630 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33048032)
1. Multicenter Evaluation of Breast Cancer Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in Combination with Synthetic versus Digital Mammography.
Zuckerman SP; Sprague BL; Weaver DL; Herschorn SD; Conant EF
Radiology; 2020 Dec; 297(3):545-553. PubMed ID: 33048032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Five Consecutive Years of Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Outcomes by Screening Year and Round.
Conant EF; Zuckerman SP; McDonald ES; Weinstein SP; Korhonen KE; Birnbaum JA; Tobey JD; Schnall MD; Hubbard RA
Radiology; 2020 May; 295(2):285-293. PubMed ID: 32154771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparing Screening Outcomes for Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Digital Mammography by Automated Breast Density in a Randomized Controlled Trial: Results from the To-Be Trial.
Moshina N; Aase HS; Danielsen AS; Haldorsen IS; Lee CI; Zackrisson S; Hofvind S
Radiology; 2020 Dec; 297(3):522-531. PubMed ID: 32930649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Digital Mammography versus Digital Mammography Plus Tomosynthesis in Breast Cancer Screening: The Oslo Tomosynthesis Screening Trial.
Skaane P; Bandos AI; Niklason LT; Sebuødegård S; Østerås BH; Gullien R; Gur D; Hofvind S
Radiology; 2019 Apr; 291(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 30777808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Synthetic 2D Mammography versus Digital Mammography: Evaluation in a Population-based Screening Program.
Hofvind S; Hovda T; Holen ÅS; Lee CI; Albertsen J; Bjørndal H; Brandal SHB; Gullien R; Lømo J; Park D; Romundstad L; Suhrke P; Vigeland E; Skaane P
Radiology; 2018 Jun; 287(3):787-794. PubMed ID: 29494322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mammographic Screening in Routine Practice: Multisite Study of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Digital Mammography Screenings.
Conant EF; Talley MM; Parghi CR; Sheh BC; Liang SY; Pohlman S; Rane A; Jung Y; Stevens LAS; Paulus JK; Alsheik N
Radiology; 2023 May; 307(3):e221571. PubMed ID: 36916891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Association of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis vs Digital Mammography With Cancer Detection and Recall Rates by Age and Breast Density.
Conant EF; Barlow WE; Herschorn SD; Weaver DL; Beaber EF; Tosteson ANA; Haas JS; Lowry KP; Stout NK; Trentham-Dietz A; diFlorio-Alexander RM; Li CI; Schnall MD; Onega T; Sprague BL;
JAMA Oncol; 2019 May; 5(5):635-642. PubMed ID: 30816931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Is there any added value to substitute the 2D digital MLO projection for a MLO tomosynthesis projection and its synthetic view when a 2D standard digital mammography is used in a one-stop-shop immediate reading mammography screening?
Mesurolle B; El Khoury M; Travade A; Bagard C; Pétrou A; Monghal C
Eur Radiol; 2021 Dec; 31(12):9529-9539. PubMed ID: 34047846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effectiveness of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Compared With Digital Mammography: Outcomes Analysis From 3 Years of Breast Cancer Screening.
McDonald ES; Oustimov A; Weinstein SP; Synnestvedt MB; Schnall M; Conant EF
JAMA Oncol; 2016 Jun; 2(6):737-43. PubMed ID: 26893205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Digital 2D versus Tomosynthesis Screening Mammography among Women Aged 65 and Older in the United States.
Bahl M; Pinnamaneni N; Mercaldo S; McCarthy AM; Lehman CD
Radiology; 2019 Jun; 291(3):582-590. PubMed ID: 30938625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of performance metrics with digital 2D versus tomosynthesis mammography in the diagnostic setting.
Bahl M; Mercaldo S; Vijapura CA; McCarthy AM; Lehman CD
Eur Radiol; 2019 Feb; 29(2):477-484. PubMed ID: 29967957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Breast Density and Breast Cancer Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: A TOSYMA Trial Subanalysis.
Weigel S; Heindel W; Hense HW; Decker T; Gerß J; Kerschke L;
Radiology; 2023 Feb; 306(2):e221006. PubMed ID: 36194110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Screening Performance of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis vs Digital Mammography in Community Practice by Patient Age, Screening Round, and Breast Density.
Lowry KP; Coley RY; Miglioretti DL; Kerlikowske K; Henderson LM; Onega T; Sprague BL; Lee JM; Herschorn S; Tosteson ANA; Rauscher G; Lee CI
JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Jul; 3(7):e2011792. PubMed ID: 32721031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Breast cancer screening using tomosynthesis in combination with digital mammography compared to digital mammography alone: a cohort study within the PROSPR consortium.
Conant EF; Beaber EF; Sprague BL; Herschorn SD; Weaver DL; Onega T; Tosteson AN; McCarthy AM; Poplack SP; Haas JS; Armstrong K; Schnall MD; Barlow WE
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2016 Feb; 156(1):109-16. PubMed ID: 26931450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Digital Mammography versus Breast Tomosynthesis: Impact of Breast Density on Diagnostic Performance in Population-based Screening.
Østerås BH; Martinsen ACT; Gullien R; Skaane P
Radiology; 2019 Oct; 293(1):60-68. PubMed ID: 31407968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis versus Digital Mammography for Detection of Early-Stage Cancers Stratified by Grade: A TOSYMA Subanalysis.
Weigel S; Heindel W; Decker T; Weyer-Elberich V; Kerschke L; Gerß J; Hense HW;
Radiology; 2023 Dec; 309(3):e231533. PubMed ID: 38051184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Addition of Screening Breast US to Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Screening in Women at Average Risk.
Yi A; Jang MJ; Yim D; Kwon BR; Shin SU; Chang JM
Radiology; 2021 Mar; 298(3):568-575. PubMed ID: 33434108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Breast Cancer Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Are Initial Benefits Sustained?
Bahl M; Mercaldo S; Dang PA; McCarthy AM; Lowry KP; Lehman CD
Radiology; 2020 Jun; 295(3):529-539. PubMed ID: 32255414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. False-Negative Rates of Breast Cancer Screening with and without Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
Durand MA; Friedewald SM; Plecha DM; Copit DS; Barke LD; Rose SL; Hayes MK; Greer LN; Dabbous FM; Conant EF
Radiology; 2021 Feb; 298(2):296-305. PubMed ID: 33258744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
