These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33044357)

  • 1. Statistics Commentary Series. Commentary No. 43: Patient Preference Trials.
    Streiner DL
    J Clin Psychopharmacol; 2020; 40(6):529-530. PubMed ID: 33044357
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Statistics Commentary Series. Commentary No. 44: Internal and External Validity.
    Streiner DL
    J Clin Psychopharmacol; 2020; 40(6):531-533. PubMed ID: 33044353
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Statistics Commentary Series. Commentary No. 41: Randomization.
    Streiner DL
    J Clin Psychopharmacol; 2020; 40(5):439-440. PubMed ID: 32773494
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Statistics Commentary Series. Commentary No. 42: Minimization.
    Streiner DL
    J Clin Psychopharmacol; 2020; 40(5):441-442. PubMed ID: 32701908
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Importance of proper conduct of clinical trials.
    Cortegiani A; Absalom AR
    Br J Anaesth; 2021 Feb; 126(2):354-356. PubMed ID: 33121749
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Guided by the research design: choosing the right statistical test.
    Beath A; Jones MP
    Med J Aust; 2018 Mar; 208(4):163-165. PubMed ID: 29490219
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Describing the participants in a study.
    Pickering RM
    Age Ageing; 2017 Jul; 46(4):576-581. PubMed ID: 28472376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Optimal allocation of participants for the estimation of selection, preference and treatment effects in the two-stage randomised trial design.
    Walter SD; Turner RM; Macaskill P; McCaffery KJ; Irwig L
    Stat Med; 2012 Jun; 31(13):1307-22. PubMed ID: 22362374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimating the causal effect of randomization versus treatment preference in a doubly randomized preference trial.
    Marcus SM; Stuart EA; Wang P; Shadish WR; Steiner PM
    Psychol Methods; 2012 Jun; 17(2):244-54. PubMed ID: 22563844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Re: The design versus the analysis of observational studies for causal effects: parallels with the design of randomized trials.
    Shrier I
    Stat Med; 2008 Jun; 27(14):2740-1; author reply 2741-2. PubMed ID: 18069729
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Lies, damn lies, and statistics.
    Yentis SM
    Anaesthesia; 2012 May; 67(5):455-456. PubMed ID: 22404377
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Covariate adjustment for randomized controlled trials revisited.
    Wang J
    Pharm Stat; 2020 May; 19(3):255-261. PubMed ID: 31863636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. ALS issues in clinical trials. Missing data.
    Thompson JL; Levy G
    Amyotroph Lateral Scler Other Motor Neuron Disord; 2004 Sep; 5 Suppl 1():48-51. PubMed ID: 15512872
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On statistical methods to test if sampling in trials is genuinely random.
    Pandit JJ
    Anaesthesia; 2012 May; 67(5):456-462. PubMed ID: 22404285
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The analysis of 168 randomised controlled trials to test data integrity.
    Fujii Y
    Anaesthesia; 2012 Jun; 67(6):669-70; author reply 670. PubMed ID: 22512837
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Statistical principles: myths or facts?
    Sylvester R
    Onkologie; 2003 Dec; 26(6):520-1. PubMed ID: 14709923
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Statistical trial designs and clinical practice: are they compatible?
    Punt CJ
    Onkologie; 2003 Dec; 26(6):518-9. PubMed ID: 14709922
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Editorial: Randomised controlled trials of factorial design alias on how to speed up research on effectiveness of interventions without compromising its validity.
    Esposito M; Nieri M
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2016; 9(1):3-4. PubMed ID: 27022633
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multi-period crossover trials.
    Matthews JN
    Stat Methods Med Res; 1994 Dec; 3(4):383-405. PubMed ID: 7889228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Analysis of data integrity.
    McCann JC; Hudes ML; Ames BN
    Anaesthesia; 2012 Sep; 67(9):1042-3. PubMed ID: 22861504
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.