These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

412 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33039820)

  • 21. Keep Your Scanners Peeled: Gaze Behavior as a Measure of Automation Trust During Highly Automated Driving.
    Hergeth S; Lorenz L; Vilimek R; Krems JF
    Hum Factors; 2016 May; 58(3):509-19. PubMed ID: 26843570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. In-vehicle displays to support driver anticipation of traffic conflicts in automated vehicles.
    He D; Kanaan D; Donmez B
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Jan; 149():105842. PubMed ID: 33157393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Driver distraction and its effects on partially automated driving performance: A driving simulator study among young-experienced drivers.
    Zangi N; Srour-Zreik R; Ridel D; Chasidim H; Borowsky A
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Mar; 166():106565. PubMed ID: 35032704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Coming back into the loop: Drivers' perceptual-motor performance in critical events after automated driving.
    Louw T; Markkula G; Boer E; Madigan R; Carsten O; Merat N
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Nov; 108():9-18. PubMed ID: 28837837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Psychophysiological responses to takeover requests in conditionally automated driving.
    Du N; Yang XJ; Zhou F
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Dec; 148():105804. PubMed ID: 33128991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effect of traffic density on drivers' lane change and overtaking maneuvers in freeway situation-A driving simulator-based study.
    Yang L; Li X; Guan W; Zhang HM; Fan L
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018; 19(6):594-600. PubMed ID: 29757689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Behavioral Adaptations to Lane Keeping Systems: Effects of Exposure and Withdrawal.
    Miller EE; Boyle LN
    Hum Factors; 2019 Feb; 61(1):152-164. PubMed ID: 30235014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Autonomous emergency braking systems adapted to snowy road conditions improve drivers' perceived safety and trust.
    Koglbauer I; Holzinger J; Eichberger A; Lex C
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Apr; 19(3):332-337. PubMed ID: 29227692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of cognitive load on drivers' State and task performance during automated driving: Introducing a novel method for determining stabilisation time following take-over of control.
    Melnicuk V; Thompson S; Jennings P; Birrell S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Mar; 151():105967. PubMed ID: 33444868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Steering or braking avoidance response in SHRP2 rear-end crashes and near-crashes: A decision tree approach.
    Sarkar A; Hickman JS; McDonald AD; Huang W; Vogelpohl T; Markkula G
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 May; 154():106055. PubMed ID: 33691227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Consumer demand for partial driving automation and hands-free driving capability.
    Mueller AS; Cicchino JB; Calvanelli JV
    J Safety Res; 2023 Feb; 84():371-383. PubMed ID: 36868666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Take-over performance in evasive manoeuvres.
    Happee R; Gold C; Radlmayr J; Hergeth S; Bengler K
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Sep; 106():211-222. PubMed ID: 28645018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Gaze entropy metrics for mental workload estimation are heterogenous during hands-off level 2 automation.
    Goodridge CM; Gonçalves RC; Arabian A; Horrobin A; Solernou A; Lee YT; Lee YM; Madigan R; Merat N
    Accid Anal Prev; 2024 Jul; 202():107560. PubMed ID: 38677239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Asleep at the automated wheel-Sleepiness and fatigue during highly automated driving.
    Vogelpohl T; Kühn M; Hummel T; Vollrath M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 May; 126():70-84. PubMed ID: 29571975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effects of assignments of dedicated automated vehicle lanes and inter-vehicle distances of automated vehicle platoons on car-following performance of nearby manual vehicle drivers.
    Chen F; Lu G; Tan H; Liu M; Wan H
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Nov; 177():106826. PubMed ID: 36081223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Assessing Drivers' Trust of Automated Vehicle Driving Styles With a Two-Part Mixed Model of Intervention Tendency and Magnitude.
    Lee JD; Liu SY; Domeyer J; DinparastDjadid A
    Hum Factors; 2021 Mar; 63(2):197-209. PubMed ID: 31596618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Repeated conditionally automated driving on the road: How do drivers leave the loop over time?
    Dillmann J; Den Hartigh RJR; Kurpiers CM; Raisch FK; Kadrileev N; Cox RFA; De Waard D
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Mar; 181():106927. PubMed ID: 36584619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Estimating the out-of-the-loop phenomenon from visual strategies during highly automated driving.
    Schnebelen D; Charron C; Mars F
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Dec; 148():105776. PubMed ID: 33039817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Control task substitution in semiautomated driving: does it matter what aspects are automated?
    Carsten O; Lai FC; Barnard Y; Jamson AH; Merat N
    Hum Factors; 2012 Oct; 54(5):747-61. PubMed ID: 23156620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Performance of an Additional Task During Level 2 Automated Driving: An On-Road Study Comparing Drivers With and Without Experience With Partial Automation.
    Solís-Marcos I; Ahlström C; Kircher K
    Hum Factors; 2018 Sep; 60(6):778-792. PubMed ID: 29791201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.