143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33047117)
1. Selective Interference and the Evolution of Sex.
Otto SP
J Hered; 2021 Mar; 112(1):9-18. PubMed ID: 33047117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Interference among deleterious mutations favours sex and recombination in finite populations.
Keightley PD; Otto SP
Nature; 2006 Sep; 443(7107):89-92. PubMed ID: 16957730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Temporal variation in selection accelerates mutational decay by Muller's ratchet.
Wardlaw AM; Agrawal AF
Genetics; 2012 Jul; 191(3):907-16. PubMed ID: 22542966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An Evolving Genetic Architecture Interacts with Hill-Robertson Interference to Determine the Benefit of Sex.
Whitlock AO; Peck KM; Azevedo RB; Burch CL
Genetics; 2016 Jun; 203(2):923-36. PubMed ID: 27098911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Hill-Robertson interference maintained by Red Queen dynamics favours the evolution of sex.
da Silva J; Galbraith JD
J Evol Biol; 2017 May; 30(5):994-1010. PubMed ID: 28295769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Selection for recombination in structured populations.
Martin G; Otto SP; Lenormand T
Genetics; 2006 Jan; 172(1):593-609. PubMed ID: 15944358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effects of deleterious mutations on evolution at linked sites.
Charlesworth B
Genetics; 2012 Jan; 190(1):5-22. PubMed ID: 22219506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effects of Hill-Robertson interference between weakly selected mutations on patterns of molecular evolution and variation.
McVean GA; Charlesworth B
Genetics; 2000 Jun; 155(2):929-44. PubMed ID: 10835411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The role of advantageous mutations in enhancing the evolution of a recombination modifier.
Hartfield M; Otto SP; Keightley PD
Genetics; 2010 Apr; 184(4):1153-64. PubMed ID: 20139345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Consequences of recombination for the evolution of the mating type locus in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii.
Hasan AR; Duggal JK; Ness RW
New Phytol; 2019 Nov; 224(3):1339-1348. PubMed ID: 31222749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Causes and consequences of linkage disequilibrium among transposable elements within eukaryotic genomes.
Roze D
Genetics; 2023 May; 224(2):. PubMed ID: 37019818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Most cancers carry a substantial deleterious load due to Hill-Robertson interference.
Tilk S; Tkachenko S; Curtis C; Petrov DA; McFarland CD
Elife; 2022 Sep; 11():. PubMed ID: 36047771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sex and deleterious mutations.
Gordo I; Campos PR
Genetics; 2008 May; 179(1):621-6. PubMed ID: 18493076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Muller's ratchet and the degeneration of Y chromosomes: a simulation study.
Engelstädter J
Genetics; 2008 Oct; 180(2):957-67. PubMed ID: 18780738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. On the speed of Muller's ratchet.
Gordo I; Charlesworth B
Genetics; 2000 Dec; 156(4):2137-40. PubMed ID: 11187462
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Fitness of RNA virus decreased by Muller's ratchet.
Chao L
Nature; 1990 Nov; 348(6300):454-5. PubMed ID: 2247152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. QUANTITATIVE VARIATION IN FINITE PARTHENOGENETIC POPULATIONS: WHAT STOPS MULLER'S RATCHET IN THE ABSENCE OF RECOMBINATION?
Wagner GP; Gabriel W
Evolution; 1990 May; 44(3):715-731. PubMed ID: 28567981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effects of recombination rate on the distribution and abundance of transposable elements.
Dolgin ES; Charlesworth B
Genetics; 2008 Apr; 178(4):2169-77. PubMed ID: 18430942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Why sex and recombination?
Barton NH
Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol; 2009; 74():187-95. PubMed ID: 19903748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mutational meltdown in primary endosymbionts: selection limits Muller's ratchet.
Allen JM; Light JE; Perotti MA; Braig HR; Reed DL
PLoS One; 2009; 4(3):e4969. PubMed ID: 19305500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
