160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33052797)
1. Biological versus non-biological dressings in the management of split-thickness skin-graft donor sites: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Rahman S; Langridge B; Al-Hadad A; Khan RA; Junejo MH; Mosahebi A
J Wound Care; 2020 Oct; 29(10):604-610. PubMed ID: 33052797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The use of modern dressings in managing split-thickness skin graft donor sites: a single-centre randomised controlled trial.
Kazanavičius M; Cepas A; Kolaityte V; Simoliuniene R; Rimdeika R
J Wound Care; 2017 Jun; 26(6):281-291. PubMed ID: 28598760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Human Amniotic Membrane: A New Option for Graft Donor Sites - Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Abul A; Karam M; Rahman S
Int Wound J; 2020 Jun; 17(3):547-554. PubMed ID: 31972902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison between Aquacel and Aquacel Foam dressing on split-thickness skin graft donor site.
Chiang SH; Xu X; Cheung DST; Hsu YH; Chen CE; Lin CH; Smith R; Lin CC
J Wound Care; 2021 Dec; 30(Sup12):S14-S20. PubMed ID: 34882003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The use of moist wound-healing dressings in the management of split-thickness skin graft donor sites: a systematic review.
Wiechula R
Int J Nurs Pract; 2003 Apr; 9(2):S9-17. PubMed ID: 12694482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. CICAFAST: comparison of a biological dressing composed of fetal fibroblasts and keratinocytes on a split-thickness skin graft donor site versus a traditional dressing: a randomized controlled trial.
Poinas A; Perrot P; Lorant J; Nerrière O; Nguyen JM; Saiagh S; Frenard C; Leduc A; Malard O; Espitalier F; Duteille F; Chiffoleau A; Vrignaud F; Khammari A; Dréno B
Trials; 2019 Oct; 20(1):612. PubMed ID: 31661012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Use of a novel chitosan-based dressing on split-thickness skin graft donor sites: a pilot study.
Varon DE; Smith JD; Bharadia DR; Shafique N; Sakthivel D; Halvorson EG; Nuutila K; Sinha I
J Wound Care; 2018 Jul; 27(Sup7):S12-S18. PubMed ID: 30008255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Management of superficial to partial-thickness wounds.
Beam JW
J Athl Train; 2007; 42(3):422-4. PubMed ID: 18059999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Amniotic membrane for treating skin graft donor sites: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Liang X; Zhou L; Yan J
Burns; 2020 May; 46(3):621-629. PubMed ID: 31623939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Full-thickness skin graft versus split-thickness skin graft for radial forearm free flap donor site closure: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Moors JJE; Xu Z; Xie K; Rashad A; Egger J; Röhrig R; Hölzle F; Puladi B
Syst Rev; 2024 Feb; 13(1):74. PubMed ID: 38409059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Meta-analysis and Systematic Review of Skin Graft Donor-site Dressings with Future Guidelines.
Serebrakian AT; Pickrell BB; Varon DE; Mohamadi A; Grinstaff MW; Rodriguez EK; Nazarian A; Halvorson EG; Sinha I
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open; 2018 Sep; 6(9):e1928. PubMed ID: 30349793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Use of honey as an adjunct in the healing of split-thickness skin graft donor site.
Misirlioglu A; Eroglu S; Karacaoglan N; Akan M; Akoz T; Yildirim S
Dermatol Surg; 2003 Feb; 29(2):168-72. PubMed ID: 12562348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Wound-healing improvement by resurfacing split-thickness skin donor sites with thin split-thickness grafting.
Bian Y; Sun C; Zhang X; Li Y; Li W; Lv X; Li J; Jiang L; Li J; Feng J; Li XY
Burns; 2016 Feb; 42(1):123-130. PubMed ID: 26615713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of human amniotic membrane as a wound dressing for split-thickness skin-graft donor sites.
Loeffelbein DJ; Rohleder NH; Eddicks M; Baumann CM; Stoeckelhuber M; Wolff KD; Drecoll E; Steinstraesser L; Hennerbichler S; Kesting MR
Biomed Res Int; 2014; 2014():572183. PubMed ID: 25003117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Management of split-thickness skin graft donor sites: a randomized controlled trial of calcium alginate versus polyurethane film dressing.
Läuchli S; Hafner J; Ostheeren S; Mayer D; Barysch MJ; French LE
Dermatology; 2013; 227(4):361-6. PubMed ID: 24281776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Alginate dressing and polyurethane film versus paraffin gauze in the treatment of split-thickness skin graft donor sites: a randomized controlled pilot study.
Kaiser D; Hafner J; Mayer D; French LE; Läuchli S
Adv Skin Wound Care; 2013 Feb; 26(2):67-73. PubMed ID: 23337646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Split-thickness skin graft donor site management. A randomized prospective trial comparing a hydrophilic polyurethane absorbent foam dressing with a petrolatum gauze dressing.
Weber RS; Hankins P; Limitone E; Callender D; Frankenthaler RM; Wolf P; Goepfert H
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1995 Oct; 121(10):1145-9. PubMed ID: 7546582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of Biatain Ag and Biatain Alginate Ag dressings on skin graft donor sites: a prospective clinical trial.
Xianchao D; Yi L; Chang L; Zhixin Y
J Wound Care; 2023 Sep; 32(Sup9a):cxcv-cc. PubMed ID: 37703218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Egg membrane as a new biological dressing in split-thickness skin graft donor sites: a preliminary clinical evaluation.
Yang JY; Chuang SS; Yang WG; Tsay PK
Chang Gung Med J; 2003 Mar; 26(3):153-9. PubMed ID: 12790218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A prospective clinical trial comparing Biobrane(®) Dressilk(®) and PolyMem(®) dressings on partial-thickness skin graft donor sites.
Schulz A; Depner C; Lefering R; Kricheldorff J; Kästner S; Fuchs PC; Demir E
Burns; 2016 Mar; 42(2):345-55. PubMed ID: 25720659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
