These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33051262)

  • 1. Estimation of Molecular Pairwise Relatedness in Autopolyploid Crops.
    Amadeu RR; Lara LAC; Munoz P; Garcia AAF
    G3 (Bethesda); 2020 Dec; 10(12):4579-4589. PubMed ID: 33051262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pedigrees or markers: Which are better in estimating relatedness and inbreeding coefficient?
    Wang J
    Theor Popul Biol; 2016 Feb; 107():4-13. PubMed ID: 26344786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. AGHmatrix: R Package to Construct Relationship Matrices for Autotetraploid and Diploid Species: A Blueberry Example.
    Amadeu RR; Cellon C; Olmstead JW; Garcia AA; Resende MF; Muñoz PR
    Plant Genome; 2016 Nov; 9(3):. PubMed ID: 27902800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improved estimation of inbreeding and kinship in pigs using optimized SNP panels.
    Lopes MS; Silva FF; Harlizius B; Duijvesteijn N; Lopes PS; Guimarães SE; Knol EF
    BMC Genet; 2013 Sep; 14():92. PubMed ID: 24063757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A maximum-likelihood estimation of pairwise relatedness for autopolyploids.
    Huang K; Guo ST; Shattuck MR; Chen ST; Qi XG; Zhang P; Li BG
    Heredity (Edinb); 2015 Feb; 114(2):133-42. PubMed ID: 25370210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimating relatedness and inbreeding using molecular markers and pedigrees: the effect of demographic history.
    Robinson SP; Simmons LW; Kennington WJ
    Mol Ecol; 2013 Dec; 22(23):5779-92. PubMed ID: 24102888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of approaches to estimate the inbreeding coefficient and pairwise relatedness using genomic and pedigree data in a sheep population.
    Li MH; Strandén I; Tiirikka T; Sevón-Aimonen ML; Kantanen J
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(11):e26256. PubMed ID: 22114661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On the use of large marker panels to estimate inbreeding and relatedness: empirical and simulation studies of a pedigreed zebra finch population typed at 771 SNPs.
    Santure AW; Stapley J; Ball AD; Birkhead TR; Burke T; Slate J
    Mol Ecol; 2010 Apr; 19(7):1439-51. PubMed ID: 20149098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimation of inbreeding using pedigree, 50k SNP chip genotypes and full sequence data in three cattle breeds.
    Zhang Q; Calus MP; Guldbrandtsen B; Lund MS; Sahana G
    BMC Genet; 2015 Jul; 16():88. PubMed ID: 26195126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Performance of marker-based relatedness estimators in natural populations of outbred vertebrates.
    Csilléry K; Johnson T; Beraldi D; Clutton-Brock T; Coltman D; Hansson B; Spong G; Pemberton JM
    Genetics; 2006 Aug; 173(4):2091-101. PubMed ID: 16783017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimating Genetic Relatedness in Admixed Populations.
    Sethuraman A
    G3 (Bethesda); 2018 Oct; 8(10):3203-3220. PubMed ID: 30104261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimating Seven Coefficients of Pairwise Relatedness Using Population-Genomic Data.
    Ackerman MS; Johri P; Spitze K; Xu S; Doak TG; Young K; Lynch M
    Genetics; 2017 May; 206(1):105-118. PubMed ID: 28341647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Population genetics of autopolyploids under a mixed mating model and the estimation of selfing rate.
    Hardy OJ
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2016 Jan; 16(1):103-17. PubMed ID: 25981126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multilocus estimation of pairwise relatedness with dominant markers.
    Ritland K
    Mol Ecol; 2005 Sep; 14(10):3157-65. PubMed ID: 16101781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How many SNPs are enough?
    Smouse PE
    Mol Ecol; 2010 Apr; 19(7):1265-6. PubMed ID: 20456228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Parent-offspring inference in inbred populations.
    Runge JN; König B; Lindholm AK; Bendesky A
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2022 Nov; 22(8):2981-2993. PubMed ID: 35770342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. QuickPed: an online tool for drawing pedigrees and analysing relatedness.
    Vigeland MD
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2022 Jun; 23(1):220. PubMed ID: 35672681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Unified Characterization of Population Structure and Relatedness.
    Weir BS; Goudet J
    Genetics; 2017 Aug; 206(4):2085-2103. PubMed ID: 28550018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pairwise relatedness testing in the context of inbreeding: expectation and variance of the likelihood ratio.
    Brustad HK; Vigeland MD; Egeland T
    Int J Legal Med; 2021 Jan; 135(1):117-129. PubMed ID: 32989564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Partial genotyping at polymorphic markers can improve heritability estimates in sibling groups.
    Gauzere J; Oddou-Muratorio S; Gay L; Klein EK
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2016 Nov; 16(6):1340-1352. PubMed ID: 27251122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.