These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33048567)
1. Modulations of saliency signals at two hierarchical levels of priority computation revealed by spatial statistical distractor learning. Liesefeld HR; Müller HJ J Exp Psychol Gen; 2021 Apr; 150(4):710-728. PubMed ID: 33048567 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Probability cueing of singleton-distractor locations in visual search: Priority-map- versus dimension-based inhibition? Zhang B; Allenmark F; Liesefeld HR; Shi Z; Müller HJ J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Sep; 45(9):1146-1163. PubMed ID: 31144860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Learning to suppress salient distractors in the target dimension: Region-based inhibition is persistent and transfers to distractors in a nontarget dimension. Sauter M; Liesefeld HR; Müller HJ J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Nov; 45(11):2080-2097. PubMed ID: 30688477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Specificity and persistence of statistical learning in distractor suppression. Britton MK; Anderson BA J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Mar; 46(3):324-334. PubMed ID: 31886698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Region-based shielding of visual search from salient distractors: Target detection is impaired with same- but not different-dimension distractors. Sauter M; Liesefeld HR; Zehetleitner M; Müller HJ Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Apr; 80(3):622-642. PubMed ID: 29299850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Altering spatial priority maps via statistical learning of target selection and distractor filtering. Ferrante O; Patacca A; Di Caro V; Della Libera C; Santandrea E; Chelazzi L Cortex; 2018 May; 102():67-95. PubMed ID: 29096874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. History Modulates Early Sensory Processing of Salient Distractors. Adam KCS; Serences JT J Neurosci; 2021 Sep; 41(38):8007-8022. PubMed ID: 34330776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Statistical regularities induce spatial as well as feature-specific suppression. Failing M; Feldmann-Wüstefeld T; Wang B; Olivers C; Theeuwes J J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Oct; 45(10):1291-1303. PubMed ID: 31157536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biasing Allocations of Attention via Selective Weighting of Saliency Signals: Behavioral and Neuroimaging Evidence for the Dimension-Weighting Account. Liesefeld HR; Liesefeld AM; Pollmann S; Müller HJ Curr Top Behav Neurosci; 2019; 41():87-113. PubMed ID: 30588570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Statistical learning of target and distractor spatial probability shape a common attentional priority computation. Ferrante O; Chelazzi L; Santandrea E Cortex; 2023 Dec; 169():95-117. PubMed ID: 37866062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. No reliable effect of task-irrelevant cross-modal statistical regularities on distractor suppression. Jagini KK; Sunny MM Cortex; 2023 Apr; 161():77-92. PubMed ID: 36913824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Spatial suppression due to statistical regularities is driven by distractor suppression not by target activation. Failing M; Wang B; Theeuwes J Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jul; 81(5):1405-1414. PubMed ID: 30868474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]