BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

371 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33041226)

  • 1. Association of Consensus Molecular Subtypes and Molecular Markers With Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Biomarker Analyses From LUME-Colon 1.
    Lenz HJ; Argiles G; Yoshino T; Tejpar S; Ciardiello F; Braunger J; Salnikov AV; Gabrielyan O; Schmid R; Höfler J; Kitzing T; Van Cutsem E
    Clin Colorectal Cancer; 2021 Mar; 20(1):84-95.e8. PubMed ID: 33041226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Consensus molecular subgroups (CMS) of colorectal cancer (CRC) and first-line efficacy of FOLFIRI plus cetuximab or bevacizumab in the FIRE3 (AIO KRK-0306) trial.
    Stintzing S; Wirapati P; Lenz HJ; Neureiter D; Fischer von Weikersthal L; Decker T; Kiani A; Kaiser F; Al-Batran S; Heintges T; Lerchenmüller C; Kahl C; Seipelt G; Kullmann F; Moehler M; Scheithauer W; Held S; Modest DP; Jung A; Kirchner T; Aderka D; Tejpar S; Heinemann V
    Ann Oncol; 2019 Nov; 30(11):1796-1803. PubMed ID: 31868905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. CMS-dependent prognostic impact of KRAS and BRAFV600E mutations in primary colorectal cancer.
    Smeby J; Sveen A; Merok MA; Danielsen SA; Eilertsen IA; Guren MG; Dienstmann R; Nesbakken A; Lothe RA
    Ann Oncol; 2018 May; 29(5):1227-1234. PubMed ID: 29518181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Analysis of circulating DNA and protein biomarkers to predict the clinical activity of regorafenib and assess prognosis in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a retrospective, exploratory analysis of the CORRECT trial.
    Tabernero J; Lenz HJ; Siena S; Sobrero A; Falcone A; Ychou M; Humblet Y; Bouché O; Mineur L; Barone C; Adenis A; Yoshino T; Goldberg RM; Sargent DJ; Wagner A; Laurent D; Teufel M; Jeffers M; Grothey A; Van Cutsem E
    Lancet Oncol; 2015 Aug; 16(8):937-48. PubMed ID: 26184520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The prognostic impact of consensus molecular subtypes (CMS) and its predictive effects for bevacizumab benefit in metastatic colorectal cancer: molecular analysis of the AGITG MAX clinical trial.
    Mooi JK; Wirapati P; Asher R; Lee CK; Savas P; Price TJ; Townsend A; Hardingham J; Buchanan D; Williams D; Tejpar S; Mariadason JM; Tebbutt NC
    Ann Oncol; 2018 Nov; 29(11):2240-2246. PubMed ID: 30247524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relative contribution of clinicopathological variables, genomic markers, transcriptomic subtyping and microenvironment features for outcome prediction in stage II/III colorectal cancer.
    Dienstmann R; Villacampa G; Sveen A; Mason MJ; Niedzwiecki D; Nesbakken A; Moreno V; Warren RS; Lothe RA; Guinney J
    Ann Oncol; 2019 Oct; 30(10):1622-1629. PubMed ID: 31504112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Evolving Role of Consensus Molecular Subtypes: a Step Beyond Inpatient Selection for Treatment of Colorectal Cancer.
    Ros J; Baraibar I; Martini G; Salvà F; Saoudi N; Cuadra-Urteaga JL; Dienstmann R; Tabernero J; Élez E
    Curr Treat Options Oncol; 2021 Nov; 22(12):113. PubMed ID: 34741675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Nintedanib for the treatment of patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (LUME-Colon 1): a phase III, international, randomized, placebo-controlled study.
    Van Cutsem E; Yoshino T; Lenz HJ; Lonardi S; Falcone A; Limón ML; Saunders M; Sobrero A; Park YS; Ferreiro R; Hong YS; Tomasek J; Taniguchi H; Ciardiello F; Stoehr J; Oum'Hamed Z; Vlassak S; Studeny M; Argiles G
    Ann Oncol; 2018 Sep; 29(9):1955-1963. PubMed ID: 30010751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Characterization of patients with sporadic colorectal cancer following the new Consensus Molecular Subtypes (CMS)].
    Wielandt AM; Villarroel C; Hurtado C; Simian D; Zamorano D; Martínez M; Castro M; Vial MT; Kronberg U; López-Kostner F
    Rev Med Chil; 2017 Apr; 145(4):419-430. PubMed ID: 28748988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Consensus molecular subtype classification of colorectal adenomas.
    Komor MA; Bosch LJ; Bounova G; Bolijn AS; Delis-van Diemen PM; Rausch C; Hoogstrate Y; Stubbs AP; de Jong M; Jenster G; van Grieken NC; Carvalho B; Wessels LF; Jimenez CR; Fijneman RJ; Meijer GA;
    J Pathol; 2018 Nov; 246(3):266-276. PubMed ID: 29968252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical Value of Consensus Molecular Subtypes in Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Ten Hoorn S; de Back TR; Sommeijer DW; Vermeulen L
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2022 Apr; 114(4):503-516. PubMed ID: 34077519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Molecular pathological classification of colorectal cancer.
    Müller MF; Ibrahim AE; Arends MJ
    Virchows Arch; 2016 Aug; 469(2):125-34. PubMed ID: 27325016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prognostic Implications of Mucinous Differentiation in Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma Can Be Explained by Distinct Molecular and Clinicopathologic Characteristics.
    Khan M; Loree JM; Advani SM; Ning J; Li W; Pereira AAL; Lam M; Raghav K; Morris VK; Broaddus R; Maru D; Overman MJ; Kopetz S
    Clin Colorectal Cancer; 2018 Dec; 17(4):e699-e709. PubMed ID: 30205948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Role of circulating free DNA in evaluating clinical tumor burden and predicting survival in Chinese metastatic colorectal cancer patients.
    Xu X; Yu Y; Shen M; Liu M; Wu S; Liang L; Huang F; Zhang C; Guo W; Liu T
    BMC Cancer; 2020 Oct; 20(1):1006. PubMed ID: 33066758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Association Between Baseline Circulating Tumor Cells, Molecular Tumor Profiling, and Clinical Characteristics in a Large Cohort of Chemo-naïve Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients Prospectively Collected.
    Sastre J; Orden V; Martínez A; Bando I; Balbín M; Bellosillo B; Palanca S; Peligros Gomez MI; Mediero B; Llovet P; Moral VM; Viéitez JM; García-Alfonso P; Calle SG; Ortiz-Morales MJ; Salud A; Quintero G; Lopez C; Díaz-Rubio E; Aranda E;
    Clin Colorectal Cancer; 2020 Sep; 19(3):e110-e116. PubMed ID: 32278676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Immunohistochemistry-Based Consensus Molecular Subtypes as a Prognostic and Predictive Biomarker for Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Stage II Colorectal Cancer.
    Li Y; Yao Q; Zhang L; Mo S; Cai S; Huang D; Peng J
    Oncologist; 2020 Dec; 25(12):e1968-e1979. PubMed ID: 32926498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Phenotypic subtypes predict outcomes in colorectal cancer.
    Kasurinen J; Beilmann-Lehtonen I; Kaprio T; Hagström J; Haglund C; Böckelman C
    Acta Oncol; 2023 Mar; 62(3):245-252. PubMed ID: 36867078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Classifying Colorectal Cancer by Tumor Location Rather than Sidedness Highlights a Continuum in Mutation Profiles and Consensus Molecular Subtypes.
    Loree JM; Pereira AAL; Lam M; Willauer AN; Raghav K; Dasari A; Morris VK; Advani S; Menter DG; Eng C; Shaw K; Broaddus R; Routbort MJ; Liu Y; Morris JS; Luthra R; Meric-Bernstam F; Overman MJ; Maru D; Kopetz S
    Clin Cancer Res; 2018 Mar; 24(5):1062-1072. PubMed ID: 29180604
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Rationale and Design for the LUME-Colon 1 Study: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase III Trial of Nintedanib Plus Best Supportive Care Versus Placebo Plus Best Supportive Care in Patients With Advanced Colorectal Cancer Refractory to Standard Treatment.
    Van Cutsem E; Yoshino T; Hocke J; Oum'Hamed Z; Studeny M; Tabernero J
    Clin Colorectal Cancer; 2016 Mar; 15(1):91-94.e1. PubMed ID: 26603056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Microenvironment, systemic inflammatory response and tumor markers considering consensus molecular subtypes of colorectal cancer.
    Jakab A; Patai ÁV; Darvas M; Tormássi-Bély K; Micsik T
    Pathol Oncol Res; 2024; 30():1611574. PubMed ID: 38645565
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.