108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33047970)
1. Comparison of dynamic response of three TLIF techniques on the fused and adjacent segments under vibration.
Wang QD; Guo LX
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2021 Feb; 24(3):308-319. PubMed ID: 33047970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of effects of four interbody fusion approaches on the fused and adjacent segments under vibration.
Guo LX; Wang QD
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2020 Jun; 76():105023. PubMed ID: 32417603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Finite Element Analysis of the Vibration Characteristics of Fused Lumbar Spine.
Fan W; Guo LX; Zhao D
World Neurosurg; 2021 Jun; 150():e81-e88. PubMed ID: 33647495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical analysis of segmental lumbar lordosis and risk of cage subsidence with different cage heights and alternative placements in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
Rastegar S; Arnoux PJ; Wang X; Aubin CÉ
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2020 Jul; 23(9):456-466. PubMed ID: 32169009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical comparison of the effects of anterior, posterior and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion on vibration characteristics of the human lumbar spine.
Fan W; Guo LX
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2019 Apr; 22(5):490-498. PubMed ID: 30714396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bilateral pedicle screw fixation provides superior biomechanical stability in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a finite element study.
Ambati DV; Wright EK; Lehman RA; Kang DG; Wagner SC; Dmitriev AE
Spine J; 2015 Aug; 15(8):1812-22. PubMed ID: 24983669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical comparison of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with 1 or 2 cages by finite-element analysis.
Xu H; Ju W; Xu N; Zhang X; Zhu X; Zhu L; Qian X; Wen F; Wu W; Jiang F
Neurosurgery; 2013 Dec; 73(2 Suppl Operative):ons198-205; discussion ons205. PubMed ID: 23632763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanical role of cement augmentation in the vibration characteristics of the osteoporotic lumbar spine after lumbar interbody fusion.
Wang QD; Guo LX
J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2022 Jun; 33(6):52. PubMed ID: 35657438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: the effect of various instrumentation techniques on the flexibility of the lumbar spine.
Harris BM; Hilibrand AS; Savas PE; Pellegrino A; Vaccaro AR; Siegler S; Albert TJ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Feb; 29(4):E65-70. PubMed ID: 15094547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Do expandable cage size and number of cages matter in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion at L5-S1? A comparative biomechanical analysis using finite element modeling.
Bakhaidar M; Harinathan B; Banurekha Devaraj K; Yoganandan N; Shabani S
J Neurosurg Spine; 2024 May; ():1-7. PubMed ID: 38788233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanical role of osteoporosis in the vibration characteristics of human spine after lumbar interbody fusion.
Wang QD; Guo LX
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2020 Dec; 36(12):e3402. PubMed ID: 33021071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Lordosis Recreation in Transforaminal and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Cadaveric Study of the Influence of Surgical Bone Resection and Cage Angle.
Robertson PA; Armstrong WA; Woods DL; Rawlinson JJ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2018 Nov; 43(22):E1350-E1357. PubMed ID: 30383726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of the influence of three different lumbar interbody fusion approaches on stress in the pedicle screw fixation system: Finite element static and vibration analyses.
Fan W; Guo LX
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2019 Mar; 35(3):e3162. PubMed ID: 30294902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Role of Posterior Screw Fixation in Single-Level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion During Whole Body Vibration: A Finite Element Study.
Fan W; Guo LX
World Neurosurg; 2018 Jun; 114():e1086-e1093. PubMed ID: 29605701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Stress analysis of the implants in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion under static and vibration loadings: a comparison between pedicle screw fixation system with rigid and flexible rods.
Fan W; Guo LX; Zhao D
J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2019 Oct; 30(10):118. PubMed ID: 31628540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biomechanical Evaluation of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion on the Adjacent Segment: A Finite Element Analysis.
Wang B; Hua W; Ke W; Lu S; Li X; Zeng X; Yang C
World Neurosurg; 2019 Jun; 126():e819-e824. PubMed ID: 30862579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of lordosis on adjacent levels after lumbar interbody fusion, before and after removal of the spinal fixator: a finite element analysis.
Tsuang FY; Tsai JC; Lai DM
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 Oct; 20(1):470. PubMed ID: 31651312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prediction of complications and fusion outcomes of fused lumbar spine with or without fixation system under whole-body vibration.
Wang QD; Guo LX
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2021 Jun; 59(6):1223-1233. PubMed ID: 34080095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of Lumbar Lordosis on the Adjacent Segment in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Finite Element Analysis.
Zhao X; Du L; Xie Y; Zhao J
World Neurosurg; 2018 Jun; 114():e114-e120. PubMed ID: 29477002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical analysis of various footprints of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion devices.
Faizan A; Kiapour A; Kiapour AM; Goel VK
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2014 Jun; 27(4):E118-27. PubMed ID: 24869985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
