These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33039363)

  • 1. Minimally Invasive vs Conventional Aortic Valve Replacement With Rapid-Deployment Bioprostheses.
    D'Onofrio A; Tessari C; Lorenzoni G; Cibin G; Martinelli G; Alamanni F; Polvani G; Solinas M; Massetti M; Merlo M; Vendramin I; Di Eusanio M; Mignosa C; Mangino D; Russo C; Rinaldi M; Pacini D; Salvador L; Antona C; Maselli D; De Paulis R; Luzi G; Alfieri O; De Filippo CM; Portoghese M; Musumeci F; Colli A; Gregori D; Gerosa G
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2021 Jun; 111(6):1916-1922. PubMed ID: 33039363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Benefits of rapid deployment aortic valve replacement with a mini upper sternotomy.
    Chien S; Clark C; Maheshwari S; Koutsogiannidis CP; Zamvar V; Giordano V; Lim K; Pessotto R
    J Cardiothorac Surg; 2020 Aug; 15(1):226. PubMed ID: 32847577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A randomized multicenter trial of minimally invasive rapid deployment versus conventional full sternotomy aortic valve replacement.
    Borger MA; Moustafine V; Conradi L; Knosalla C; Richter M; Merk DR; Doenst T; Hammerschmidt R; Treede H; Dohmen P; Strauch JT
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2015 Jan; 99(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 25441065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. TRANSFORM (Multicenter Experience With Rapid Deployment Edwards INTUITY Valve System for Aortic Valve Replacement) US clinical trial: Performance of a rapid deployment aortic valve.
    Barnhart GR; Accola KD; Grossi EA; Woo YJ; Mumtaz MA; Sabik JF; Slachman FN; Patel HJ; Borger MA; Garrett HE; Rodriguez E; McCarthy PM; Ryan WH; Duhay FG; Mack MJ; Chitwood WR;
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2017 Feb; 153(2):241-251.e2. PubMed ID: 27817951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Aortic valve replacement through full sternotomy with a stented bioprosthesis versus minimally invasive sternotomy with a sutureless bioprosthesis.
    Dalén M; Biancari F; Rubino AS; Santarpino G; Glaser N; De Praetere H; Kasama K; Juvonen T; Deste W; Pollari F; Meuris B; Fischlein T; Mignosa C; Gatti G; Pappalardo A; Svenarud P; Sartipy U
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2016 Jan; 49(1):220-7. PubMed ID: 25653252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Full sternotomy versus right anterior minithoracotomy for isolated aortic valve replacement in octogenarians: a propensity-matched study †.
    Gilmanov D; Farneti PA; Ferrarini M; Santarelli F; Murzi M; Miceli A; Solinas M; Glauber M
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2015 Jun; 20(6):732-41; discussion 741. PubMed ID: 25757476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sutureless prostheses and less invasive aortic valve replacement: just an issue of clamping time?
    Vola M; Campisi S; Gerbay A; Fuzellier JF; Ayari I; Favre JP; Faure M; Morel J; Anselmi A
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2015 May; 99(5):1518-23. PubMed ID: 25757759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Minimally invasive versus transapical versus transfemoral aortic valve implantation: A one-to-one-to-one propensity score-matched analysis.
    Furukawa N; Kuss O; Emmel E; Scholtz S; Scholtz W; Fujita B; Ensminger S; Gummert JF; Börgermann J
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2018 Nov; 156(5):1825-1834. PubMed ID: 29861110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Surgical aortic valve replacement with new-generation bioprostheses: Sutureless versus rapid-deployment.
    D'Onofrio A; Salizzoni S; Filippini C; Tessari C; Bagozzi L; Messina A; Troise G; Tomba MD; Rambaldini M; Dalén M; Alamanni F; Massetti M; Mignosa C; Russo C; Salvador L; Di Bartolomeo R; Maselli D; De Paulis R; Alfieri O; De Filippo CM; Portoghese M; Bortolotti U; Rinaldi M; Gerosa G
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2020 Feb; 159(2):432-442.e1. PubMed ID: 31213376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Minimally invasive and conventional aortic valve replacement: a propensity score analysis.
    Gilmanov D; Bevilacqua S; Murzi M; Cerillo AG; Gasbarri T; Kallushi E; Miceli A; Glauber M
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2013 Sep; 96(3):837-43. PubMed ID: 23866805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hemodynamic Comparison of Sutureless and Rapid-Deployment Valves with Conventional Bioprostheses.
    Gotzmann M; Wilbring M; Charitos E; Treede H; Silaschi M
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2020 Oct; 68(7):584-594. PubMed ID: 30900219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Minimally invasive access type related to outcomes of sutureless and rapid deployment valves.
    Andreas M; Berretta P; Solinas M; Santarpino G; Kappert U; Fiore A; Glauber M; Misfeld M; Savini C; Mikus E; Villa E; Phan K; Fischlein T; Meuris B; Martinelli G; Teoh K; Mignosa C; Shrestha M; Carrel TP; Yan T; Laufer G; Di Eusanio M
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2020 Nov; 58(5):1063-1071. PubMed ID: 32588056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: Comparison of long-term outcomes.
    Ariyaratnam P; Loubani M; Griffin SC
    Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann; 2015 Sep; 23(7):814-21. PubMed ID: 25991010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sutureless aortic valve implantation through an upper v-type ministernotomy: an innovative approach in high-risk patients.
    Concistrè G; Miceli A; Chiaramonti F; Farneti P; Bevilacqua S; Varone E; Solinas M; Glauber M
    Innovations (Phila); 2013; 8(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 23571790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. One-year outcomes after rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement.
    Young C; Laufer G; Kocher A; Solinas M; Alamanni F; Polvani G; Podesser BK; Aramendi JI; Arribas J; Bouchot O; Livi U; Massetti M; Terp K; Giot C; Glauber M
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2018 Feb; 155(2):575-585. PubMed ID: 29415382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Two alternative sutureless strategies for aortic valve replacement: a two-center experience.
    Concistrè G; Santarpino G; Pfeiffer S; Farneti P; Miceli A; Chiaramonti F; Solinas M; Glauber M; Fischlein T
    Innovations (Phila); 2013; 8(4):253-7. PubMed ID: 24145969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Randomized controlled trial between conventional versus sutureless bioprostheses for aortic valve replacement: Impact of mini and full sternotomy access at 1-year follow-up.
    Fischlein T; Caporali E; Folliguet T; Kappert U; Meuris B; Shrestha ML; Roselli EE; Bonaros N; Fabre O; Corbi P; Troise G; Andreas M; Pinaud F; Pfeiffer S; Kueri S; Tan E; Voisine P; Girdauskas E; Rega F; García-Puente J; Lorusso R
    Int J Cardiol; 2022 Dec; 368():56-61. PubMed ID: 35944771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficacy of Aortic Valve Replacement through Full Sternotomy and Minimal Invasion (Ministernotomy).
    Aliahmed HMA; Karalius R; Valaika A; Grebelis A; Semėnienė P; Čypienė R
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2018 Apr; 54(2):. PubMed ID: 30344257
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mini-aortic surgery with percutaneous cannulation and rapid-deployment valve.
    Bruno P; Farina P; Cammertoni F; Biondi R; Perri G; Di Cesare A; Crea F; Massetti M
    Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann; 2016 Jul; 24(6):535-40. PubMed ID: 27286783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.