These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
42. The admission CTG: is there any evidence for still using the test? Blix E Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2013 Jun; 92(6):613-9. PubMed ID: 23362805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Electronic fetal monitoring: past, present, and future. Stout MJ; Cahill AG Clin Perinatol; 2011 Mar; 38(1):127-42, vii. PubMed ID: 21353094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. A randomised controlled trial of admission electronic fetal monitoring in normal labour. Cheyne H; Dunlop A; Shields N; Mathers AM Midwifery; 2003 Sep; 19(3):221-9. PubMed ID: 12946338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Randomised controlled trial of cardiotocography versus Doppler auscultation of fetal heart at admission in labour in low risk obstetric population. Mires G; Williams F; Howie P BMJ; 2001 Jun; 322(7300):1457-60; discussion 1460-2. PubMed ID: 11408301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. What we have learned about intrapartum fetal monitoring trials in the MFMU Network. Bloom SL; Belfort M; Saade G; Semin Perinatol; 2016 Aug; 40(5):307-17. PubMed ID: 27140936 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring and the prevention of perinatal brain injury. Graham EM; Petersen SM; Christo DK; Fox HE Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 108(3 Pt 1):656-66. PubMed ID: 16946228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Role of cardiotocography. Spencer JA Br J Hosp Med; 1992 Jul 1-28; 48(2):115-8. PubMed ID: 1504694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Intermittent Auscultation for Intrapartum Fetal Heart Rate Surveillance (replaces ACNM Clinical Bulletin #9, March 2007). American College of Nurse-Midwives J Midwifery Womens Health; 2010; 55(4):397-403. PubMed ID: 20630370 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Developments in CTG analysis. Van Geijn HP Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 1996 Jun; 10(2):185-209. PubMed ID: 8836480 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Computerized analysis of fetal heart rate variability using the matching pursuit technique as an indicator of fetal hypoxia during labor. Salamalekis E; Hintipas E; Salloum I; Vasios G; Loghis C; Vitoratos N; Chrelias Ch; Creatsas G J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2006 Mar; 19(3):165-9. PubMed ID: 16690510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Fetal distress. Tharmaratnam S Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2000 Feb; 14(1):155-72. PubMed ID: 10789266 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. [Possibilities and value of discontinuous labor monitoring by cardiotocography. A retrospective study based on a continuous cardiotocogram]. Schröck A Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1986 Dec; 46(12):869-72. PubMed ID: 3817408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Understanding fetal physiology and second line monitoring during labor. Garabedian C; De Jonckheere J; Butruille L; Deruelle P; Storme L; Houfflin-Debarge V J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2017 Feb; 46(2):113-117. PubMed ID: 28403965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Fetal distress evaluation using and analyzing the variables of antepartum computerized cardiotocography. Galazios G; Tripsianis G; Tsikouras P; Koutlaki N; Liberis V Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2010 Feb; 281(2):229-33. PubMed ID: 19455348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Cardiotocography as a predictor of fetal outcome in women presenting with reduced fetal movement. Daly N; Brennan D; Foley M; O'Herlihy C Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Nov; 159(1):57-61. PubMed ID: 21899943 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]