These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33055364)

  • 1. Consistency of local activation parameters at sensor- and source-level in neural signals.
    Rodríguez-González V; Gómez C; Shigihara Y; Hoshi H; Revilla-Vallejo M; Hornero R; Poza J
    J Neural Eng; 2020 Oct; 17(5):056020. PubMed ID: 33055364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of the spatial resolution of source imaging techniques in high-density EEG and MEG.
    Hedrich T; Pellegrino G; Kobayashi E; Lina JM; Grova C
    Neuroimage; 2017 Aug; 157():531-544. PubMed ID: 28619655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Is sensor space analysis good enough? Spatial patterns as a tool for assessing spatial mixing of EEG/MEG rhythms.
    Schaworonkow N; Nikulin VV
    Neuroimage; 2022 Jun; 253():119093. PubMed ID: 35288283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. EEG-MEG Integration Enhances the Characterization of Functional and Effective Connectivity in the Resting State Network.
    Muthuraman M; Moliadze V; Mideksa KG; Anwar AR; Stephani U; Deuschl G; Freitag CM; Siniatchkin M
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0140832. PubMed ID: 26509448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Towards an objective evaluation of EEG/MEG source estimation methods - The linear approach.
    Hauk O; Stenroos M; Treder MS
    Neuroimage; 2022 Jul; 255():119177. PubMed ID: 35390459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of Field Spread on Resting-State Magneto Encephalography Functional Network Analysis: A Computational Modeling Study.
    Silva Pereira S; Hindriks R; Mühlberg S; Maris E; van Ede F; Griffa A; Hagmann P; Deco G
    Brain Connect; 2017 Nov; 7(9):541-557. PubMed ID: 28875718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of the effect of volume conduction on EEG coherence with the effect of field spread on MEG coherence.
    Winter WR; Nunez PL; Ding J; Srinivasan R
    Stat Med; 2007 Sep; 26(21):3946-57. PubMed ID: 17607723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mean-Field Modeling of Brain-Scale Dynamics for the Evaluation of EEG Source-Space Networks.
    Allouch S; Yochum M; Kabbara A; Duprez J; Khalil M; Wendling F; Hassan M; Modolo J
    Brain Topogr; 2022 Jan; 35(1):54-65. PubMed ID: 34244910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Space-Time-Frequency Multi-Sensor Analysis for Motor Cortex Localization Using Magnetoencephalography.
    Auboiroux V; Larzabal C; Langar L; Rohu V; Mishchenko A; Arizumi N; Labyt E; Benabid AL; Aksenova T
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 May; 20(9):. PubMed ID: 32397472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Anatomical constraints on source models for high-resolution EEG and MEG derived from MRI.
    Srinivasan R
    Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2006 Aug; 5(4):389-99. PubMed ID: 16866569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Automated model selection in covariance estimation and spatial whitening of MEG and EEG signals.
    Engemann DA; Gramfort A
    Neuroimage; 2015 Mar; 108():328-42. PubMed ID: 25541187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of channel density, inverse solutions and connectivity measures on EEG resting-state networks reconstruction: A simulation study.
    Allouch S; Kabbara A; Duprez J; Khalil M; Modolo J; Hassan M
    Neuroimage; 2023 May; 271():120006. PubMed ID: 36914106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. MEG-EEG Information Fusion and Electromagnetic Source Imaging: From Theory to Clinical Application in Epilepsy.
    Chowdhury RA; Zerouali Y; Hedrich T; Heers M; Kobayashi E; Lina JM; Grova C
    Brain Topogr; 2015 Nov; 28(6):785-812. PubMed ID: 26016950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The impact of MEG source reconstruction method on source-space connectivity estimation: A comparison between minimum-norm solution and beamforming.
    Hincapié AS; Kujala J; Mattout J; Pascarella A; Daligault S; Delpuech C; Mery D; Cosmelli D; Jerbi K
    Neuroimage; 2017 Aug; 156():29-42. PubMed ID: 28479475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reconstructing coherent networks from electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography with reduced contamination from volume conduction or magnetic field spread.
    Drakesmith M; El-Deredy W; Welbourne S
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(12):e81553. PubMed ID: 24349088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of Brain Source Localization Methods Based on Test-Retest Reliability With Multiple Session EEG Data.
    Qin X; Du L; Jiao X; Wang J; Tong S; Yuan T; Sun J
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2023 Jul; 70(7):2080-2090. PubMed ID: 37018593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Source-space ICA for MEG source imaging.
    Jonmohamadi Y; Jones RD
    J Neural Eng; 2016 Feb; 13(1):016005. PubMed ID: 26644284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Frequency-dependent functional connectivity within resting-state networks: an atlas-based MEG beamformer solution.
    Hillebrand A; Barnes GR; Bosboom JL; Berendse HW; Stam CJ
    Neuroimage; 2012 Feb; 59(4):3909-21. PubMed ID: 22122866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. EEG and MEG coherence: measures of functional connectivity at distinct spatial scales of neocortical dynamics.
    Srinivasan R; Winter WR; Ding J; Nunez PL
    J Neurosci Methods; 2007 Oct; 166(1):41-52. PubMed ID: 17698205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Differences in MEG and EEG power-law scaling explained by a coupling between spatial coherence and frequency: a simulation study.
    Bénar CG; Grova C; Jirsa VK; Lina JM
    J Comput Neurosci; 2019 Aug; 47(1):31-41. PubMed ID: 31292816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.