1834. PubMed ID: 32687222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ocular swabs on exhumed bodies: An alternative to the collection of "classical" tissue samples in forensic genetics.
    Agostini V; Bailo P; Chiti E; Linarello P; Gentile G; Primignani P; Giriodi M; Piccinini A
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Jan; 44():102206. PubMed ID: 31765878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Systematic study for DNA recovery and profiling from common IED substrates: From laboratory to casework.
    Phetpeng S; Kitpipit T; Thanakiatkrai P
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 Jul; 17():53-60. PubMed ID: 25828367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use of a commercially available hydrogel as a novel DNA surface sampling tool.
    Sekowski JW; Simmons B; Lal-Paterson A; Armstrong J; Rastogi VK; Angelini DJ
    J Forensic Sci; 2023 Jul; 68(4):1310-1316. PubMed ID: 37248532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The influence of swabbing solutions on DNA recovery from touch samples.
    Thomasma SM; Foran DR
    J Forensic Sci; 2013 Mar; 58(2):465-9. PubMed ID: 23278347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.