These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33038837)

  • 1. Regional competition, environmental decentralization, and target selection of local governments.
    Li G; Guo F; Di D
    Sci Total Environ; 2021 Feb; 755(Pt 1):142536. PubMed ID: 33038837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Environmental decentralization, local government competition, and regional green development: Evidence from China.
    Wu H; Li Y; Hao Y; Ren S; Zhang P
    Sci Total Environ; 2020 Mar; 708():135085. PubMed ID: 31812397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fiscal decentralization, local government environmental protection preference, and regional green innovation efficiency: evidence from China.
    Wang M; Zhang H; Dang D; Guan J; He Y; Chen Y
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Aug; 30(36):85466-85481. PubMed ID: 37386225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Environmental decentralization, environmental protection investment, and green technology innovation.
    Zhang W; Li G
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Feb; 29(9):12740-12755. PubMed ID: 32592052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fiscal Decentralization and Local Environmental Pollution in China.
    Guo S; Wen L; Wu Y; Yue X; Fan G
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Nov; 17(22):. PubMed ID: 33233458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of fiscal decentralization and local government competition on the supply of basic public services: Based on the empirical evidence of prefecture-level cities in China.
    Wang Y; Huang X; Zhang T; Jiang B; Wang X
    Heliyon; 2024 Feb; 10(4):e26511. PubMed ID: 38420436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Local Government Competition, Environmental Regulation Intensity and Regional Innovation Performance: An Empirical Investigation of Chinese Provinces.
    Deng J; Zhang N; Ahmad F; Draz MU
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Jun; 16(12):. PubMed ID: 31208141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of fiscal decentralization on firm environmental performance: evidence from a county-level fiscal reform in China.
    Wen H; Lee CC
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Oct; 27(29):36147-36159. PubMed ID: 32556975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Balancing fiscal expenditure competition and long-term innovation investment: Exploring trade-offs and policy implications for local governments.
    Wenjuan S; Zhao K
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(11):e0293158. PubMed ID: 38032928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Local Government Competition and Regional Green Development in China: The Mediating Role of Environmental Regulation.
    Zhang N; Deng J; Ahmad F; Draz MU
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 May; 17(10):. PubMed ID: 32429455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How does financial decentralization synergies carbon reduction and pollution control in China?
    Mu D; Yang D
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Oct; 30(48):106408-106420. PubMed ID: 37728679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Environmental decentralization and carbon emissions: evidence from China.
    Xu C; Qi Y; Zhu Y; Pang Y
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Dec; 30(59):123193-123213. PubMed ID: 37979115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Can urban land market reform mitigate industrial emissions? Environmental evidence from 257 prefecture-level cities in China.
    Pu W; Zhang A; Zhang Z; Qin S; Xia Q
    Environ Res; 2023 Nov; 236(Pt 1):116707. PubMed ID: 37479211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Decoding the impact of fiscal decentralization on urban pollution intensity in China: A spatial econometric analysis.
    Wang LJ; Lin ZH; Yang PL
    Heliyon; 2024 May; 10(9):e30131. PubMed ID: 38707430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does the local government multi-objective competition intensify the transfer of polluting industries in the Yangtze River Economic Belt?
    Ding X; Liu H; Zhang J; Shen Y; Yang G
    Environ Res; 2024 Mar; 245():118074. PubMed ID: 38160979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Vertical decentralization, environmental regulation, and enterprise pollution: An evolutionary game analysis.
    Wu Y; Hu J; Irfan M; Hu M
    J Environ Manage; 2024 Jan; 349():119449. PubMed ID: 37939469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A study of market segmentation, government competition, and public service efficiency in China: Based on a semi-parametric spatial lag model.
    Yao L; Luo R; Yi X
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(4):e0297446. PubMed ID: 38625884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Can heterogeneous environmental regulations improve industrial green total factor energy efficiency?
    Chu T; Wang S
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Jul; 30(35):84219-84242. PubMed ID: 37365365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Do environmental target constraints of local government affect high-quality economic development? Evidence from China.
    Fu Y; Zhuang H; Zhang X
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Apr; 30(19):56620-56640. PubMed ID: 36920602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Does environmental decentralization exacerbate China's carbon emissions? Evidence based on dynamic threshold effect analysis.
    Ran Q; Zhang J; Hao Y
    Sci Total Environ; 2020 Jun; 721():137656. PubMed ID: 32163741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.