These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33050447)

  • 21. A Diagonal-Steering-Based Binaural Beamforming Algorithm Incorporating a Diagonal Speech Localizer for Persons With Bilateral Hearing Impairment.
    Lee JC; Nam KW; Jang DP; Kim IY
    Artif Organs; 2015 Dec; 39(12):1061-8. PubMed ID: 25959133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Parameter-based binaural hearing aid algorithms to improve speech intelligibility and localization in complex environments.
    Young Woo Lee ; Moore BC
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2015 Aug; 2015():5585-8. PubMed ID: 26737558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Auditory models of suprathreshold distortion and speech intelligibility in persons with impaired hearing.
    Bernstein JG; Summers V; Grassi E; Grant KW
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):307-28. PubMed ID: 23636211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Noise reduction results of an adaptive filtering technique for dual-microphone behind-the-ear hearing aids.
    Maj JB; Wouters J; Moonen M
    Ear Hear; 2004 Jun; 25(3):215-29. PubMed ID: 15179113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. CNN-based noise reduction for multi-channel speech enhancement system with discrete wavelet transform (DWT) preprocessing.
    Cherukuru P; Mustafa MB
    PeerJ Comput Sci; 2024; 10():e1901. PubMed ID: 38435554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Signal-to-Noise-Ratio-Aware Dynamic Range Compression in Hearing Aids.
    May T; Kowalewski B; Dau T
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518790903. PubMed ID: 30117366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Efficient two-microphone speech enhancement using basic recurrent neural network cell for hearing and hearing aids.
    Shankar N; Bhat GS; Panahi IMS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Jul; 148(1):389. PubMed ID: 32752751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Time-domain noise reduction based on an orthogonal decomposition for desired signal extraction.
    Benesty J; Chen J; Arden Huang Y; Gaensler T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jul; 132(1):452-64. PubMed ID: 22779492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Characteristics of Real-World Signal to Noise Ratios and Speech Listening Situations of Older Adults With Mild to Moderate Hearing Loss.
    Wu YH; Stangl E; Chipara O; Hasan SS; Welhaven A; Oleson J
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):293-304. PubMed ID: 29466265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Speech intelligibility benefits of hearing AIDS at various input levels.
    Kuk F; Lau CC; Korhonen P; Crose B
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Mar; 26(3):275-88. PubMed ID: 25751695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evaluation of model-based versus non-parametric monaural noise-reduction approaches for hearing aids.
    Harlander N; Rosenkranz T; Hohmann V
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Aug; 51(8):627-39. PubMed ID: 22642311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Preliminary evaluation of a formant enhancement algorithm on the perception of speech in noise for normally hearing listeners.
    Alcántara JI; Dooley GJ; Blamey PJ; Seligman PM
    Audiology; 1994; 33(1):15-27. PubMed ID: 8129677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Classification of fricative consonants for speech enhancement in hearing devices.
    Kong YY; Mullangi A; Kokkinakis K
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(4):e95001. PubMed ID: 24747721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Perceptual Evaluation of Signal-to-Noise-Ratio-Aware Dynamic Range Compression in Hearing Aids.
    Kowalewski B; Dau T; May T
    Trends Hear; 2020; 24():2331216520930531. PubMed ID: 32573373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Auditory inspired machine learning techniques can improve speech intelligibility and quality for hearing-impaired listeners.
    Monaghan JJ; Goehring T; Yang X; Bolner F; Wang S; Wright MC; Bleeck S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):1985. PubMed ID: 28372043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Impact of SNR, masker type and noise reduction processing on sentence recognition performance and listening effort as indicated by the pupil dilation response.
    Ohlenforst B; Wendt D; Kramer SE; Naylor G; Zekveld AA; Lunner T
    Hear Res; 2018 Aug; 365():90-99. PubMed ID: 29779607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Estimation of Signal-to-Noise Ratios in Realistic Sound Scenarios.
    Smeds K; Wolters F; Rung M
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Feb; 26(2):183-96. PubMed ID: 25690777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Personal amplification for school-age children with auditory processing disorders.
    Kuk F; Jackson A; Keenan D; Lau CC
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2008 Jun; 19(6):465-80. PubMed ID: 19253780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Low-latency monaural speech enhancement with deep filter-bank equalizer.
    Zheng C; Liu W; Li A; Ke Y; Li X
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 May; 151(5):3291. PubMed ID: 35649938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The effect of perceived sound quality of speech in noisy speech perception by normal hearing and hearing impaired listeners.
    Akbarzadeh S; Lee S; Chen F; Tan CT
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2019 Jul; 2019():3119-3122. PubMed ID: 31946548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.