These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 330462)
1. The court and a conflict of principles. Callahan S Hastings Cent Rep; 1977 Aug; 7(4):7-8. PubMed ID: 330462 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The Supreme Court on abortion funding: the second time around. Horan DJ; Marzen TJ St Louis Univ Law J; 1981; 25(2):411-27. PubMed ID: 11655812 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Constitutional law--United States Supreme Court upholds the constitutionality of the Hyde Amendment...--Harris v. McRae, 100 S.Ct. 2671 (1980). Barnett BA Temple Law Q; 1981; 54(1):109-44. PubMed ID: 11655628 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The abortion-funding issue: a study in mixed constitutional cues. Yarbrough TE North Carol Law Rev; 1981 Mar; 59(3):611-27. PubMed ID: 11655747 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Indigent women--what right to abortion? Friedman BW NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1978; 23(4):709-41. PubMed ID: 11662584 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Abortion and the Supreme Court: some are more equal than others. Segers MC Hastings Cent Rep; 1977 Aug; 7(4):5-6. PubMed ID: 330461 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Harris v. McRae: the Court retreats from Roe v. Wade. Brock VM Loyola Law Rev; 1980; 26(3):749-60. PubMed ID: 11664179 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Constitutional law--abortion funding and the demise of the maternal health consideration--Harris v. McRae, 100 S.Ct. 2671 (1980). Libby FA Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1981 Apr; 15(2):285-305. PubMed ID: 11655650 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Let them eat cake. Annas GJ Hastings Cent Rep; 1977 Aug; 7(4):8-9. PubMed ID: 330463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Privacy, abortion, and judicial review: haunted by the ghost of Lochner. Garfield H Wash Law Rev; 1986 Apr; 61(2):293-365. PubMed ID: 11652501 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The Hyde Amendment: an infringement upon the free exercise clause? Biskin JC Rutgers Law Rev; 1981; 33(4):1054-75. PubMed ID: 11655472 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The right to Medicaid payment for abortion. Butler PA Hastings Law J; 1977 Mar; 28(4):931-77. PubMed ID: 11663756 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The abortion funding conundrum: inalienable rights, affirmative duties, and the dilemma of dependence. Tribe LH Harv Law Rev; 1985 Nov; 99(1):330-43. PubMed ID: 11655827 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Public funding of medically necessary abortions is not required under the Medicaid Act: Harris v. McRae, 100 S.Ct. 2671 (1980). Gray AD Tex Tech Law Rev; 1981; 12(2):483-99. PubMed ID: 11655635 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Committee to Defend Reproductive Rights v. Myers: Medi-Cal funding of abortion. Hendrickson E Gold Gate Univ Law Rev; 1978; 9(2):361-419. PubMed ID: 11664072 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Constitutional law--denial of state Medicaid funds for abortions not 'medically necessary' does not violate the equal protection clause. Barber CK Howard Law J; 1978; 21(3):937-54. PubMed ID: 11663935 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Will there be a constitutional right to abortion after the reconsideration of Roe v. Wade? Bopp J J Contemp Law; 1989; 15(2):131-73. PubMed ID: 11655991 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]