134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33043338)
1. [Comparison of the stress distribution of microtitanium and bioresorbable plates in fixation of mandibulotomy].
Han J; Xie DP; Wang HS; Zhou ZJ; Liu JN
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2020 Jun; 29(3):237-241. PubMed ID: 33043338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Three-dimensional finite element analysis of mandibular bilateral sagitta1 split ramus osteotomy with rigid internal fixation].
Yin HW; Lin N; Guan J; Zhang GL
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2012 Apr; 21(2):194-8. PubMed ID: 22610332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A customized fixation plate with novel structure designed by topological optimization for mandibular angle fracture based on finite element analysis.
Liu YF; Fan YY; Jiang XF; Baur DA
Biomed Eng Online; 2017 Nov; 16(1):131. PubMed ID: 29141673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Computerized analysis of resorbable polymer plates and screws for the rigid fixation of mandibular angle fractures.
Cox T; Kohn MW; Impelluso T
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Apr; 61(4):481-7; discussion 487-8. PubMed ID: 12684967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Minimally invasive bioabsorbable bone plates for rigid internal fixation of mandible fractures.
Gaball C; Lovald S; Baack B; Olson G
Arch Facial Plast Surg; 2011; 13(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 21242429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A computer study of fracture mobility and strain on biodegradable plates used for fixation of mandibular fractures.
Tams J; Otten B; van Loon JP; Bos RR
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1999 Aug; 57(8):973-81; discussion 981-2. PubMed ID: 10437725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mechanical design optimization of bioabsorbable fixation devices for bone fractures.
Lovald ST; Khraishi T; Wagner J; Baack B
J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Mar; 20(2):389-98. PubMed ID: 19242363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Computed Tomography-Based 3-Dimensional Finite Element Analyses of Various Types of Plates Placed for a Virtually Reduced Unilateral Condylar Fracture of the Mandible of a Patient.
Murakami K; Yamamoto K; Sugiura T; Horita S; Matsusue Y; Kirita T
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Jun; 75(6):1239.e1-1239.e11. PubMed ID: 28325640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Finite element analysis of 3D-printed personalized titanium plates for mandibular angle fracture.
Li Y; Li H; Lai Q; Xue R; Zhu K; Deng Y
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2023 Jan; 26(1):78-89. PubMed ID: 35587215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of stability of titanium and absorbable plate and screw fixation for mandibular angle fractures.
Esen A; Ataoğlu H; Gemi L
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Dec; 106(6):806-11. PubMed ID: 18718777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanical evaluation of two internal fixation systems for the treatment of mandibular symphyseal fracture.
Wongwaithongdee U; Inglam S; Chantarapanich N
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2023 May; 237(5):597-606. PubMed ID: 37070457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Stability of bioresorbable plates following reduction of mandibular body fracture: Three-dimensional analysis.
Song IS; Choi J; Kim SR; Lee JH
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2019 Nov; 47(11):1752-1757. PubMed ID: 31445877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the biomechanical behavior between commercial and 3D-printed patient-specific Ti6Al4V L-Shaped titanium plates following le fort i osteotomy using finite element analysis: A technical Note.
Telha W; Chen H; Al-Watary MQ; Sakran K; Wang Q; Zhu S; Jiang N
Med Eng Phys; 2024 Jul; 129():104176. PubMed ID: 38906569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of the Biomechanical Performance of 5 Plating Techniques in Fixation of Mandibular Subcondylar Fracture Using Finite Element Analysis.
Darwich MA; Albogha MH; Abdelmajeed A; Darwich K
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Apr; 74(4):794.e1-8. PubMed ID: 26706490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Biomechanical analysis on healing process of sagittal fracture of the mandibular condyle after rigid fixation].
Jing J; Qu AL; Ding XM; Hei YN
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2015 Apr; 24(2):164-9. PubMed ID: 25938144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of the rigidity of sagittal split ramus osteotomy fixation using four designs of biodegradable and titanium plates--a numerical study.
Albougha S; Albogha MH; Darwich MA; Darwich K
Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Sep; 19(3):281-5. PubMed ID: 25784154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Strength analysis of titanium and resorbable internal fixation in a mandibulotomy model.
Ricalde P; Engroff SL; Von Fraunhofer JA; Posnick JC
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Aug; 63(8):1180-3. PubMed ID: 16094588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Feasibility of carbon-fiber-reinforced polymer fixation plates for treatment of atrophic mandibular fracture: A finite element method.
Nurettin D; Burak B
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2018 Dec; 46(12):2182-2189. PubMed ID: 30340836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of Neck Screw and Conventional Fixation Techniques in Mandibular Condyle Fractures Using 3-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
Conci RA; Tomazi FH; Noritomi PY; da Silva JV; Fritscher GG; Heitz C
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Jul; 73(7):1321-7. PubMed ID: 25869984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A computer study of biodegradable plates for internal fixation of mandibular angle fractures.
Tams J; Van Loon JP; Otten B; Bos RR
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Apr; 59(4):404-7; discussion 407-8. PubMed ID: 11289171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
