These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33048681)

  • 1. Visual Reasoning Strategies for Effect Size Judgments and Decisions.
    Kale A; Kay M; Hullman J
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2021 Feb; 27(2):272-282. PubMed ID: 33048681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Examining Effort in 1D Uncertainty Communication Using Individual Differences in Working Memory and NASA-TLX.
    Castro SC; Quinan PS; Hosseinpour H; Padilla L
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2022 Jan; 28(1):411-421. PubMed ID: 34587043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Uncertain About Uncertainty: How Qualitative Expressions of Forecaster Confidence Impact Decision-Making With Uncertainty Visualizations.
    Padilla LMK; Powell M; Kay M; Hullman J
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():579267. PubMed ID: 33564298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Decoupling Judgment and Decision Making: A Tale of Two Tails.
    Oral B; Dragicevic P; Telea A; Dimara E
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2023 Dec; PP():. PubMed ID: 38145516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of uncertainty visualizations on myopic loss aversion and the equity premium puzzle in retirement investment decisions.
    Wesslen R; Karduni A; Markant D; Dou W
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2022 Jan; 28(1):454-464. PubMed ID: 34570703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hypothetical Outcome Plots Help Untrained Observers Judge Trends in Ambiguous Data.
    Kale A; Nguyen F; Kay M; Hullman J
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2018 Aug; ():. PubMed ID: 30136961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The powerful influence of marks: Visual and knowledge-driven processing in hurricane track displays.
    Padilla LMK; Creem-Regehr SH; Thompson W
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2020 Mar; 26(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 31556644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Visualizing Uncertainty in Probabilistic Graphs with Network Hypothetical Outcome Plots (NetHOPs).
    Zhang D; Adar E; Hullman J
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2022 Jan; 28(1):443-453. PubMed ID: 34587012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Informing the Design of Direct-to-Consumer Interactive Personal Genomics Reports.
    Shaer O; Nov O; Okerlund J; Balestra M; Stowell E; Ascher L; Bi J; Schlenker C; Ball M
    J Med Internet Res; 2015 Jun; 17(6):e146. PubMed ID: 26070951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Bayesian cognition approach for belief updating of correlation judgement through uncertainty visualizations.
    Karduni A; Markant D; Wesslen R; Dou W
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2021 Feb; 27(2):978-988. PubMed ID: 33031041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Decision making with visualizations: a cognitive framework across disciplines.
    Padilla LM; Creem-Regehr SH; Hegarty M; Stefanucci JK
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2018 Dec; 3():29. PubMed ID: 30238055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of ensemble and summary displays on interpretations of geospatial uncertainty data.
    Padilla LM; Ruginski IT; Creem-Regehr SH
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2017; 2(1):40. PubMed ID: 29051918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In Pursuit of Error: A Survey of Uncertainty Visualization Evaluation.
    Hullman J; Qiao X; Correll M; Kale A; Kay M
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2018 Sep; ():. PubMed ID: 30207956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A user study to compare four uncertainty visualization methods for 1D and 2D datasets.
    Sanyal J; Zhang S; Bhattacharya G; Amburn P; Moorhead RJ
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2009; 15(6):1209-18. PubMed ID: 19834191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of Visualization Training on Uncertain Spatial Trajectory Predictions.
    Pugh AJ; Wickens CD; Herdener N; Clegg BA; Smith CAP
    Hum Factors; 2018 May; 60(3):324-339. PubMed ID: 29498888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Numerical and Visual Representations of Uncertainty Lead to Different Patterns of Decision Making.
    Matzen LE; Howell BC; Trumbo MCS; Divis KM
    IEEE Comput Graph Appl; 2023; 43(5):72-82. PubMed ID: 37527307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Task-Driven Evaluation of Aggregation in Time Series Visualization.
    Albers D; Correll M; Gleicher M
    Proc SIGCHI Conf Hum Factor Comput Syst; 2014; 2014():551-560. PubMed ID: 25343147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Unsafe sex: decision-making biases and heuristics.
    Kaplan BJ; Shayne VT
    AIDS Educ Prev; 1993; 5(4):294-301. PubMed ID: 8297709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Improving Visualization Design for Effective Multi-Objective Decision Making.
    Dy B; Ibrahim N; Poorthuis A; Joyce S
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2022 Oct; 28(10):3405-3416. PubMed ID: 33690120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impacts of Visualizations on Decoy Effects.
    Jeong Y; Oh S; Kang Y; Kim SH
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Dec; 18(23):. PubMed ID: 34886398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.