These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33043471)

  • 21. Are forested buffers an effective conservation strategy for riparian fauna? An assessment using meta-analysis.
    Marczak LB; Sakamaki T; Turvey SL; Deguise I; Wood SL; Richardson JS
    Ecol Appl; 2010 Jan; 20(1):126-34. PubMed ID: 20349835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Identifying riparian buffer effects on stream nitrogen in southeastern coastal plain watersheds.
    Christensen JR; Nash MS; Neale A
    Environ Manage; 2013 Nov; 52(5):1161-76. PubMed ID: 23989318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Legal ecotones: A comparative analysis of riparian policy protection in the Oregon Coast Range, USA.
    Boisjolie BA; Santelmann MV; Flitcroft RL; Duncan SL
    J Environ Manage; 2017 Jul; 197():206-220. PubMed ID: 28388459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Towards ecologically functional riparian zones: A meta-analysis to develop guidelines for protecting ecosystem functions and biodiversity in agricultural landscapes.
    Lind L; Hasselquist EM; Laudon H
    J Environ Manage; 2019 Nov; 249():109391. PubMed ID: 31445372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Sediment retention in rangeland riparian buffers.
    Hook PB
    J Environ Qual; 2003; 32(3):1130-7. PubMed ID: 12809315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Methane flux in cropland and adjacent riparian buffers with different vegetation covers.
    Kim DG; Isenhart TM; Parkin TB; Schultz RC; Loynachan TE
    J Environ Qual; 2010; 39(1):97-105. PubMed ID: 20048297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Phosphorus reductions following riparian restoration in two agricultural watersheds in Vermont, USA.
    Meals DW; Hopkins RB
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(9):51-60. PubMed ID: 12079124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Riparian buffer zones as pesticide filters of no-till crops.
    Aguiar TR; Bortolozo FR; Hansel FA; Rasera K; Ferreira MT
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2015 Jul; 22(14):10618-26. PubMed ID: 25744820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Watershed land use effects on lake water quality in Denmark.
    Nielsen A; Trolle D; Søndergaard M; Lauridsen TL; Bjerring R; Olesen JE; Jeppesen E
    Ecol Appl; 2012 Jun; 22(4):1187-200. PubMed ID: 22827127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Lake Nutrient Responses to Integrated Conservation Practices in an Agricultural Watershed.
    Lizotte RE; Yasarer LM; Locke MA; Bingner RL; Knight SS
    J Environ Qual; 2017 Mar; 46(2):330-338. PubMed ID: 28380566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Impacts of different vegetation in riparian buffer strips on runoff and sediment loss.
    Dunn RM; Hawkins JMB; Blackwell MSA; Zhang Y; Collins AL
    Hydrol Process; 2022 Nov; 36(11):e14733. PubMed ID: 36636488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Agroforestry practices, runoff, and nutrient loss: a paired watershed comparison.
    Udawatta RP; Krstansky JJ; Henderson GS; Garrett HE
    J Environ Qual; 2002; 31(4):1214-25. PubMed ID: 12175039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A review of vegetated buffers and a meta-analysis of their mitigation efficacy in reducing nonpoint source pollution.
    Zhang X; Liu X; Zhang M; Dahlgren RA; Eitzel M
    J Environ Qual; 2010; 39(1):76-84. PubMed ID: 20048295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Multiple stressors in agricultural streams: a mesocosm study of interactions among raised water temperature, sediment addition and nutrient enrichment.
    Piggott JJ; Lange K; Townsend CR; Matthaei CD
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(11):e49873. PubMed ID: 23185471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Impacts of rotational grazing and riparian buffers on physicochemical and biological characteristicsof southeastern Minnesota, USA, streams.
    Sovell LA; Vondracek B; Frost JA; Mumford KG
    Environ Manage; 2000 Dec; 26(6):629-41. PubMed ID: 11029114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Hydrogeological constraints on riparian buffers for reduction of diffuse pollution: examples from the Bear Creek watershed in Iowa, USA.
    Simpkins WW; Wineland TR; Andress RJ; Johnston DA; Caron GC; Isenhart TM; Schultz RC
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(9):61-8. PubMed ID: 12079125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Landscape planning for agricultural nonpoint source pollution reduction III: assessing phosphorus and sediment reduction potential.
    Diebel MW; Maxted JT; Robertson DM; Han S; Vander Zanden MJ
    Environ Manage; 2009 Jan; 43(1):69-83. PubMed ID: 18521658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Sensitivity of Riparian Buffer Designs to Climate Change-Nutrient and Sediment Loading to Streams: A Case Study in the Albemarle-Pamlico River Basins (USA) Using HAWQS.
    Ghimire SR; Corona J; Parmar R; Mahadwar G; Srinivasan R; Mendoza K; Johnston JM
    Sustainability; 2021 Nov; 13(22):1-28. PubMed ID: 35059223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A secondary assessment of sediment trapping effectiveness by vegetated buffers.
    Ramesh R; Kalin L; Hantush M; Chaudhary A
    Ecol Eng; 2021 Jan; 159():1-13. PubMed ID: 34975230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Ecosystem services from partially harvested riparian buffers can offset biomass production costs.
    Jager HI; Nair SS; Efroymson RA; DeRolph CR; Parish ES; Wang G
    Sci Total Environ; 2023 Sep; 889():164199. PubMed ID: 37207772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.