These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. When the neonate is defective. Contemp Ob Gyn; 1976 Jun; 7(6):90-92+. PubMed ID: 11663000 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Questionable basis for 'hopeless and unbearable suffering' as the criterion for the active termination of life in newborns with spina bifida]. Kompanje EJ; de Jong TH; Arts WF; Rotteveel JJ Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2005 Sep; 149(37):2067-9. PubMed ID: 16184950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Meningomyelocele: to treat or not to treat. Cooperman EM Can Med Assoc J; 1977 Jun; 116(12):1339-40. PubMed ID: 324594 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Parents refuse to allow life-saving treatment for newborn: our moral obligation. Otten M Princet J Bioeth; 1998; 1(1):61-4. PubMed ID: 11657340 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The anguish of decision-on the birth of a severely handicapped infant. Reich WT; Smith H Hastings Cent Rep; 1973 Sep; 3(4):10-2. PubMed ID: 4607566 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Selective treatment of myelomeningocele: To treat or not to treat? Lorber J Pediatrics; 1974 Mar; 53(3):307-8. PubMed ID: 4592677 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Euthanasia, the right to die and privacy: observations on some recent cases. Riga PJ Linc Law Rev; 1980; 11(2):109-65. PubMed ID: 11658630 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The Elin Daniels case: an examination of the legal, medical, and ethical considerations posed when parents and doctors disagree on whether to treat a defective newborn. Portela C Forum; 1983; 18(4):709-27. PubMed ID: 11658577 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The severely defective newborn: the dilemma and the decision process. Heymann PB; Holtz S Public Policy; 1975; 23(4):381-417. PubMed ID: 800266 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Questionable basis for 'hopeless and unbearable suffering' as the criterion for the active termination of life in newborns with spina bifida]. Verhagen AA; Sol JJ; brouwer OF; Sauer PJ Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2005 Sep; 149(38):2136; author reply 2136. PubMed ID: 16201605 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Suit filed in Oklahoma alleging twenty-four infants died after being denied beneficial medical treatment. Paulus SM Issues Law Med; 1986 Jan; 1(4):321-30. PubMed ID: 11651816 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Dehumanization triumphant. Kass LR First Things; 1996; 65():15-6. PubMed ID: 11654487 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Two precipices, one chasm: the economics of physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia. Lund N Hastings Constit Law Q; 1997; 24(4):903-46. PubMed ID: 11657287 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Infant care review committees: their moral responsibilities. Barry RL Linacre Q; 1985 Nov; 52(4):361-74. PubMed ID: 11651843 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Active euthanasia in newborn infants with spina bifida?]. Molenaar JC Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1996 Apr; 140(14):801-2. PubMed ID: 8668272 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. On letting some babies die. Smith DH Stud Hastings Cent; 1974 May; 2(2):37-46. PubMed ID: 11661065 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Euthanasia in the Netherlands: sliding down the slippery slope? Keown J Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy; 1995; 9(2):407-48. PubMed ID: 11653001 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]