413 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33039820)
1. The effect of motor control requirements on drivers' eye-gaze pattern during automated driving.
Goncalves RC; Louw TL; Quaresma M; Madigan R; Merat N
Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Dec; 148():105788. PubMed ID: 33039820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of information from dash-based human-machine interfaces on drivers' gaze patterns and lane-change manoeuvres after conditionally automated driving.
Gonçalves RC; Louw TL; Madigan R; Quaresma M; Romano R; Merat N
Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Sep; 174():106726. PubMed ID: 35716544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of varying levels of vehicle automation on drivers' lane changing behaviour.
Madigan R; Louw T; Merat N
PLoS One; 2018; 13(2):e0192190. PubMed ID: 29466402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Keeping the driver in the loop through semi-automated or manual lane changes in conditionally automated driving.
Dillmann J; den Hartigh RJR; Kurpiers CM; Pelzer J; Raisch FK; Cox RFA; de Waard D
Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Nov; 162():106397. PubMed ID: 34563644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Drivers' gaze patterns when resuming control with a head-up-display: Effects of automation level and time budget.
Xu C; Louw TL; Merat N; Li P; Hu M; Li Y
Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Feb; 180():106905. PubMed ID: 36508949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessing drivers' response during automated driver support system failures with non-driving tasks.
Shen S; Neyens DM
J Safety Res; 2017 Jun; 61():149-155. PubMed ID: 28454860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Were they in the loop during automated driving? Links between visual attention and crash potential.
Louw T; Madigan R; Carsten O; Merat N
Inj Prev; 2017 Aug; 23(4):281-286. PubMed ID: 27655754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Understanding take-over performance of high crash risk drivers during conditionally automated driving.
Lin Q; Li S; Ma X; Lu G
Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Aug; 143():105543. PubMed ID: 32485431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Design and evaluation of cooperative human-machine interface for changing lanes in conditional driving automation.
Muslim H; Kiu Leung C; Itoh M
Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Sep; 174():106719. PubMed ID: 35660872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Towards unpacking older drivers' visual-motor coordination: A gaze-based integrated driving assessment.
Sun QC; Xia JC; He J; Foster J; Falkmer T; Lee H
Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Apr; 113():85-96. PubMed ID: 29407672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Driver Visual Attention Before and After Take-Over Requests During Automated Driving on Public Roads.
Pipkorn L; Dozza M; Tivesten E
Hum Factors; 2024 Feb; 66(2):336-347. PubMed ID: 35708240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Driver behaviors assisted by different human machine interfaces to avoid rear-end collisions during level 2 automated driving.
Yang B; Saito T; Wang Z; Kitazaki S; Nakano K
Traffic Inj Prev; 2023; 24(6):475-481. PubMed ID: 37339499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparing drivers' visual attention at Junctions in Real and Simulated Environments.
Robbins CJ; Allen HA; Chapman P
Appl Ergon; 2019 Oct; 80():89-101. PubMed ID: 31280814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. From partial and high automation to manual driving: Relationship between non-driving related tasks, drowsiness and take-over performance.
Naujoks F; Höfling S; Purucker C; Zeeb K
Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Dec; 121():28-42. PubMed ID: 30205284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effective cues for accelerating young drivers' time to transfer control following a period of conditional automation.
Wright TJ; Agrawal R; Samuel S; Wang Y; Zilberstein S; Fisher DL
Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jul; 116():14-20. PubMed ID: 29031513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantifying drivers' visual perception to analyze accident-prone locations on two-lane mountain highways.
Yu B; Chen Y; Bao S; Xu D
Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Oct; 119():122-130. PubMed ID: 30025353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Anticipatory Driving in Automated Vehicles: The Effects of Driving Experience and Distraction.
He D; DeGuzman CA; Donmez B
Hum Factors; 2023 Jun; 65(4):663. PubMed ID: 34348496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Moving Into the Loop: An Investigation of Drivers' Steering Behavior in Highly Automated Vehicles.
Alsaid A; Lee JD; Price M
Hum Factors; 2020 Jun; 62(4):671-683. PubMed ID: 31180728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. What determines the take-over time? An integrated model approach of driver take-over after automated driving.
Zeeb K; Buchner A; Schrauf M
Accid Anal Prev; 2015 May; 78():212-221. PubMed ID: 25794922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Driver Vigilance Decrement is More Severe During Automated Driving than Manual Driving.
Greenlee ET; DeLucia PR; Newton DC
Hum Factors; 2024 Feb; 66(2):574-588. PubMed ID: 35624552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
