These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33053696)
1. Computer-Aided Rehabilitation Supported by Zygomatic Implants: A Cohort Study Comparing Atrophic with Oncologic Patients after Five Years of Follow-Up. Pellegrino G; Basile F; Relics D; Ferri A; Grande F; Tarsitano A; Marchetti C J Clin Med; 2020 Oct; 9(10):. PubMed ID: 33053696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A prospective clinical study on titanium implants in the zygomatic arch for prosthetic rehabilitation of the atrophic edentulous maxilla with a follow-up of 6 months to 5 years. Aparicio C; Ouazzani W; Garcia R; Arevalo X; Muela R; Fortes V Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2006; 8(3):114-22. PubMed ID: 16919019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Immediate full-arch rehabilitation of the severely atrophic maxilla supported by zygomatic implants: a prospective clinical study with minimum follow-up of 6 years. Agliardi EL; Romeo D; Panigatti S; de Araújo Nobre M; Maló P Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Dec; 46(12):1592-1599. PubMed ID: 28655434 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Rehabilitation of severely atrophic maxillae with fixed implant-supported prostheses using zygomatic implants placed using the sinus slot technique: clinical report on a series of 21 patients. Peñarrocha M; García B; Martí E; Boronat A Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(4):645-50. PubMed ID: 17929527 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical outcome of 302 zygomatic implants in 110 patients with a follow-up between 6 months and 7 years. Goker F; Grecchi E; Del Fabbro M; Grecchi F Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2020 Jun; 22(3):415-423. PubMed ID: 32291961 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Success Rates of Zygomatic Implants for the Rehabilitation of Severely Atrophic Maxilla: A Systematic Review. Solà Pérez A; Pastorino D; Aparicio C; Pegueroles Neyra M; Khan RS; Wright S; Ucer C Dent J (Basel); 2022 Aug; 10(8):. PubMed ID: 36005249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of 31 zygomatic implants and 74 regular dental implants used in 16 patients for prosthetic reconstruction of the atrophic maxilla with cross-arch fixed bridges. Becktor JP; Isaksson S; Abrahamsson P; Sennerby L Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2005; 7(3):159-65. PubMed ID: 16219246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Minimally invasive treatment of the atrophic posterior maxilla: a proof-of-concept prospective study with a follow-up of between 36 and 54 months. Pozzi A; Sannino G; Barlattani A J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Nov; 108(5):286-97. PubMed ID: 23107236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Implants placed in the nasopalatine canal to rehabilitate severely atrophic maxillae: a retrospective study with long follow-up. Peñarrocha D; Candel E; Guirado JL; Canullo L; Peñarrocha M J Oral Implantol; 2014 Dec; 40(6):699-706. PubMed ID: 23397941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Finite element analysis of zygomatic implants in intrasinus and extramaxillary approaches for prosthetic rehabilitation in severely atrophic maxillae. Ishak MI; Kadir MR; Sulaiman E; Kasim NH Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(3):e151-60. PubMed ID: 23748334 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Three-year clinical prospective follow-up of extrasinus zygomatic implants for the rehabilitation of the atrophic maxilla. Coppedê A; de Mayo T; de Sá Zamperlini M; Amorin R; de Pádua APAT; Shibli JA Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2017 Oct; 19(5):926-934. PubMed ID: 28703481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Rehabilitation of reabsorbed maxillae with implants in buttresses in patients with combination syndrome. Peñarrocha M; Viña JA; Carrillo C; Peñarrocha D; Peñarrocha M J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 May; 70(5):e322-30. PubMed ID: 22538025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. ORIS Criteria of Success for the Zygoma-Related Rehabilitation: The (Revisited) Zygoma Success Code. Aparicio C; López-Piriz R; Albrektsson T Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2020; 35(2):366-378. PubMed ID: 32142574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reliability of four zygomatic implant-supported prostheses for the rehabilitation of the atrophic maxilla: a systematic review. Wang F; Monje A; Lin GH; Wu Y; Monje F; Wang HL; Davó R Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(2):293-8. PubMed ID: 25830389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A Retrospective Cohort Study of the Survival Rate of 88 Zygomatic Implants Placed Over an 18-year Period. Chana H; Smith G; Bansal H; Zahra D Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(2):461-470. PubMed ID: 30883622 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A new approach to rehabilitate the severely atrophic maxilla using extramaxillary anchored implants in immediate function: a pilot study. Maló P; Nobre Mde A; Lopes I J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Nov; 100(5):354-66. PubMed ID: 18992569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]