These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33051641)

  • 21. HybridDock: A Hybrid Protein-Ligand Docking Protocol Integrating Protein- and Ligand-Based Approaches.
    Huang SY; Li M; Wang J; Pan Y
    J Chem Inf Model; 2016 Jun; 56(6):1078-87. PubMed ID: 26317502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Stalis: A Computational Method for Template-Based Ab Initio Ligand Design.
    Lee HS; Im W
    J Comput Chem; 2019 Jun; 40(17):1622-1632. PubMed ID: 30829435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Allosteric sites can be identified based on the residue-residue interaction energy difference.
    Ma X; Qi Y; Lai L
    Proteins; 2015 Aug; 83(8):1375-84. PubMed ID: 25185787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. CSAR Benchmark of Flexible MedusaDock in Affinity Prediction and Nativelike Binding Pose Selection.
    Nedumpully-Govindan P; Jemec DB; Ding F
    J Chem Inf Model; 2016 Jun; 56(6):1042-52. PubMed ID: 26252196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Molecular interaction fingerprint approaches for GPCR drug discovery.
    Vass M; Kooistra AJ; Ritschel T; Leurs R; de Esch IJ; de Graaf C
    Curr Opin Pharmacol; 2016 Oct; 30():59-68. PubMed ID: 27479316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Ligand and structure based virtual screening of chemical databases to explore potent small molecule inhibitors against breast invasive carcinoma using recent computational technologies.
    Agarwal S; Dixit A; Kashaw SK
    J Mol Graph Model; 2020 Jul; 98():107591. PubMed ID: 32234678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Nonlinear scoring functions for similarity-based ligand docking and binding affinity prediction.
    Brylinski M
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Nov; 53(11):3097-112. PubMed ID: 24171431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A comprehensive docking study on the selectivity of binding of aromatic compounds to proteins.
    Hetényi C; Maran U; Karelson M
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2003; 43(5):1576-83. PubMed ID: 14502492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. An electronic environment and contact direction sensitive scoring function for predicting affinities of protein-ligand complexes in Contour(®).
    Lindblom PR; Wu G; Liu Z; Jim KC; Baldwin JJ; Gregg RE; Claremon DA; Singh SB
    J Mol Graph Model; 2014 Sep; 53():118-127. PubMed ID: 25123650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Screening of drug target proteins by 2D ligand matching approach.
    Feng J; Guo H; Wang J; Lu T
    Chem Biol Drug Des; 2014 Feb; 83(2):174-82. PubMed ID: 24034065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. SPOT-Ligand: Fast and effective structure-based virtual screening by binding homology search according to ligand and receptor similarity.
    Yang Y; Zhan J; Zhou Y
    J Comput Chem; 2016 Jul; 37(18):1734-9. PubMed ID: 27074979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Structural interaction fingerprint (SIFt): a novel method for analyzing three-dimensional protein-ligand binding interactions.
    Deng Z; Chuaqui C; Singh J
    J Med Chem; 2004 Jan; 47(2):337-44. PubMed ID: 14711306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. HarmonyDOCK: the structural analysis of poses in protein-ligand docking.
    Plewczynski D; Philips A; Von Grotthuss M; Rychlewski L; Ginalski K
    J Comput Biol; 2014 Mar; 21(3):247-56. PubMed ID: 21091053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Machine-learning scoring functions for identifying native poses of ligands docked to known and novel proteins.
    Ashtawy HM; Mahapatra NR
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2015; 16 Suppl 6(Suppl 6):S3. PubMed ID: 25916860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. In Silico Prediction and Validation of CB2 Allosteric Binding Sites to Aid the Design of Allosteric Modulators.
    Yuan J; Jiang C; Wang J; Chen CJ; Hao Y; Zhao G; Feng Z; Xie XQ
    Molecules; 2022 Jan; 27(2):. PubMed ID: 35056767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Solvent structure improves docking prediction in lectin-carbohydrate complexes.
    Gauto DF; Petruk AA; Modenutti CP; Blanco JI; Di Lella S; Martí MA
    Glycobiology; 2013 Feb; 23(2):241-58. PubMed ID: 23089616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. DDT - Drug Discovery Tool: a fast and intuitive graphics user interface for docking and molecular dynamics analysis.
    Aureli S; Di Marino D; Raniolo S; Limongelli V
    Bioinformatics; 2019 Dec; 35(24):5328-5330. PubMed ID: 31304963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Computational method to identify druggable binding sites that target protein-protein interactions.
    Li H; Kasam V; Tautermann CS; Seeliger D; Vaidehi N
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 May; 54(5):1391-400. PubMed ID: 24762202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Insights into the substrate binding specificity of quorum-quenching acylase PvdQ.
    Liu Y; Ebalunode JO; Briggs JM
    J Mol Graph Model; 2019 May; 88():104-120. PubMed ID: 30703686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Is It Reliable to Use Common Molecular Docking Methods for Comparing the Binding Affinities of Enantiomer Pairs for Their Protein Target?
    Ramírez D; Caballero J
    Int J Mol Sci; 2016 Apr; 17(4):. PubMed ID: 27104528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.