BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33051230)

  • 1. Patient-reported experiences with general practitioners: a randomised study of mail and web-based approaches following a national survey.
    Iversen HH; Holmboe O; Bjertnaes O
    BMJ Open; 2020 Oct; 10(10):e036533. PubMed ID: 33051230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparing Web and Mail Protocols for Administering Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Surveys.
    Fowler FJ; Brenner PS; Hargraves JL; Cleary PD
    Med Care; 2021 Oct; 59(10):907-912. PubMed ID: 34334736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of administration mode on CAHPS survey response rates and results: A comparison of mail and web-based approaches.
    Fowler FJ; Cosenza C; Cripps LA; Edgman-Levitan S; Cleary PD
    Health Serv Res; 2019 Jun; 54(3):714-721. PubMed ID: 30656646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mixing web and mail methods in a survey of physicians.
    Beebe TJ; Locke GR; Barnes SA; Davern ME; Anderson KJ
    Health Serv Res; 2007 Jun; 42(3 Pt 1):1219-34. PubMed ID: 17489911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Self-reported data in environmental health studies: mail vs. web-based surveys.
    Cantuaria ML; Blanes-Vidal V
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Dec; 19(1):238. PubMed ID: 31830906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Rates, Delays, and Completeness of General Practitioners' Responses to a Postal Versus Web-Based Survey: A Randomized Trial.
    Sebo P; Maisonneuve H; Cerutti B; Fournier JP; Senn N; Haller DM
    J Med Internet Res; 2017 Mar; 19(3):e83. PubMed ID: 28330830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing the Effects of Participant Preference and Demographics in the Usage of Web-based Survey Questionnaires by Women Attending Screening Mammography in British Columbia.
    Mlikotic R; Parker B; Rajapakshe R
    J Med Internet Res; 2016 Mar; 18(3):e70. PubMed ID: 27005707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. User-experience surveys with maternity services: a randomized comparison of two data collection models.
    Bjertnaes OA; Iversen HH
    Int J Qual Health Care; 2012 Aug; 24(4):433-8. PubMed ID: 22687704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Paper- or Web-Based Questionnaire Invitations as a Method for Data Collection: Cross-Sectional Comparative Study of Differences in Response Rate, Completeness of Data, and Financial Cost.
    Ebert JF; Huibers L; Christensen B; Christensen MB
    J Med Internet Res; 2018 Jan; 20(1):e24. PubMed ID: 29362206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Means of increasing response rates in a Norwegian dietary survey among infants - results from a pseudo-randomized pilot study.
    Myhre JB; Andersen LF; Holvik K; Astrup H; Kristiansen AL
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Jul; 19(1):144. PubMed ID: 31288751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Danish health and morbidity surveys: study design and participant characteristics.
    Jensen HAR; Ekholm O; Davidsen M; Christensen AI
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 May; 19(1):91. PubMed ID: 31053088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A randomized comparison of three data collection models for the measurement of parent experiences with diabetes outpatient care.
    Bjertnaes O; Iversen HH; Skrivarhaug T
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Sep; 18(1):95. PubMed ID: 30236067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Internet versus mailed questionnaires: a randomized comparison (2).
    Leece P; Bhandari M; Sprague S; Swiontkowski MF; Schemitsch EH; Tornetta P; Devereaux PJ; Guyatt GH
    J Med Internet Res; 2004 Sep; 6(3):e30. PubMed ID: 15471756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Internet versus mailed questionnaires: a controlled comparison (2).
    Leece P; Bhandari M; Sprague S; Swiontkowski MF; Schemitsch EH; Tornetta P; Devereaux PJ; Guyatt GH
    J Med Internet Res; 2004 Oct; 6(4):e39. PubMed ID: 15631963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effectiveness of recruitment strategies on general practitioner's survey response rates - a systematic review.
    Pit SW; Vo T; Pyakurel S
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2014 Jun; 14():76. PubMed ID: 24906492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Remote Collection of Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Outpatient Hand Surgery: A Randomized Trial of Telephone, Mail, and E-Mail.
    Schwartzenberger J; Presson A; Lyle A; O'Farrell A; Tyser AR
    J Hand Surg Am; 2017 Sep; 42(9):693-699. PubMed ID: 28600107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Implementation of evidence-based knowledge inĀ general practice.
    Le JV
    Dan Med J; 2017 Dec; 64(12):. PubMed ID: 29206099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparing Web-based with Mail Survey Administration of the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS
    Bergeson SC; Gray J; Ehrmantraut LA; Laibson T; Hays RD
    Prim Health Care; 2013 Apr; 3():. PubMed ID: 24078901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Response rates for patient-reported outcomes using web-based versus paper questionnaires: comparison of two invitational methods in older colorectal cancer patients.
    Horevoorts NJ; Vissers PA; Mols F; Thong MS; van de Poll-Franse LV
    J Med Internet Res; 2015 May; 17(5):e111. PubMed ID: 25953059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Patient experiences and the association with organizational factors in general practice: results from the Norwegian part of the international, multi-centre, cross-sectional QUALICOPC study.
    Eide TB; Straand J; Melbye H; Rortveit G; Hetlevik I; Rosvold EO
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2016 Aug; 16(1):428. PubMed ID: 27553244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.