These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33048567)

  • 1. Modulations of saliency signals at two hierarchical levels of priority computation revealed by spatial statistical distractor learning.
    Liesefeld HR; Müller HJ
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2021 Apr; 150(4):710-728. PubMed ID: 33048567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Probability cueing of singleton-distractor locations in visual search: Priority-map- versus dimension-based inhibition?
    Zhang B; Allenmark F; Liesefeld HR; Shi Z; Müller HJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Sep; 45(9):1146-1163. PubMed ID: 31144860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Learning to suppress salient distractors in the target dimension: Region-based inhibition is persistent and transfers to distractors in a nontarget dimension.
    Sauter M; Liesefeld HR; Müller HJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Nov; 45(11):2080-2097. PubMed ID: 30688477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Specificity and persistence of statistical learning in distractor suppression.
    Britton MK; Anderson BA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Mar; 46(3):324-334. PubMed ID: 31886698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Region-based shielding of visual search from salient distractors: Target detection is impaired with same- but not different-dimension distractors.
    Sauter M; Liesefeld HR; Zehetleitner M; Müller HJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Apr; 80(3):622-642. PubMed ID: 29299850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Altering spatial priority maps via statistical learning of target selection and distractor filtering.
    Ferrante O; Patacca A; Di Caro V; Della Libera C; Santandrea E; Chelazzi L
    Cortex; 2018 May; 102():67-95. PubMed ID: 29096874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. History Modulates Early Sensory Processing of Salient Distractors.
    Adam KCS; Serences JT
    J Neurosci; 2021 Sep; 41(38):8007-8022. PubMed ID: 34330776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Statistical regularities induce spatial as well as feature-specific suppression.
    Failing M; Feldmann-Wüstefeld T; Wang B; Olivers C; Theeuwes J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Oct; 45(10):1291-1303. PubMed ID: 31157536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biasing Allocations of Attention via Selective Weighting of Saliency Signals: Behavioral and Neuroimaging Evidence for the Dimension-Weighting Account.
    Liesefeld HR; Liesefeld AM; Pollmann S; Müller HJ
    Curr Top Behav Neurosci; 2019; 41():87-113. PubMed ID: 30588570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Statistical learning of target and distractor spatial probability shape a common attentional priority computation.
    Ferrante O; Chelazzi L; Santandrea E
    Cortex; 2023 Dec; 169():95-117. PubMed ID: 37866062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Proactive distractor suppression elicited by statistical regularities in visual search.
    Huang C; Vilotijević A; Theeuwes J; Donk M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2021 Jun; 28(3):918-927. PubMed ID: 33620698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A saliency-specific and dimension-independent mechanism of distractor suppression.
    Gong D; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Jan; 83(1):292-307. PubMed ID: 33025466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Role of Top-Down Focused Spatial Attention in Preattentive Salience Coding and Salience-based Attentional Capture.
    Bertleff S; Fink GR; Weidner R
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2016 Aug; 28(8):1152-65. PubMed ID: 27054402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Distractor suppression leads to reduced flanker interference.
    Ivanov Y; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Feb; 83(2):624-636. PubMed ID: 33269439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How to inhibit a distractor location? Statistical learning versus active, top-down suppression.
    Wang B; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 May; 80(4):860-870. PubMed ID: 29476331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Statistical regularities modulate attentional capture.
    Wang B; Theeuwes J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Jan; 44(1):13-17. PubMed ID: 29309194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. No reliable effect of task-irrelevant cross-modal statistical regularities on distractor suppression.
    Jagini KK; Sunny MM
    Cortex; 2023 Apr; 161():77-92. PubMed ID: 36913824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Spatial suppression due to statistical regularities is driven by distractor suppression not by target activation.
    Failing M; Wang B; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jul; 81(5):1405-1414. PubMed ID: 30868474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Salience determines attentional orienting in visual selection.
    Wang B; Theeuwes J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Oct; 46(10):1051-1057. PubMed ID: 32757594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Explicit goal-driven attention, unlike implicitly learned attention, spreads to secondary tasks.
    Addleman DA; Tao J; Remington RW; Jiang YV
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Mar; 44(3):356-366. PubMed ID: 28795835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.