These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33038617)

  • 21. Assessing DNA recovery and profile determination from bloody snow.
    Biggin MRK; Albrecht I; Novroski NMM
    Sci Justice; 2022 Mar; 62(2):152-155. PubMed ID: 35277228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. "Getting blood from a stone": ultrasensitive forensic DNA profiling of microscopic bio-particles recovered from "touch DNA" evidence.
    Hanson EK; Ballantyne J
    Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 1039():3-17. PubMed ID: 24026682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Touch DNA recovery from unfired and fired cartridges: Comparison of swabbing, tape lifting and soaking.
    Prasad E; Hitchcock C; Raymond J; Cole A; Barash M; McNevin D; van Oorschot RAH
    Forensic Sci Int; 2022 Jan; 330():111101. PubMed ID: 34801815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Casework direct kit as an alternative extraction method to enhance touch DNA samples analysis.
    Francisco DO; Lopez LF; Gonçalves FT; Fridman C
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Jul; 47():102307. PubMed ID: 32447230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Cell counting to monitor swab efficiency.
    Nolan M; Linacre A
    J Forensic Sci; 2024 May; 69(3):1002-1010. PubMed ID: 38380584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evaluation of the efficiency of Isohelix™ and Rayon swabs for recovery of DNA from metal surfaces.
    Bonsu DOM; Higgins D; Henry J; Austin JJ
    Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2021 Jun; 17(2):199-207. PubMed ID: 33180274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Trace evidence characteristics of DNA: A preliminary investigation of the persistence of DNA at crime scenes.
    Raymond JJ; van Oorschot RA; Gunn PR; Walsh SJ; Roux C
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2009 Dec; 4(1):26-33. PubMed ID: 19948331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Recovery of DNA from acetaminophen exploring physical state and sampling methods.
    Bertram AM; Conlan XA; van Oorschot RAH; Durdle A
    Forensic Sci Int; 2024 Jul; 360():112046. PubMed ID: 38718526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Direct PCR Improves the Recovery of DNA from Various Substrates.
    Templeton JE; Taylor D; Handt O; Skuza P; Linacre A
    J Forensic Sci; 2015 Nov; 60(6):1558-62. PubMed ID: 26264133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Direct PCR amplification of DNA from human bloodstains, saliva, and touch samples collected with microFLOQ
    Ambers A; Wiley R; Novroski N; Budowle B
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Jan; 32():80-87. PubMed ID: 29126000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Use of a Spray Device to Locate Touch DNA on Casework Samples.
    Young JM; Linacre A
    J Forensic Sci; 2020 Jul; 65(4):1280-1288. PubMed ID: 32092781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Looking for the pinpoint: Optimizing identification, recovery and DNA extraction of micro traces in forensic casework.
    Dierig L; Schmidt M; Wiegand P
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Jan; 44():102191. PubMed ID: 31756628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. In-field collection and preservation of decomposing human tissues to facilitate rapid purification and STR typing.
    Holmes AS; Roman MG; Hughes-Stamm S
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Sep; 36():124-129. PubMed ID: 29990824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Electrostatic sampling of trace DNA from clothing.
    Zieger M; Defaux PM; Utz S
    Int J Legal Med; 2016 May; 130(3):661-7. PubMed ID: 26753871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Analysis of fingerprint samples, testing various conditions, for forensic DNA identification.
    Ostojic L; Wurmbach E
    Sci Justice; 2017 Jan; 57(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 28063583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The Extraction and Recovery Efficiency of Pure DNA for Different Types of Swabs.
    Bruijns BB; Tiggelaar RM; Gardeniers H
    J Forensic Sci; 2018 Sep; 63(5):1492-1499. PubMed ID: 29890011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. High-throughput DNA extraction of forensic adhesive tapes.
    Forsberg C; Jansson L; Ansell R; Hedman J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Sep; 24():158-163. PubMed ID: 27448236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Forensic touch DNA recovery from metal surfaces - A review.
    Bonsu DOM; Higgins D; Austin JJ
    Sci Justice; 2020 May; 60(3):206-215. PubMed ID: 32381237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. An economical and efficient method for postmortem DNA sampling in mass fatalities.
    Mundorff AZ; Amory S; Huel R; Bilić A; Scott AL; Parsons TJ
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Sep; 36():167-175. PubMed ID: 30032092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluation of a novel material, Diomics X-Swab™, for collection of DNA.
    Marshall PL; Stoljarova M; Larue BL; King JL; Budowle B
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Sep; 12():192-8. PubMed ID: 25016249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.