230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33048258)
1. No detrimental effect of a positive family history on postoperative upgrading and upstaging in men with low risk and favourable intermediate-risk prostate cancer: implications for active surveillance.
Herkommer K; Maier N; Ankerst DP; Schiele S; Gschwend JE; Meissner VH
World J Urol; 2021 Jul; 39(7):2499-2506. PubMed ID: 33048258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pathologic Outcomes of Gleason 6 Favorable Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer Treated With Radical Prostatectomy: Implications for Active Surveillance.
Yang DD; Mahal BA; Muralidhar V; Vastola ME; Boldbaatar N; Labe SA; Nezolosky MD; Orio PF; King MT; Martin NE; Mouw KW; Trinh QD; Nguyen PL
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2018 Jun; 16(3):226-234. PubMed ID: 29196209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Risk of Upgrading and Upstaging Among 10 000 Patients with Gleason 3+4 Favorable Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer.
Yang DD; Mahal BA; Muralidhar V; Nezolosky MD; Vastola ME; Labe SA; Boldbaatar N; King MT; Martin NE; Orio PF; Beard CJ; Hoffman KE; Trinh QD; Spratt DE; Feng FY; Nguyen PL
Eur Urol Focus; 2019 Jan; 5(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 28753811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Low serum total testosterone level as a predictor of upstaging and upgrading in low-risk prostate cancer patients meeting the inclusion criteria for active surveillance.
Ferro M; Lucarelli G; Bruzzese D; Di Lorenzo G; Perdonà S; Autorino R; Cantiello F; La Rocca R; Busetto GM; Cimmino A; Buonerba C; Battaglia M; Damiano R; De Cobelli O; Mirone V; Terracciano D
Oncotarget; 2017 Mar; 8(11):18424-18434. PubMed ID: 27793023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The impact of race/ethnicity on upstaging and/or upgrading rates among intermediate risk prostate cancer patients treated with radical prostatectomy.
Nocera L; Wenzel M; Collà Ruvolo C; Würnschimmel C; Tian Z; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Chun FKH; Mirone V; Graefen M; Saad F; Shariat SF; Montorsi F; Briganti A; Karakiewicz PI
World J Urol; 2022 Jan; 40(1):103-110. PubMed ID: 34436637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Adverse upgrading and/or upstaging in contemporary low-risk prostate cancer patients.
Flammia RS; Hoeh B; Hohenhorst L; Sorce G; Chierigo F; Panunzio A; Tian Z; Saad F; Leonardo C; Briganti A; Antonelli A; Terrone C; Shariat SF; Anceschi U; Graefen M; Chun FKH; Montorsi F; Gallucci M; Karakiewicz PI
Int Urol Nephrol; 2022 Oct; 54(10):2521-2528. PubMed ID: 35838831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cribriform morphology predicts upstaging after radical prostatectomy in patients with Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer at transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided needle biopsy.
Keefe DT; Schieda N; El Hallani S; Breau RH; Morash C; Robertson SJ; Mai KT; Belanger EC; Flood TA
Virchows Arch; 2015 Oct; 467(4):437-42. PubMed ID: 26229020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Outcomes of men with an elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level as their sole preoperative intermediate- or high-risk feature.
Faisal FA; Sundi D; Pierorazio PM; Ball MW; Humphreys EB; Han M; Epstein JI; Partin AW; Carter HB; Bivalacqua TJ; Schaeffer EM; Ross AE
BJU Int; 2014 Dec; 114(6b):E120-E129. PubMed ID: 24731026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Heterogeneity in D'Amico classification-based low-risk prostate cancer: Differences in upgrading and upstaging according to active surveillance eligibility.
Schiffmann J; Wenzel P; Salomon G; Budäus L; Schlomm T; Minner S; Wittmer C; Kraft S; Krech T; Steurer S; Sauter G; Beyer B; Boehm K; Tilki D; Michl U; Huland H; Graefen M; Karakiewicz PI
Urol Oncol; 2015 Jul; 33(7):329.e13-9. PubMed ID: 25960411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Adverse Disease Features in Gleason Score 3 + 4 "Favorable Intermediate-Risk" Prostate Cancer: Implications for Active Surveillance.
Morlacco A; Cheville JC; Rangel LJ; Gearman DJ; Karnes RJ
Eur Urol; 2017 Sep; 72(3):442-447. PubMed ID: 27574819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Utility of Gleason pattern 4 morphologies detected on transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsies for prediction of upgrading or upstaging in Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer.
Flood TA; Schieda N; Keefe DT; Breau RH; Morash C; Hogan K; Belanger EC; Mai KT; Robertson SJ
Virchows Arch; 2016 Sep; 469(3):313-9. PubMed ID: 27394432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Role of Chronic Inflammation as a Predictor of Upstaging/Upgrading in Prostate Cancer: Finding a New Group Eligible for Active Surveillance.
Nowroozi MR; Ayati M; Amini E; Aghamiri SM; Momeni SA; Ohadian Moghadam S; Valizadeh F
Urol J; 2020 Jun; 17(4):370-373. PubMed ID: 31953833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of pathological upstaging or upgrading on metastasis and cancer-specific mortality in men with clinical low-risk prostate cancer.
Kovac E; Vertosick EA; Sjoberg DD; Vickers AJ; Stephenson AJ
BJU Int; 2018 Dec; 122(6):1003-1009. PubMed ID: 29802773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Low serum testosterone predicts upgrading and upstaging of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.
Gao Y; Jiang CY; Mao SK; Cui D; Hao KY; Zhao W; Jiang Q; Ruan Y; Xia SJ; Han BM
Asian J Androl; 2016; 18(4):639-43. PubMed ID: 26732103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Incidence of upgrading and upstaging in patients with low-volume Gleason score 3+4 prostate cancers at biopsy: finding a new group eligible for active surveillance.
Park HJ; Ha YS; Park SY; Kim YT; Lee TY; Kim JH; Lee DH; Kim WJ; Kim IY
Urol Int; 2013; 90(3):301-5. PubMed ID: 23391718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Racial variation in prostate cancer upgrading and upstaging among men with low-risk clinical characteristics.
Jalloh M; Myers F; Cowan JE; Carroll PR; Cooperberg MR
Eur Urol; 2015 Mar; 67(3):451-7. PubMed ID: 24746973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Histologic upgrading in patients eligible for active surveillance on saturation biopsy.
Chung PH; Darwish OM; Roehrborn CG; Kapur P; Lotan Y
Can J Urol; 2015 Feb; 22(1):7656-60. PubMed ID: 25694015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Population based study of predictors of adverse pathology among candidates for active surveillance with Gleason 6 prostate cancer.
Vellekoop A; Loeb S; Folkvaljon Y; Stattin P
J Urol; 2014 Feb; 191(2):350-7. PubMed ID: 24071481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Non-organ confined stage and upgrading rates in exclusive PSA high-risk prostate cancer patients.
Hoeh B; Flammia RS; Hohenhorst L; Sorce G; Chierigo F; Tian Z; Saad F; Gallucci M; Briganti A; Terrone C; Shariat SF; Graefen M; Tilki D; Kluth LA; Mandel P; Becker A; Chun FKH; Karakiewicz PI
Prostate; 2022 May; 82(6):687-694. PubMed ID: 35188982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The pathological upgrading after radical prostatectomy in low-risk prostate cancer patients who are eligible for active surveillance: How safe is it to depend on bioptic pathology?
Verep S; Erdem S; Ozluk Y; Kilicaslan I; Sanli O; Ozcan F
Prostate; 2019 Sep; 79(13):1523-1529. PubMed ID: 31269285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
