211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33047203)
1. Effect of restorative timing on shear bond strength of composite resin/calcium silicate-based cements adhesive interfaces.
Palma PJ; Marques JA; Antunes M; Falacho RI; Sequeira D; Roseiro L; Santos JM; Ramos JC
Clin Oral Investig; 2021 May; 25(5):3131-3139. PubMed ID: 33047203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Microshear Bond Strength of Tri-Calcium Silicate-based Cements to Different Restorative Materials.
Cengiz E; Ulusoy N
J Adhes Dent; 2016; 18(3):231-7. PubMed ID: 27045140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Delayed vs. immediate placement of restorative materials over Biodentine and RetroMTA: a micro-shear bond strength study.
Celiksoz O; Irmak O
BMC Oral Health; 2024 Jan; 24(1):130. PubMed ID: 38273289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Shear bond strength of calcium silicate-based cements to glass ionomers.
Ergül R; Aksu S; Çalışkan S; Tüloğlu N
BMC Oral Health; 2024 Jan; 24(1):140. PubMed ID: 38281948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of shear bond strength of calcium-enriched mixture cement and mineral trioxide aggregate to composite resin.
Oskoee SS; Kimyai S; Bahari M; Motahari P; Eghbal MJ; Asgary S
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2011 Nov; 12(6):457-62. PubMed ID: 22269237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Does Delayed Restoration Improve Shear Bond Strength of Different Restorative Protocols to Calcium Silicate-Based Cements?
Palma PJ; Marques JA; Falacho RI; Vinagre A; Santos JM; Ramos JC
Materials (Basel); 2018 Nov; 11(11):. PubMed ID: 30413054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Shear bond strength of calcium silicate-based cements to composite resin using a universal adhesive in different application modes: an in vitro study.
Naiboğlu P; Koşar T; Yücel AÇ
Aust Dent J; 2024 Jun; 69(2):102-111. PubMed ID: 37875350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The physical characteristics of resin composite-calcium silicate interface as part of a layered/laminate adhesive restoration.
Hashem DF; Foxton R; Manoharan A; Watson TF; Banerjee A
Dent Mater; 2014 Mar; 30(3):343-9. PubMed ID: 24418628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bond strength of Biodentine to a resin-based composite at various acid etching times and with different adhesive strategies.
Krawczyk-Stuss M; Nowak J; Bołtacz-Rzepkowska E
Dent Med Probl; 2019; 56(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 30835973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In vitro comparison of shear bond strength of a flowable composite resin and a single-component glass-ionomer to three different pulp-capping agents.
Zarean P; Roozbeh R; Zarean P; Jahromi MZ; Broujeni PM
Dent Med Probl; 2019; 56(3):239-244. PubMed ID: 31577067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of shear bond strength of two resin-based composites and glass ionomer cement to pure tricalcium silicate-based cement (Biodentine®).
Cantekin K; Avci S
J Appl Oral Sci; 2014; 22(4):302-6. PubMed ID: 25141202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Shear bond strength of Biodentine, ProRoot MTA, glass ionomer cement and composite resin on human dentine ex vivo.
Kaup M; Dammann CH; Schäfer E; Dammaschke T
Head Face Med; 2015 Apr; 11():14. PubMed ID: 25908430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength and microleakage of tricalcium silicate-based restorative material and radioopaque posterior glass ionomer restorative cement in primary and permanent teeth: an in vitro study.
Raju VG; Venumbaka NR; Mungara J; Vijayakumar P; Rajendran S; Elangovan A
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2014; 32(4):304-10. PubMed ID: 25231038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of mineral trioxide aggregate surface treatments on morphology and bond strength to composite resin.
Shin JH; Jang JH; Park SH; Kim E
J Endod; 2014 Aug; 40(8):1210-6. PubMed ID: 25069935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Influence of setting time on bond strength of different bioactive pulp capping materials with dental adhesive].
Dong YT; Tian FC; Jia B; Zu B; Wang XY
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2018 Feb; 50(1):58-62. PubMed ID: 29483723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bonding over Dentin Replacement Materials.
Meraji N; Camilleri J
J Endod; 2017 Aug; 43(8):1343-1349. PubMed ID: 28662878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The micro-shear bond strength of new endodontic tricalcium silicate-based putty: An in vitro study.
Özata MY; Falakaloğlu S; Plotino G; Adıgüzel Ö
Aust Endod J; 2023 Apr; 49(1):124-129. PubMed ID: 35665571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Microleakage and shear punch bond strength in class II primary molars cavities restored with low shrink silorane based versus methacrylate based composite using three different techniques.
Fahmy AE; Farrag NM
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2010; 35(2):173-81. PubMed ID: 21417120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Shear bond strength of a novel light cured calcium silicate based-cement to resin composite using different adhesive systems.
Alzraikat H; Taha NA; Qasrawi D; Burrow MF
Dent Mater J; 2016 Dec; 35(6):881-887. PubMed ID: 27680033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In vitro shear bond strength of cementing agents to fixed prosthodontic restorative materials.
Piwowarczyk A; Lauer HC; Sorensen JA
J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Sep; 92(3):265-73. PubMed ID: 15343162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
