These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33040331)

  • 1. False individual patient data and zombie randomised controlled trials submitted to Anaesthesia.
    Carlisle JB
    Anaesthesia; 2021 Apr; 76(4):472-479. PubMed ID: 33040331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hundreds of thousands of zombie randomised trials circulate among us.
    Ioannidis JPA
    Anaesthesia; 2021 Apr; 76(4):444-447. PubMed ID: 33124075
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Data fabrication and other reasons for non-random sampling in 5087 randomised, controlled trials in anaesthetic and general medical journals.
    Carlisle JB
    Anaesthesia; 2017 Aug; 72(8):944-952. PubMed ID: 28580651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An analysis of retractions of papers authored by Scott Reuben, Joachim Boldt and Yoshitaka Fujii.
    McHugh UM; Yentis SM
    Anaesthesia; 2019 Jan; 74(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 30144024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Presence of 'spin' in the abstracts and titles of anaesthesiology randomised controlled trials.
    Kinder NC; Weaver MD; Wayant C; Vassar M
    Br J Anaesth; 2019 Jan; 122(1):e13-e14. PubMed ID: 30579417
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How frequently do allegations of scientific misconduct occur in ecology and evolution, and what happens afterwards?
    Moreno-Rueda G
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2013 Mar; 19(1):93-6. PubMed ID: 21706356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An Appraisal of the Carlisle-Stouffer-Fisher Method for Assessing Study Data Integrity and Fraud.
    Mascha EJ; Vetter TR; Pittet JF
    Anesth Analg; 2017 Oct; 125(4):1381-1385. PubMed ID: 28786843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Adherence to guidance on registration of randomised controlled trials published in Anaesthesia.
    El-Boghdadly K; Wiles MD; Atton S; Bailey CR
    Anaesthesia; 2018 May; 73(5):556-563. PubMed ID: 29292498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Are randomized trials conducted in China or India biased? A comparative empirical analysis.
    Zhang D; Freemantle N; Cheng KK
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Jan; 64(1):90-5. PubMed ID: 20554429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improving the quality of papers submitted to dental journals: Transcription of session for editors, associate editors, publishers and others with an interest in scientific publishing held at IADR meeting in Cape Town on Wednesday, 25 June 2014.
    Eaton KA; Giannobile WV; Sourgen DL; Balaji SM; Honkala E; Lynch CD
    J Dent; 2015 Aug; 43(8):855-64. PubMed ID: 25748020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Endorsement of the CONSORT guidelines, trial registration, and the quality of reporting randomised controlled trials in leading nursing journals: A cross-sectional analysis.
    Jull A; Aye PS
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2015 Jun; 52(6):1071-9. PubMed ID: 25540865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Testing Hypotheses on Risk Factors for Scientific Misconduct via Matched-Control Analysis of Papers Containing Problematic Image Duplications.
    Fanelli D; Costas R; Fang FC; Casadevall A; Bik EM
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2019 Jun; 25(3):771-789. PubMed ID: 29460082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ghost authorship in industry-initiated randomised trials.
    Gøtzsche PC; Hróbjartsson A; Johansen HK; Haahr MT; Altman DG; Chan AW
    PLoS Med; 2007 Jan; 4(1):e19. PubMed ID: 17227134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Risk of bias and problematic trials: characterising the research integrity of trials submitted to Anaesthesia.
    Bramley P; Hulman J; Wanstall H
    Anaesthesia; 2024 Aug; ():. PubMed ID: 39145890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Are most randomised trials in anaesthesia and critical care wrong? An analysis using Bayes' theorem.
    Sidebotham D
    Anaesthesia; 2020 Oct; 75(10):1386-1393. PubMed ID: 32255517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. What Crisis? Management Researchers' Experiences with and Views of Scholarly Misconduct.
    Hopp C; Hoover GA
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2019 Oct; 25(5):1549-1588. PubMed ID: 30604353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Zombie intuitions.
    Fischer E; Sytsma J
    Cognition; 2021 Oct; 215():104807. PubMed ID: 34153926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evidence for compromised data integrity in studies of liberal peri-operative inspired oxygen.
    Myles PS; Carlisle JB; Scarr B
    Anaesthesia; 2019 May; 74(5):573-584. PubMed ID: 30772931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improving biomedical journals' ethical policies: the case of research misconduct.
    Bosch X
    J Med Ethics; 2014 Sep; 40(9):644-6. PubMed ID: 24505117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.