BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33044403)

  • 1. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake on PET/computed tomography in association with androgen receptor expression and other clinicopathologic factors in surgically resected triple-negative breast cancer.
    Lee HJ; Lim HS; Ki SY; Park HM; Lee JE; Jeong WG; Shin SS; Kwon SY; Park MH; Lee JS
    Nucl Med Commun; 2021 Jan; 42(1):101-106. PubMed ID: 33044403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Correlation between (18)F-FDG uptake on PET/CT and prognostic factors in triple-negative breast cancer.
    Koo HR; Park JS; Kang KW; Han W; Park IA; Moon WK
    Eur Radiol; 2015 Nov; 25(11):3314-21. PubMed ID: 25903708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. 18F-FDG uptake in breast cancer correlates with immunohistochemically defined subtypes.
    Koo HR; Park JS; Kang KW; Cho N; Chang JM; Bae MS; Kim WH; Lee SH; Kim MY; Kim JY; Seo M; Moon WK
    Eur Radiol; 2014 Mar; 24(3):610-8. PubMed ID: 24097303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Role of FDG-PET/CT in evaluating surgical outcomes of operable breast cancer--usefulness for malignant grade of triple-negative breast cancer.
    Ohara M; Shigematsu H; Tsutani Y; Emi A; Masumoto N; Ozaki S; Kadoya T; Okada M
    Breast; 2013 Oct; 22(5):958-63. PubMed ID: 23756383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The maximum standardized uptake value of metastatic site in 18 F-FDG PET/CT predicts molecular subtypes and survival in metastatic breast cancer: An Izmir Oncology Group study.
    Cokmert S; Tanriverdi O; Karapolat I; Demir L; Bayoglu V; Can A; Akyol M; Yilmaz Y; Oktay Tarhan M
    J BUON; 2016; 21(6):1410-1418. PubMed ID: 28039701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The correlation of
    Qu YH; Long N; Ran C; Sun J
    Clin Transl Oncol; 2021 Mar; 23(3):620-627. PubMed ID: 32683540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Noninvasive
    Henry KE; Dilling TR; Abdel-Atti D; Edwards KJ; Evans MJ; Lewis JS
    J Nucl Med; 2018 Jan; 59(1):51-57. PubMed ID: 28848040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Association between MRI Features and Standardized Uptake Value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.
    Choi BB; Lee JS; Kim KH
    Oncol Res Treat; 2018; 41(11):706-711. PubMed ID: 30321870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of triple-negative and estrogen receptor-positive/progesterone receptor-positive/HER2-negative breast carcinoma using quantitative fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose/positron emission tomography imaging parameters: a potentially useful method for disease characterization.
    Basu S; Chen W; Tchou J; Mavi A; Cermik T; Czerniecki B; Schnall M; Alavi A
    Cancer; 2008 Mar; 112(5):995-1000. PubMed ID: 18098228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Relationship between tumor heterogeneity measured on FDG-PET/CT and pathological prognostic factors in invasive breast cancer.
    Soussan M; Orlhac F; Boubaya M; Zelek L; Ziol M; Eder V; Buvat I
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(4):e94017. PubMed ID: 24722644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11.
    Kimura Y; Sasada S; Emi A; Masumoto N; Kadoya T; Arihiro K; Okada M
    Anticancer Res; 2023 Jan; 43(1):127-136. PubMed ID: 36585209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Association of androgen receptor expression with glucose metabolic features in triple-negative breast cancer.
    Lee R; Lee HB; Paeng JC; Choi H; Whi W; Han W; Seok JW; Kang KW; Cheon GJ
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(9):e0275279. PubMed ID: 36178912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Complete Metabolic Response on Interim
    Chen S; Ibrahim NK; Yan Y; Wong ST; Wang H; Wong FC
    Oncologist; 2017 May; 22(5):526-534. PubMed ID: 28377466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ductal carcinoma in situ and ductal carcinoma in situ with microinvasion: correlation of FDG uptake with histological and biological prognostic factors.
    Seo YY; Yoo IR; Park SY; Oh JK; Kim SH; Sohn HS
    Breast Cancer; 2017 May; 24(3):353-361. PubMed ID: 27312540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Stratifying triple-negative breast cancer prognosis using 18F-FDG-PET/CT imaging.
    Yue Y; Cui X; Bose S; Audeh W; Zhang X; Fraass B
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2015 Oct; 153(3):607-16. PubMed ID: 26346756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Association between partial-volume corrected SUVmax and Oncotype DX recurrence score in early-stage, ER-positive/HER2-negative invasive breast cancer.
    Lee SH; Ha S; An HJ; Lee JS; Han W; Im SA; Ryu HS; Kim WH; Chang JM; Cho N; Moon WK; Cheon GJ
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2016 Aug; 43(9):1574-84. PubMed ID: 27209424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The roles of 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT and 18 F-FDG PET/CT imaging in patients with triple-negative breast cancer and the association of tissue PSMA and claudin 1, 4, and 7 levels with PET findings.
    Arslan E; Ergül N; Beyhan E; Erol Fenercioglu Ö; Sahin R; Cin M; Battal Havare S; Can Trabulus FD; Mermut Ö; Akbas S; Fikret Çermik T
    Nucl Med Commun; 2023 Apr; 44(4):284-290. PubMed ID: 36756767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Correlation between semiquantitative and volumetric 18F-FDG PET/computed tomography parameters and Ki-67 expression in breast cancer.
    Mohamadien NRA; Sayed MHM
    Nucl Med Commun; 2021 Jun; 42(6):656-664. PubMed ID: 33560720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Strong association of epidermal growth factor receptor status with breast cancer FDG uptake.
    Lee J; Lee EJ; Moon SH; Kim S; Hyun SH; Cho YS; Choi JY; Kim BT; Lee KH
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2017 Aug; 44(9):1438-1447. PubMed ID: 28488029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Diffusion-weighted imaging and (18) F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in breast cancer: Correlation of the apparent diffusion coefficient and maximum standardized uptake values with prognostic factors.
    Karan B; Pourbagher A; Torun N
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Jun; 43(6):1434-44. PubMed ID: 26663655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.