BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33055516)

  • 1. The Relationship between Pupillometric Values and Visual Evoked Potential Test Results in Patients with Early Glaucoma.
    Işik MU; Şahin ÖF
    Optom Vis Sci; 2020 Oct; 97(10):898-902. PubMed ID: 33055516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of Pupil Fields Using a Newly Developed Perimeter in Glaucoma Patients.
    Totsuka K; Asakawa K; Ishikawa H; Shoji N
    Curr Eye Res; 2019 May; 44(5):527-532. PubMed ID: 30582731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Objective VEP perimetry in glaucoma: asymmetry analysis to identify early deficits.
    Graham SL; Klistorner AI; Grigg JR; Billson FA
    J Glaucoma; 2000 Feb; 9(1):10-9. PubMed ID: 10708226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of VEP perimetry in normal subjects and glaucoma patients.
    Bengtsson B
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2002 Dec; 80(6):620-6. PubMed ID: 12485283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical ability of pattern electroretinograms and visual evoked potentials in detecting visual dysfunction in ocular hypertension and glaucoma.
    Parisi V; Miglior S; Manni G; Centofanti M; Bucci MG
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Feb; 113(2):216-28. PubMed ID: 16406535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pupillary Responses to Full-Field Chromatic Stimuli Are Reduced in Patients with Early-Stage Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma.
    Najjar RP; Sharma S; Atalay E; Rukmini AV; Sun C; Lock JZ; Baskaran M; Perera SA; Husain R; Lamoureux E; Gooley JJ; Aung T; Milea D
    Ophthalmology; 2018 Sep; 125(9):1362-1371. PubMed ID: 29573814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Luminance and colour variant pupil perimetry in glaucoma.
    Carle CF; James AC; Kolic M; Essex RW; Maddess T
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2014 Dec; 42(9):815-24. PubMed ID: 24725214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impaired visual function in glaucoma.
    Parisi V
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2001 Feb; 112(2):351-8. PubMed ID: 11165541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Photopic negative response of full-field electroretinography in patients with different stages of glaucomatous optic neuropathy.
    Kirkiewicz M; Lubiński W; Penkala K
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2016 Feb; 132(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 26831670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Correlation Between Inter-Eye Difference in Average Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness and Afferent Pupillary Response as Measured by an Automated Pupillometer in Glaucoma.
    Sarezky D; Volpe NJ; Park MS; Tanna AP
    J Glaucoma; 2016 Mar; 25(3):312-6. PubMed ID: 25836662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The visual evoked potential in glaucoma and ocular hypertension: effects of check size, field size, and stimulation rate.
    Towle VL; Moskowitz A; Sokol S; Schwartz B
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1983 Feb; 24(2):175-83. PubMed ID: 6826322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is combined mechanism glaucoma a distinct entity?
    Sihota R; Kumar S; Sidhu T; Midha N; Sharma A; Yadav S; Gupta V; Dada T
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2018 Oct; 256(10):1961-1969. PubMed ID: 29922891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Flicker-defined form perimetry in glaucoma patients.
    Horn FK; Kremers J; Mardin CY; Jünemann AG; Adler W; Tornow RP
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2015 Mar; 253(3):447-55. PubMed ID: 25511293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Correlation between optical coherence tomography, pattern electroretinogram, and visual evoked potentials in open-angle glaucoma patients.
    Parisi V; Manni G; Centofanti M; Gandolfi SA; Olzi D; Bucci MG
    Ophthalmology; 2001 May; 108(5):905-12. PubMed ID: 11320021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visual evoked potentials under luminance contrast and color contrast stimulation in glaucoma diagnosis.
    Horn FK; Bergua A; Jünemann A; Korth M
    J Glaucoma; 2000 Dec; 9(6):428-37. PubMed ID: 11131748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Development and validation of an associative model for the detection of glaucoma using pupillography.
    Chang DS; Arora KS; Boland MV; Supakontanasan W; Friedman DS
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2013 Dec; 156(6):1285-1296.e2. PubMed ID: 24011523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Detecting early to mild glaucomatous damage: a comparison of the multifocal VEP and automated perimetry.
    Hood DC; Thienprasiddhi P; Greenstein VC; Winn BJ; Ohri N; Liebmann JM; Ritch R
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2004 Feb; 45(2):492-8. PubMed ID: 14744890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multifocal blue-on-yellow visual evoked potentials in early glaucoma.
    Klistorner A; Graham SL; Martins A; Grigg JR; Arvind H; Kumar RS; James AC; Billson FA
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Sep; 114(9):1613-21. PubMed ID: 17822971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Detecting early functional damage in glaucoma suspect and ocular hypertensive patients with the multifocal VEP technique.
    Thienprasiddhi P; Greenstein VC; Chu DH; Xu L; Liebmann JM; Ritch R; Hood DC
    J Glaucoma; 2006 Aug; 15(4):321-7. PubMed ID: 16865010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy of isolated-check visual evoked potential technique for diagnosing primary open-angle glaucoma.
    Xu LJ; Zhang L; Li SL; Zemon V; Virgili G; Liang YB
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2017 Oct; 135(2):107-119. PubMed ID: 28702796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.