These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33052797)
1. Biological versus non-biological dressings in the management of split-thickness skin-graft donor sites: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Rahman S; Langridge B; Al-Hadad A; Khan RA; Junejo MH; Mosahebi A J Wound Care; 2020 Oct; 29(10):604-610. PubMed ID: 33052797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The use of modern dressings in managing split-thickness skin graft donor sites: a single-centre randomised controlled trial. Kazanavičius M; Cepas A; Kolaityte V; Simoliuniene R; Rimdeika R J Wound Care; 2017 Jun; 26(6):281-291. PubMed ID: 28598760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Human Amniotic Membrane: A New Option for Graft Donor Sites - Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Abul A; Karam M; Rahman S Int Wound J; 2020 Jun; 17(3):547-554. PubMed ID: 31972902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison between Aquacel and Aquacel Foam dressing on split-thickness skin graft donor site. Chiang SH; Xu X; Cheung DST; Hsu YH; Chen CE; Lin CH; Smith R; Lin CC J Wound Care; 2021 Dec; 30(Sup12):S14-S20. PubMed ID: 34882003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The use of moist wound-healing dressings in the management of split-thickness skin graft donor sites: a systematic review. Wiechula R Int J Nurs Pract; 2003 Apr; 9(2):S9-17. PubMed ID: 12694482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. CICAFAST: comparison of a biological dressing composed of fetal fibroblasts and keratinocytes on a split-thickness skin graft donor site versus a traditional dressing: a randomized controlled trial. Poinas A; Perrot P; Lorant J; Nerrière O; Nguyen JM; Saiagh S; Frenard C; Leduc A; Malard O; Espitalier F; Duteille F; Chiffoleau A; Vrignaud F; Khammari A; Dréno B Trials; 2019 Oct; 20(1):612. PubMed ID: 31661012 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Use of a novel chitosan-based dressing on split-thickness skin graft donor sites: a pilot study. Varon DE; Smith JD; Bharadia DR; Shafique N; Sakthivel D; Halvorson EG; Nuutila K; Sinha I J Wound Care; 2018 Jul; 27(Sup7):S12-S18. PubMed ID: 30008255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Use of honey as an adjunct in the healing of split-thickness skin graft donor site. Misirlioglu A; Eroglu S; Karacaoglan N; Akan M; Akoz T; Yildirim S Dermatol Surg; 2003 Feb; 29(2):168-72. PubMed ID: 12562348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Wound-healing improvement by resurfacing split-thickness skin donor sites with thin split-thickness grafting. Bian Y; Sun C; Zhang X; Li Y; Li W; Lv X; Li J; Jiang L; Li J; Feng J; Li XY Burns; 2016 Feb; 42(1):123-130. PubMed ID: 26615713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of human amniotic membrane as a wound dressing for split-thickness skin-graft donor sites. Loeffelbein DJ; Rohleder NH; Eddicks M; Baumann CM; Stoeckelhuber M; Wolff KD; Drecoll E; Steinstraesser L; Hennerbichler S; Kesting MR Biomed Res Int; 2014; 2014():572183. PubMed ID: 25003117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Management of split-thickness skin graft donor sites: a randomized controlled trial of calcium alginate versus polyurethane film dressing. Läuchli S; Hafner J; Ostheeren S; Mayer D; Barysch MJ; French LE Dermatology; 2013; 227(4):361-6. PubMed ID: 24281776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Alginate dressing and polyurethane film versus paraffin gauze in the treatment of split-thickness skin graft donor sites: a randomized controlled pilot study. Kaiser D; Hafner J; Mayer D; French LE; Läuchli S Adv Skin Wound Care; 2013 Feb; 26(2):67-73. PubMed ID: 23337646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Split-thickness skin graft donor site management. A randomized prospective trial comparing a hydrophilic polyurethane absorbent foam dressing with a petrolatum gauze dressing. Weber RS; Hankins P; Limitone E; Callender D; Frankenthaler RM; Wolf P; Goepfert H Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1995 Oct; 121(10):1145-9. PubMed ID: 7546582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of Biatain Ag and Biatain Alginate Ag dressings on skin graft donor sites: a prospective clinical trial. Xianchao D; Yi L; Chang L; Zhixin Y J Wound Care; 2023 Sep; 32(Sup9a):cxcv-cc. PubMed ID: 37703218 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Egg membrane as a new biological dressing in split-thickness skin graft donor sites: a preliminary clinical evaluation. Yang JY; Chuang SS; Yang WG; Tsay PK Chang Gung Med J; 2003 Mar; 26(3):153-9. PubMed ID: 12790218 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A prospective clinical trial comparing Biobrane(®) Dressilk(®) and PolyMem(®) dressings on partial-thickness skin graft donor sites. Schulz A; Depner C; Lefering R; Kricheldorff J; Kästner S; Fuchs PC; Demir E Burns; 2016 Mar; 42(2):345-55. PubMed ID: 25720659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prospective randomised controlled trial of Algisite™ M, Cuticerin™, and Sorbact® as donor site dressings in paediatric split-thickness skin grafts. McBride CA; Kimble RM; Stockton KA Burns Trauma; 2018; 6():33. PubMed ID: 30519595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]