These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33044786)

  • 21. Using strategic foresight to assess conservation opportunity.
    Cook CN; Wintle BC; Aldrich SC; Wintle BA
    Conserv Biol; 2014 Dec; 28(6):1474-83. PubMed ID: 25381735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Fine- and coarse-filter conservation strategies in a time of climate change.
    Tingley MW; Darling ES; Wilcove DS
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2014 Aug; 1322():92-109. PubMed ID: 25040506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A typology of time-scale mismatches and behavioral interventions to diagnose and solve conservation problems.
    Wilson RS; Hardisty DJ; Epanchin-Niell RS; Runge MC; Cottingham KL; Urban DL; Maguire LA; Hastings A; Mumby PJ; Peters DP
    Conserv Biol; 2016 Feb; 30(1):42-9. PubMed ID: 26390368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Knowledge co-production and boundary work to promote implementation of conservation plans.
    Nel JL; Roux DJ; Driver A; Hill L; Maherry AC; Snaddon K; Petersen CR; Smith-Adao LB; Van Deventer H; Reyers B
    Conserv Biol; 2016 Feb; 30(1):176-88. PubMed ID: 26041340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Integration of ecological-biological thresholds in conservation decision making.
    Mavrommati G; Bithas K; Borsuk ME; Howarth RB
    Conserv Biol; 2016 Dec; 30(6):1173-1181. PubMed ID: 27112955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Structuring decisions for managing threatened and endangered species in a changing climate.
    Gregory R; Arvai J; Gerber LR
    Conserv Biol; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1212-21. PubMed ID: 24299087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Understanding conflicting cultural models of outdoor cats to overcome conservation impasse.
    Leong KM; Gramza AR; Lepczyk CA
    Conserv Biol; 2020 Oct; 34(5):1190-1199. PubMed ID: 32374059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Planning for ex situ conservation in the face of uncertainty.
    Canessa S; Converse SJ; West M; Clemann N; Gillespie G; McFadden M; Silla AJ; Parris KM; McCarthy MA
    Conserv Biol; 2016 Jun; 30(3):599-609. PubMed ID: 26306549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Understanding the effects of different social data on selecting priority conservation areas.
    Karimi A; Tulloch AIT; Brown G; Hockings M
    Conserv Biol; 2017 Dec; 31(6):1439-1449. PubMed ID: 28425128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Setting conservation priorities for migratory networks under uncertainty.
    Dhanjal-Adams KL; Klaassen M; Nicol S; Possingham HP; Chadès I; Fuller RA
    Conserv Biol; 2017 Jun; 31(3):646-656. PubMed ID: 27641210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. From science to action: Principles for undertaking environmental research that enables knowledge exchange and evidence-based decision-making.
    Cvitanovic C; McDonald J; Hobday AJ
    J Environ Manage; 2016 Dec; 183(Pt 3):864-874. PubMed ID: 27665124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Incorporating geodiversity into conservation decisions.
    Comer PJ; Pressey RL; Hunter ML; Schloss CA; Buttrick SC; Heller NE; Tirpak JM; Faith DP; Cross MS; Shaffer ML
    Conserv Biol; 2015 Jun; 29(3):692-701. PubMed ID: 25923052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Environmental cost of using poor decision metrics to prioritize environmental projects.
    Pannell DJ; Gibson FL
    Conserv Biol; 2016 Apr; 30(2):382-91. PubMed ID: 26365219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Lessons from other disciplines for setting management thresholds for biodiversity conservation.
    Hilton M; Walsh JC; Liddell E; Cook CN
    Conserv Biol; 2022 Feb; 36(1):e13865. PubMed ID: 34811813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Choosing and using climate-change scenarios for ecological-impact assessments and conservation decisions.
    Snover AK; Mantua NJ; Littell JS; Alexander MA; McClure MM; Nye J
    Conserv Biol; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1147-57. PubMed ID: 24299081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A typology of barriers and enablers of scientific evidence use in conservation practice.
    Walsh JC; Dicks LV; Raymond CM; Sutherland WJ
    J Environ Manage; 2019 Nov; 250():109481. PubMed ID: 31518795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Structured decision making as a conceptual framework to identify thresholds for conservation and management.
    Martin J; Runge MC; Nichols JD; Lubow BC; Kendall WL
    Ecol Appl; 2009 Jul; 19(5):1079-90. PubMed ID: 19688917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Untapped potential of collective intelligence in conservation and environmental decision making.
    Vercammen A; Burgman M
    Conserv Biol; 2019 Dec; 33(6):1247-1255. PubMed ID: 31006918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Using a social-ecological framework to inform the implementation of conservation plans.
    Guerrero AM; Wilson KA
    Conserv Biol; 2017 Apr; 31(2):290-301. PubMed ID: 27601156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Fostering collective action through participation in natural resource and environmental management: An integrative and interpretative narrative review using the IAD, NAS and SES frameworks.
    Ortiz-Riomalo JF; Koessler AK; Engel S
    J Environ Manage; 2023 Apr; 331():117184. PubMed ID: 36738636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.